bump `rustc-perf` submodule
This updates the `rustc-perf` submodule to pull in the recent changes, in particular the error handling in https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/pull/2021 fixing the error we saw in a recent run.
I think I did this correctly, submodules are so annoying.
r? kobzol
(opening as draft to do a perf run and check that nothing has changed indeed)
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #134074 (bootstrap: `std::io::ErrorKind::CrossesDevices` is finally stable)
- #135236 (Update a bunch of library types for MCP807)
- #135301 (re-add a warning for old master branch, but with much simpler logic)
- #135324 (Initial fs module for uefi)
- #135326 (support target specific `optimized-compiler-builtins`)
- #135347 (Use `NonNull::without_provenance` within the standard library)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Use `NonNull::without_provenance` within the standard library
This API removes the need for several `unsafe` blocks, and leads to clearer code. It uses feature `nonnull_provenance` (#135243).
Close#135343
Initial fs module for uefi
- Just a copy of unsupported fs right now to reduce the noise from future PRs to allow for easier review.
- For the full working version of fs on uefi, see [0]
- This is an effort to break the original PR (#129700) into much smaller chunks for faster upstreaming.
[0]: https://github.com/Ayush1325/rust/tree/uefi-file-full
re-add a warning for old master branch, but with much simpler logic
instead of calling into git or checking the modification time of files, simply print the warning if there is a very large number of "modified" files.
also make the wording much softer, so false positives are less alarming.
(warning was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134935)
Update a bunch of library types for MCP807
This greatly reduces the number of places that actually use the `rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_*` attributes down to just 3:
```
library/core\src\ptr\non_null.rs
68:#[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start(1)]
library/core\src\num\niche_types.rs
19: #[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start($low)]
20: #[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_end($high)]
```
Everything else -- PAL Nanoseconds, alloc's `Cap`, niched FDs, etc -- all just wrap those `niche_types` types.
r? ghost
Add an InstSimplify for repetitive array expressions
I noticed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135068#issuecomment-2569955426 that GVN's implementation of this same transform was quite profitable on the deep-vector benchmark. But of course GVN doesn't run in unoptimized builds, so this is my attempt to write a version of this transform that benefits the deep-vector case and is fast enough to run in InstSimplify.
The benchmark suite indicates that this is effective.
Use llvm.memset.p0i8.* to initialize all same-bytes arrays
Similar to #43488
debug builds can now handle `0x0101_u16` and other multi-byte scalars that have all the same bytes (instead of special casing just `0`)
mir_transform: implement `#[rustc_force_inline]`
Adds `#[rustc_force_inline]` which is similar to always inlining but reports an error if the inlining was not possible.
- `#[rustc_force_inline]` can only be applied to free functions to guarantee that the MIR inliner will be able to resolve calls.
- `rustc_mir_transform::inline::Inline` is refactored into two passes (`Inline` and `ForceInline`), sharing the vast majority of the implementation.
- `rustc_mir_transform::inline::ForceInline` can't be disabled so annotated items are always inlined.
- `rustc_mir_transform::inline::ForceInline` runs regardless of optimisation level.
- `#[rustc_force_inline]` won't inline unless target features match, as with normal inlining.
- MIR validation will ICE if a `#[rustc_force_inline]` isn't inlined, to guarantee that it will never be codegened independently. As a further guarantee, monomorphisation collection will always decide that `#[rustc_force_inline]` functions cannot be codegened locally.
- Like other intrinsics, `#[rustc_force_inline]` annotated functions cannot be cast to function pointers.
- As with other rustc attrs, this cannot be used by users, just within the compiler and standard library.
- This is only implemented within rustc, so should avoid any limitations of LLVM's inlining.
It is intended that this attribute be used with intrinsics that must be inlined for security reasons. For example, pointer authentication intrinsics would allow Rust users to make use of pointer authentication instructions, but if these intrinsic functions were in the binary then they could be used as gadgets with ROP attacks, defeating the point of introducing them. We don't have any intrinsics like this today, but I expect to upstream some once a force inlining mechanism such as this is available.
cc rust-lang/rust#131687rust-lang/rfcs#3711 - this approach should resolve the concerns from these previous attempts
r? `@saethlin`
Adds `#[rustc_force_inline]` which is similar to always inlining but
reports an error if the inlining was not possible, and which always
attempts to inline annotated items, regardless of optimisation levels.
It can only be applied to free functions to guarantee that the MIR
inliner will be able to resolve calls.
Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift
This has a couple of changes that will conflict with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134338.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132607 (Used pthread name functions returning result for FreeBSD and DragonFly)
- #134693 (proc_macro: Use `ToTokens` trait in `quote` macro)
- #134732 (Unify conditional-const error reporting with non-const error reporting)
- #135083 (Do not ICE when encountering predicates from other items in method error reporting)
- #135251 (Only treat plain literal patterns as short)
- #135320 (Fix typo in `#[coroutine]` gating error)
- #135321 (remove more redundant into() conversions)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not ICE when encountering predicates from other items in method error reporting
See the comments I left in the code and the test file.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124350
Unify conditional-const error reporting with non-const error reporting
This PR unifies the error reporting between `ConditionallyConstCall` and `FnCallNonConst` so that the former will refer to syntactical sugar like operators by their sugared name, rather than calling all operators "methods". We achieve this by making the "non-const" part of the error message generic over the "non" part so we can plug in "conditionally" instead.
This should ensure that as we constify traits in the standard library, we don't regress error messages for things like `==`.
r? fmease or reassign
proc_macro: Use `ToTokens` trait in `quote` macro
Tracking issues: #130977, #54722
This PR changed `proc_macro::quote!` to use `ToTokens` trait instead of `TokenStream::from`, and migrated test cases from `quote` crate.
r? `@dtolnay`
CC `@tgross35`
Used pthread name functions returning result for FreeBSD and DragonFly
`pthread_getname_np` and `pthread_setname_np` received a wider adoption in past years and was added to:
* FreeBSD by June 11 2020 via [`2ef84b7da9a6c3e23b4a135e6e863581f16d46e1`](2ef84b7da9),
* DargonFly by March 8 2021 via [`ab5dc9aceb34419d1c4b6006739e61acee8ee999`](https://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly.git/commitdiff/ab5dc9aceb34419d1c4b6006739e61acee8ee999).
There's not so much advantage except that the result can be checked in debug builds. Ideally it should be unified with Linux' implementation, but it trims the input.
Remove special-casing for argument patterns in MIR typeck (attempt to fix perf regression of #133858)
See [my comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133858#issuecomment-2579029618) on #133858 for more information. This is just a guess as to what went wrong, and I haven't been able to get the profiler running locally, so I'll need a perf run to make sure this actually helps.
There's one test's stderr that suffers a bit, but this was just papering over the issue anyway. Making region errors point to the correct constraints in the presence of invariance/contravariance is a broader problem; the current way it's handled is mostly based on guesswork, luck, and hoping it works out. Properly handling that (somehow) would improve the test's stderr without the hack that this PR reverts.
