Stabilize `std::io::ErrorKind::CrossesDevices`
FCP in #130191
cc #86442
See #130191 for more info and a recap of what has happened up until now.
TLDR: This had been FCP'd in December 2022 with some other `ErrorKind`s, but the stabilization got postponed due to some concerns voiced about several of the variants. However, the only concern ever voiced for this variant in particular was a wish to rename this to `NotSameDevice` analogous to Windows's `ERROR_NOT_SAME_DEVICE` (as opposed to Unix's `EXDEV`). This suggestion did not receive any support. So let's try to FCP this as is.
r? libs-api
Sync cg clif 2024 12 06
The main highlights this time are a Cranelift update disabling the clif ir verifier by default for better performance.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #130777 (rust_for_linux: -Zreg-struct-return commandline flag for X86 (#116973))
- #133211 (Extend Miri to correctly pass mutable pointers through FFI)
- #133790 (Improve documentation for Vec::extend_from_within)
- #133930 (rustbook: update to use new mdbook-trpl package from The Book)
- #133931 (Only allow PassMode::Direct for aggregates on wasm when using the C ABI)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Only allow PassMode::Direct for aggregates on wasm when using the C ABI
For the Rust ABI we don't have any ABI compat reasons to allow PassMode::Direct for aggregates.
rustbook: update to use new mdbook-trpl package from The Book
Updates to the latest merge from `rust-lang/book` and simplifies the dependency chain there. There are now three preprocessors, but only one package, so everything is a lot nicer to deal with from the consuming POV (i.e. here).
Extend Miri to correctly pass mutable pointers through FFI
Based off of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129684, this PR further extends Miri to execute native calls that make use of pointers to *mutable* memory.
We adapt Miri's bookkeeping of internal state upon any FFI call that gives external code permission to mutate memory.
Native code may now possibly write and therefore initialize and change the pointer provenance of bytes it has access to: Such memory is assumed to be *initialized* afterwards and bytes are given *arbitrary (wildcard) provenance*. This enables programs that correctly use mutating FFI calls to run Miri without errors, at the cost of possibly missing Undefined Behaviour caused by incorrect usage of mutating FFI.
> <details>
>
> <summary> Simple example </summary>
>
> ```rust
> extern "C" {
> fn init_int(ptr: *mut i32);
> }
>
> fn main() {
> let mut x = std::mem::MaybeUninit::<i32>::uninit();
> let x = unsafe {
> init_int(x.as_mut_ptr());
> x.assume_init()
> };
>
> println!("C initialized my memory to: {x}");
> }
> ```
> ```c
> void init_int(int *ptr) {
> *ptr = 42;
> }
> ```
> should now show `C initialized my memory to: 42`.
>
> </details>
r? ``@RalfJung``
rust_for_linux: -Zreg-struct-return commandline flag for X86 (#116973)
Command line flag `-Zreg-struct-return` for X86 (32-bit) for rust-for-linux.
This flag enables the same behavior as the `abi_return_struct_as_int` target spec key.
- Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116973
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132155 (Always display first line of impl blocks even when collapsed)
- #133256 (CI: use free runners for i686-gnu jobs)
- #133607 (implement checks for tail calls)
- #133821 (Replace black with ruff in `tidy`)
- #133827 (CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.13-rc1)
- #133910 (Normalize target-cpus.rs stdout test for LLVM changes)
- #133921 (Adapt codegen tests for NUW inference)
- #133936 (Avoid fetching the anon const hir node that is already available)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Adapt codegen tests for NUW inference
These were broken by 462cb3cd6c
Let me know if you think we should have a FIXME / tracking issue to update the tests after the LLVM 20 upgrade to make these required.
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
r? `@nikic`
Normalize target-cpus.rs stdout test for LLVM changes
LLVM has recently added support for the `lime1` CPU in 35cce408ee, so the `target-cpus.rs` test currently produces different output depending on the LLVM version.
This CL adds a normalization directive, to remove the new CPU from the output list.
Alternatives fixes I can think of:
* Add two revisions of the test (one per LLVM version)
* Ignore the test on one of the LLVM versions
* I dislike this, because it's possible that the test won't get updated for the next LLVM version.
I don't think the exact list of target CPUs is relevant for this test, so it shouldn't be too bad if the normalization sticks around longer than necessary.
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.13-rc1
Linux v6.13-rc1 contains commit 28e848386b92 ("rust: block: fix formatting of `kernel::block::mq::request` module"), which in turn contains commit c95bbb59a9b2 ("rust: enable arbitrary_self_types and remove `Receiver`"), which is why we had a hash rather than a tag.
r? ```@Kobzol``` ```@lqd```
try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
```@rustbot``` label A-rust-for-linux
```@bors``` try
Replace black with ruff in `tidy`
`ruff` can both lint and format Python code (in fact, it should be a mostly drop-in replacement for `black` in terms of formatting), so it's not needed to use `black` anymore. This PR removes `black` and replaces it with `ruff`, to get rid of one Python dependency, and also to make Python formatting faster (although that's a small thing).
If we decide to merge this, we'll need to "reformat the world" - `ruff` is not perfectly compatible with `black`, and it also looks like `black` was actually ignoring some files before. I tried it locally (`./x test tidy --extra-checks=py:fmt --bless`) and it also reformatted some code in subtrees (e.g. `clippy` or `rustc_codegen_gcc`) - I'm not sure how to handle that.
implement checks for tail calls
Quoting the [RFC draft](https://github.com/phi-go/rfcs/blob/guaranteed-tco/text/0000-explicit-tail-calls.md):
> The argument to become is a function (or method) call, that exactly matches the function signature and calling convention of the callee. The intent is to ensure a matching ABI. Note that lifetimes may differ as long as they pass borrow checking, see [below](https://github.com/phi-go/rfcs/blob/guaranteed-tco/text/0000-explicit-tail-calls.md#return-type-coercion) for specifics on the return type.
> Tail calling closures and tail calling from closures is not allowed. This is due to the high implementation effort, see below, this restriction can be lifted by a future RFC.
> Invocations of operators were considered as valid targets but were rejected on grounds of being too error-prone. In any case, these can still be called as methods.
> Tail calling [variadic functions](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/unstable-book/language-features/c-variadic.html) and tail calling from variadic functions is not allowed. As support for variadic function is stabilized on a per target level, support for tail-calls regarding variadic functions would need to follow a similar approach. To avoid this complexity and to minimize implementation effort for backends, this interaction is currently not allowed but support can be added with a future RFC.
-----
The checks are implemented as a query, similarly to `check_unsafety`.
The code is cherry-picked straight out of #112657 which was written more than a year ago, so I expect we might need to change some things ^^"
Fix missing newlines that rustfmt removed.
fix trailing whitespace
Fix duplicate word.
Reformat panic reasons into a list
remove trailing whitespace 2 electric boogaloo
Change verbe tense.
Integrate suggestions
This reverts commit 65c5c7f8cf.
It unfortunately regresses the size of the target dir by a non-trivial
amount. It could be re-enabled again once each subsection doesn't get a
unique name anymore.
skip `setup::Hook` on non-git sources
Running `setup::Hook` (with `x setup`) leads tarball sources to panic and this PR resolves that problem by skipping `Hook` step on non-git sources.
Improve bootstrap job objects
This attempts to fix a few comments on bootstrap job objects.
I also fixed an issue where if duplicating the job object handle into the python process failed, it would close the job object. This would then result in the job object closing all attached processes, which at that point includes the current process. The fix is to simply never close the job object handle at any point after the current process is assigned to it.
Improve comments for the default backtrace printer
The existing comments were misleading, confusing, and outdated.
Take this comment for example:
```
// Any frames between `__rust_begin_short_backtrace` and `__rust_end_short_backtrace`
// are omitted from the backtrace in short mode, `__rust_end_short_backtrace` will be
// called before the panic hook, so we won't ignore any frames if there is no
// invoke of `__rust_begin_short_backtrace`.
```
this is just wrong. here is an example (full) backtrace:
<details>
```
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.01s
Running `/home/jyn/.local/lib/cargo/target/debug/example`
called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value
stack backtrace:
0: 0x56499698c595 - std::backtrace_rs::backtrace::libunwind::trace::h5ef2cc16e9a7415a
1: 0x56499698c595 - std::backtrace_rs::backtrace::trace_unsynchronized::h9b5e016e9075f714
2: 0x56499698c595 - std::sys_common::backtrace::_print_fmt::h2f62c7f9ff224e93
3: 0x56499698c595 - <std::sys_common::backtrace::_print::DisplayBacktrace as core::fmt::Display>::fmt::hbe51682735731910
4: 0x5649969aa26b - core::fmt::rt::Argument::fmt::h1994ab2b310d665e
5: 0x5649969aa26b - core::fmt::write::hade58a36d63468d7
6: 0x56499698a43f - std::io::Write::write_fmt::h16145587d801a9ab
7: 0x56499698c36e - std::sys_common::backtrace::_print::ha8082e56201dadb4
8: 0x56499698c36e - std::sys_common::backtrace::print::he30f96b4e7f6cbfd
9: 0x56499698d709 - std::panicking::default_hook::{{closure}}::hf0801f6b18a968d3
10: 0x56499698d4ac - std::panicking::default_hook::hd2defec7eda5aeb0
11: 0x56499698dc31 - std::panicking::rust_panic_with_hook::hde93283600065c53
12: 0x56499698daf3 - std::panicking::begin_panic_handler::{{closure}}::h5e151adbdb7ec0c1
13: 0x56499698ca59 - std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_end_short_backtrace::he36a1407e0f77700
14: 0x56499698d7d4 - rust_begin_unwind
15: 0x5649969a9503 - core::panicking::panic_fmt::h2380d41365f95412
16: 0x5649969a958c - core::panicking::panic::h38cf8db80e8c6e67
17: 0x5649969a93e9 - core::option::unwrap_failed::he72696e53ff29a05
18: 0x5649969722b6 - core::option::Option<T>::unwrap::hb574dc0dc1703062
19: 0x5649969722b6 - example::main::h7a867aafacd93d75
20: 0x5649969721db - core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once::h734f99a5e57291b7
21: 0x56499697226e - std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::h02f5d58c351c4756
22: 0x564996972241 - std::rt::lang_start::{{closure}}::h8b134fe2c31a4355
23: 0x564996988662 - core::ops::function::impls::<impl core::ops::function::FnOnce<A> for &F>::call_once::h88d7bb571ee2aaf4
24: 0x564996988662 - std::panicking::try::do_call::hfb78dfb6599c871d
25: 0x564996988662 - std::panicking::try::habd041c8c4c8e50c
27: 0x564996988662 - std::rt::lang_start_internal::{{closure}}::h227591a6f9c0879e
28: 0x564996988662 - std::panicking::try::do_call::h3c5878333c38916a
29: 0x564996988662 - std::panicking::try::h5af7b3a127cdae70
31: 0x564996988662 - std::rt::lang_start_internal::hbc85e809eeace0dd
32: 0x56499697221a - std::rt::lang_start::ha1eb16922c9cb224
33: 0x5649969722ee - main
34: 0x7f031962a1ca - __libc_start_call_main
35: 0x7f031962a28b - __libc_start_main_impl
36: 0x5649969720a5 - _start
37: 0x0 - <unknown>
```
</details>
note particularly frames 13-21, from start_backtrace to end_backtrace. with PrintFmt::Short, these are the *only* frames that are printed; i.e. we are doing the exact opposite of the comment.
r? ``@saethlin``
