Fix enzyme build errors
After [this PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136428) was merged, I switched to master and attempted building `./x.py build --stage 1 library` with the config mentioned in the enzyme rustbook but it resulted in some errors tho the config.example.toml build succeeded
The errors were re:
### 1. Use of ref in match patterns
The errors were related to match ergonomics in Rust 2024, where ref is no longer needed when matching on references. Examples:
```
error: binding modifiers may only be written when the default binding mode is `move`
--> compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/autodiff.rs:136:31
|
136 | Annotatable::Item(ref iitem) => {
| ^^^ binding modifier not allowed under `ref` default binding mode
|
= note: for more information, see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/edition-guide/rust-2024/match-ergonomics.html>
note: matching on a reference type with a non-reference pattern changes the default binding mode
--> compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/autodiff.rs:136:13
|
136 | Annotatable::Item(ref iitem) => {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this matches on type `&_`
help: remove the unnecessary binding modifier
|
136 - Annotatable::Item(ref iitem) => {
136 + Annotatable::Item(iitem) => {
|
error: binding modifiers may only be written when the default binding mode is `move`
--> compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/autodiff.rs:146:36
|
146 | Annotatable::AssocItem(ref assoc_item, _) => {
| ^^^ binding modifier not allowed under `ref` default binding mode
|
= note: for more information, see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/edition-guide/rust-2024/match-ergonomics.html>
note: matching on a reference type with a non-reference pattern changes the default binding mode
--> compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/autodiff.rs:146:13
|
146 | Annotatable::AssocItem(ref assoc_item, _) => {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this matches on type `&_`
help: remove the unnecessary binding modifier
|
146 - Annotatable::AssocItem(ref assoc_item, _) => {
146 + Annotatable::AssocItem(assoc_item, _) => {
|
error: binding modifiers may only be written when the default binding mode is `move`
--> compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/autodiff.rs:174:31
|
174 | ... Annotatable::Item(ref iitem) => (iitem.vis.clone(), iitem.ide...
| ^^^ binding modifier not allowed under `ref` default binding mode
|
= note: for more information, see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/edition-guide/rust-2024/match-ergonomics.html>
note: matching on a reference type with a non-reference pattern changes the default binding mode
--> compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/autodiff.rs:174:13
|
174 | ... Annotatable::Item(ref iitem) => (iitem.vis.clone(), iitem.ident.c...
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this matches on type `&_`
help: remove the unnecessary binding modifier
|
174 - Annotatable::Item(ref iitem) => (iitem.vis.clone(), iitem.ident.clone()),
174 + Annotatable::Item(iitem) => (iitem.vis.clone(), iitem.ident.clone()),
|
error: binding modifiers may only be written when the default binding mode is `move`
--> compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/autodiff.rs:175:36
|
175 | Annotatable::AssocItem(ref assoc_item, _) => {
| ^^^ binding modifier not allowed under `ref` default binding mode
|
= note: for more information, see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/edition-guide/rust-2024/match-ergonomics.html>
note: matching on a reference type with a non-reference pattern changes the default binding mode
--> compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/autodiff.rs:175:13
|
175 | Annotatable::AssocItem(ref assoc_item, _) => {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this matches on type `&_`
help: remove the unnecessary binding modifier
|
175 - Annotatable::AssocItem(ref assoc_item, _) => {
175 + Annotatable::AssocItem(assoc_item, _) => {
|
error: could not compile `rustc_builtin_macros` (lib) due to 4 previous errors
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:19:39
```
### 2. the use of external C blocks without unsafe in compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm/enzyme_ffi.rs (I don't have the error message handy)
The first commit fixes the errors above
---
## Additional Improvement:
`@ZuseZ4` suggested we consolidate the variants under `#[cfg(llvm_enzyme)]` and `#[cfg(not(llvm_enzyme))]` by conditionally checking for `cfg!(llvm_enzyme)` instead. This way, the autodiff code is compiled but not executed avoiding such regressions
r? `@ZuseZ4`
cc: `@oli-obk`
Clean up TypeckResults::extract_binding_mode
- Remove the `Option` from the result type, as `None` is never returned.
- Document the difference from the `BindingMode` in `PatKind::Binding`.
solver cycles are coinductive once they have one coinductive step
Implements the new cycle semantics in the new solver, dealing with the fallout from https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/10.
The first commit has been extensively fuzzed via https://github.com/lcnr/search_graph_fuzz.
A trait solver cycle is now coinductive if it has at least one *coinductive step*. A step is only considered coinductive if it's a where-clause of an impl of a coinductive trait. The only coinductive traits are `Sized` and auto traits.
This differs from the current stable because where a cycle had to consist of exclusively coinductive goals. This is overly limiting and wasn't properly enforced as it (mostly) ignored all non-trait goals.
A more in-depth explanation of my reasoning can be found in this separate doc: https://gist.github.com/lcnr/c49d887bbd34f5d05c36d1cf7a1bf5a5. A summary:
- imagine using dictionary passing style: map where-bounds to additional "dictonary" fn arguments instead of monomorphization
- impls are the only source of truth and introduce a *constructor* of the dictionary type
- a trait goal holds if mapping its proof tree to dictionary passing style results in a valid corecursive function
- a corecursive function is valid if it is guarded: matching on it should result in a constructor in a finite amount of time. This property should recursively hold for all fields of the constructor
- a function is guarded if the recursive call is *behind* a constructor
- **and** this constructor is not *moved out of*, e.g. by accessing a field of the dictionary
- the "not moved out of" condition is difficult to guarantee in general, e.g. for item bounds of associated types. However, there is no way to *move out* of an auto trait as there is no information you can get from *the inside of* an auto trait bound in the trait system
- if we encounter a cycle/recursive call which involves an auto trait, we can always convert the proof tree into a non-recursive function which calls a corecursive function whose first step is the construction of the auto trait dict and which only recursively depends on itself (by inlining the original function until they reach the uses of the auto trait)
**we can therefore make any cycle during which we step into an auto trait (or `Sized`) impl coinductive**
----
To fix https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/10 we could go with a more restrictive version which tries to restrict cycles to only allow code already supported on stable, potentially forcing cycles to be ambiguous if they step through an impl-where clause of a non-coinductive trait.
`PathKind` should be a strictly ordered set to allow merging paths without worry. We could therefore add another variant `PathKind::ForceUnknown` which is greater than `PathKind::Coinductive`. We already have to add such a third `PathKind` in #137314 anyways.
I am not doing this here due to multiple reasons:
- I cannot think of a principled reason why cycles using an impl to normalize differ in any way from simply using that impl to prove a trait bound. It feels unnecessary and like it makes it more difficult to reason about our cycle semantics :<
- This PR does not affect stable as coherence doesn't care about whether a goal holds or is ambiguous. So we don't yet have to make a final decision
r? `@compiler-errors` `@nikomatsakis`
fix: overflowing bin hex
**Overview:**
- This PR fixes#135404.
**Testing**
- Tested the updated functionality.
- previously emitted diagnostics:
```bash
error: literal out of range for `i32`
--> src/main.rs:2:9
|
2 | _ = 0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFE;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the literal `0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFE` (decimal `10376293541461622782`) does not fit into the type `i32` and will become `-2i32`
= help: consider using the type `i128` instead
= note: `#[deny(overflowing_literals)]` on by default
help: to use as a negative number (decimal `-2`), consider using the type `u32` for the literal and cast it to `i32`
|
2 | _ = 0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFEu32 as i32;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
- current diagnostics:
```bash
error: literal out of range for `i32`
--> ../temp.rs:2:13
|
2 | let x = 0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFE;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: the literal `0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFE` (decimal `10376293541461622782`) does not fit into the type `i32` and will become `-2i32`
= help: consider using the type `u64` instead
= note: `#[deny(overflowing_literals)]` on by default
help: to use as a negative number (decimal `-2`), consider using the type `u64` for the literal and cast it to `i32`
|
2 | let x = 0x8FFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFEu64 as i32;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
A cycle was previously coinductive if all steps were coinductive.
Change this to instead considerm cycles to be coinductive if they
step through at least one where-bound of an impl of a coinductive
trait goal.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136542 ([`compiletest`-related cleanups 4/7] Make the distinction between root build directory vs test suite specific build directory in compiletest less confusing)
- #136579 (Fix UB in ThinVec::flat_map_in_place)
- #136688 (require trait impls to have matching const stabilities as the traits)
- #136846 (Make `AssocOp` more like `ExprKind`)
- #137304 (add `IntoBounds::intersect` and `RangeBounds::is_empty`)
- #137455 (Reuse machinery from `tail_expr_drop_order` for `if_let_rescope`)
- #137480 (Return unexpected termination error instead of panicing in `Thread::join`)
- #137694 (Spruce up `AttributeKind` docs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Provide a better suggestion message, and make the suggestion verbose.
```
error[E0703]: invalid ABI: found `riscv-interrupt`
--> $DIR/riscv-discoverability-guidance.rs:17:8
|
LL | extern "riscv-interrupt" fn isr() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ invalid ABI
|
= note: invoke `rustc --print=calling-conventions` for a full list of supported calling conventions
help: there's a similarly named valid ABI `"riscv-interrupt-m"`
|
LL | extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr() {}
| ++
```
Don't infer attributes of virtual calls based on the function body
Fixes (after backport) #137646.
Since we don't know the exact implementation of the virtual call, it might write to parameters, we can't infer the readonly attribute.
Note: there was an existing code path involving `Interpolated` in
`MetaItem::from_tokens` that was dead. This commit transfers that to the
new form, but puts an `unreachable!` call inside it.
The one notable test change is `tests/ui/macros/trace_faulty_macros.rs`.
This commit removes the complicated `Interpolated` handling in
`expected_expression_found` that results in a longer error message. But
I think the new, shorter message is actually an improvement.
The original complaint was in #71039, when the error message started
with "error: expected expression, found `1 + 1`". That was confusing
because `1 + 1` is an expression. Other than that, the reporter said
"the whole error message is not too bad if you ignore the first line".
Subsequently, extra complexity and wording was added to the error
message. But I don't think the extra wording actually helps all that
much. In particular, it still says of the `1+1` that "this is expected
to be expression". This repeats the problem from the original complaint!
This commit removes the extra complexity, reverting to a simpler error
message. This is primarily because the traversal is a pain without
`Interpolated` tokens. Nonetheless, I think the error message is
*improved*. It now starts with "expected expression, found `pat`
metavariable", which is much clearer and the real problem. It also
doesn't say anything specific about `1+1`, which is good, because the
`1+1` isn't really relevant to the error -- it's the `$e:pat` that's
important.
That unstable feature completed fcp-close, so the compiler needs to be
migrated away to allow its removal. In this case, `cg_llvm` and `cg_gcc`
were using raw entries to optimize their `const_str_cache` lookup and
insertion. We can change that to separate `get` and (on miss) `insert`
calls, so we still have the fast path avoiding string allocation when
the cache hits.
Spruce up `AttributeKind` docs
- Remove dead link to `rustc_attr` crate.
- Add link to `rustc_attr_parsing` crate.
- Split up first paragraph so it looks better at crate-level summary
r? `@jdonszelmann`
Reuse machinery from `tail_expr_drop_order` for `if_let_rescope`
Namely, it defines its own `extract_component_with_significant_dtor` which is a bit more accurate than `Ty::has_significant_drop`, since it has a hard-coded list of types from the ecosystem which are opted out of the lint.[^a]
Also, since we extract the dtors themselves, adopt the same *label* we use in `tail_expr_drop_order` to point out the destructor impl. This makes it much clear what's actually being dropped, so it should be clearer to know when it's a false positive.
This conflicts with #137444, but I will rebase whichever lands first.
[^a]: Side-note, it's kinda a shame that now there are two functions that presumably do the same thing. But this isn't my circus, nor are these my monkeys.
require trait impls to have matching const stabilities as the traits
This resolves https://github.com/rust-lang/project-const-traits/issues/5 by implementing the suggested solution in the given thread
r? ``@RalfJung``
cc ``@rust-lang/project-const-traits``
Fix UB in ThinVec::flat_map_in_place
`thin_vec.as_ptr()` goes through the `Deref` impl of `ThinVec`, which will not allow access to any memory as we did call `set_len(0)` first.
Found in the process of investigating https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135870.
