Stop using `MoveDataParamEnv` for places that don't need a param-env
I think not threading through a `ParamEnv` makes it clearer that these functions don't do anything particularly "type systems"-y.
r? cjgillot
This is an alternative to ee6459d6521cf6a4c2e08b6e13ce3c6ce5d55ed0.
That is, it fixes the issue that affects the very long type names
in https://docs.rs/async-stripe/0.31.0/stripe/index.html#structs.
This is, necessarily, a pile of nasty heuristics.
We need to balance a few issues:
- Sometimes, there's no real word break.
For example, `BTreeMap` should be `BTree<wbr>Map`,
not `B<wbr>Tree<wbr>Map`.
- Sometimes, there's a legit word break,
but the name is tiny and the HTML overhead isn't worth it.
For example, if we're typesetting `TyCtx`,
writing `Ty<wbr>Ctx` would have an HTML overhead of 50%.
Line breaking inside it makes no sense.
Perform instsimplify before inline to eliminate some trivial calls
I am currently working on #128081. In the current pipeline, we can get the following clone statements ([godbolt](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/931316fhP)):
```
bb0: {
StorageLive(_2);
_2 = ((*_1).0: i32);
StorageLive(_3);
_3 = ((*_1).1: u64);
_0 = Foo { a: move _2, b: move _3 };
StorageDead(_3);
StorageDead(_2);
return;
}
```
Analyzing such statements will be simple and fast. We don't need to consider branches or some interfering statements. However, this requires us to run `InstSimplify`, `ReferencePropagation`, and `SimplifyCFG` at least once. I can introduce a new pass, but I think the best place for it would be within `InstSimplify`.
I put `InstSimplify` before `Inline`, which takes some of the burden away from `Inline`.
r? `@saethlin`
CI: move RFL job forward to v6.11-rc1
The tag has been released today, and since the original hash we had in the Rust CI (which was ~v6.10-rc1), we have accumulated a fair amount of changes and new code.
In particular, v6.11-rc1 is the first Linux tag where the kernel is supporting an actual minimum Rust version (1.78.0), rather than a single version.
---
Let's try to do the move independently first.
r? ``@Kobzol``
try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
Clean and enable `rustdoc::unescaped_backticks` for `core/alloc/std/test/proc_macro`
I am not sure if the lint is supposed to be "ready enough" (since it is `allow` by default), but it does catch a couple issues in `core` (`alloc`, `std`, `test` and `proc_macro` are already clean), so I propose making it `warn` in all the crates rendered in the website.
Cc: `@GuillaumeGomez`
Isolate the diagnostic code that expects `thir::Pat` to be printable
Currently, `thir::Pat` implements `fmt::Display` (and `IntoDiagArg`) directly, for use by a few diagnostics.
That makes it tricky to experiment with alternate representations for THIR patterns, because the patterns currently need to be printable on their own. That immediately rules out possibilities like storing subpatterns as a `PatId` index into a central list (instead of the current directly-owned `Box<Pat>`).
This PR therefore takes an incremental step away from that obstacle, by removing `thir::Pat` from diagnostic structs in `rustc_pattern_analysis`, and hiding the pattern-printing process behind a single public `Pat::to_string` method. Doing so makes it easier to identify and update the code that wants to print patterns, and gives a place to pass in additional context in the future if necessary.
---
I'm currently not sure whether switching over to `PatId` is actually desirable or not, but I think this change makes sense on its own merits, by reducing the coupling between `thir::Pat` and the pattern-analysis error types.
miri: fix offset_from behavior on wildcard pointers
offset_from wouldn't behave correctly when the "end" pointer was a wildcard pointer (result of an int2ptr cast) just at the end of the allocation. Fix that by expressing the "same allocation" check in terms of two `check_ptr_access_signed` instead of something specific to offset_from, which is both more canonical and works better with wildcard pointers.
The second commit just improves diagnostics: I wanted the "pointer is dangling (has no provenance)" message to say how many bytes of memory it expected to see (since if it were 0 bytes, this would actually be legal, so it's good to tell the user that it's not 0 bytes). And then I was annoying that the error looks so different for when you deref a dangling pointer vs an out-of-bounds pointer so I made them more similar.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3767
handle no_std targets on std builds
This PR unifies the `Step::run_make` logic and improves it by skipping std specific crates for no_std targets. In addition, since we now handle library crates properly, bootstrap is capable of running `x doc library` even for no_std targets as it is able to generate documentation for `alloc` crate from the standard library.
Resolves#128027
cc ``@ChrisDenton``
`crates` field is handled in the `Step::make_run` just like in any other
`Std` implementation, so we don't need to resolve them in `Std::new`.
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Since we now handle library crates properly, there's no need to panic for `no_std`
targets anymore.
`x doc library` now generates documentation for the `alloc` crate from standard library.
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
This change unifies the `Step::run_make` logic and improves it by skipping
std specific crates for no_std targets.
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Update compiler_builtins to 0.1.114
The `weak-intrinsics` feature was removed from compiler_builtins in https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/598, so dropped the `compiler-builtins-weak-intrinsics` feature from alloc/std/sysroot.
In https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/593, some builtins for f16/f128 were added. These don't work for all compiler backends, so add a `compiler-builtins-no-f16-f128` feature and disable it for cranelift and gcc.
std: unsafe-wrap personality::dwarf::eh
Moves the forbiddance up a little. This is another largely whitespace diff, except for hoisting some variable declarations to allow enclosing the `unsafe {}` scope fully and make it clearer where the bounds of some temporaries are.
Replace `io::Cursor::{remaining_slice, is_empty}`
This is a late follow up to the concerns raised in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86369.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86369#issuecomment-953096691
> This API seems focussed on the `Read` side of things. When `Seek`ing around and `Write`ing data, `is_empty` becomes confusing and `remaining_slice` is not very useful. When writing, the part of the slice before the cursor is much more interesting. Maybe we should have functions for both? Or a single function that returns both slices? (If we also have a `mut` version, a single function would be useful to allow mutable access to both sides at once.)
New feature name: `cursor_remaining` > `cursor_split`.
Added functions:
```rust
fn split(&self) -> (&[u8], &[u8]);
// fn before(&self) -> &[u8];
// fn after(&self) -> &[u8];
fn split_mut(&mut self) -> (&mut [u8], &mut [u8]);
// fn before_mut(&mut self) -> &mut [u8];
// fn after_mut(&mut self) -> &mut [u8];
```
A question was raised in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86369#issuecomment-927124211 about whether to return a lifetime that would reflect the lifetime of the underlying bytes (`impl Cursor<&'a [u8]> { fn after(&self) -> &'a [u8] }`). The downside of doing this would be that it would not be possible to implement these functions generically over `T: AsRef<[u8]>`.
## Update
Based on the review, before* and after* methods where removed.
This gives a clearer view of the (diagnostic) code that expects to be able to
print THIR patterns, and makes it possible to experiment with requiring some
kind of context (for ID lookup) when printing patterns.
rustfmt `use` declarations
This PR implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/750, which changes how `use` declarations are formatted by adding these options to `rustfmt.toml`:
```
group_imports = "StdExternalCrate"
imports_granularity = "Module"
```
r? `@ghost`
The `weak-intrinsics` feature was removed from compiler_builtins in
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/598, so dropped the
`compiler-builtins-weak-intrinsics` feature from alloc/std/sysroot.
In https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/593, some
builtins for f16/f128 were added. These don't work for all compiler
backends, so add a `compiler-builtins-no-f16-f128` feature and disable
it for cranelift and gcc. Also disable it for LLVM targets that don't
support it.
The tag has been released today, and since the original hash we had in
the Rust CI (which was ~v6.10-rc1), we have accumulated a fair amount
of changes and new code.
In particular, v6.11-rc1 is the first Linux tag where the kernel is
supporting an actual minimum Rust version (1.78.0), rather than a
single version.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
There are only 3 cases across the crates rendered in the website (`core`,
`alloc`, `std`, `proc_macro` and `test`), and they are all in `core`.
Clean them up, so that the lint can be enabled in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
As decided in rust-lang/compiler-team#750.
Use declarations are currently wildly inconsistent because rustfmt is
quite unopinionated about how they should be formatted. The
`rustfmt.toml` additions makes rustfmt more opinionated, which avoids
the need for any decision when adding new use declarations to a file.
This commit only updates `rustfmt.toml` and
`compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift/rustfmt.toml`. The next commit will do
the reformatting.
Add links from `assert_eq!` docs to `debug_assert_eq!`, etc.
This adds information and links from the docs for the following macros to their debug-only versions:
* `assert_eq!`
* `assert_ne!`
* `assert_matches!`
This matches the existing documentation for the `assert!` macro.
Stabilize `const_waker`
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102012.
For `local_waker` and `context_ext` related things, I just ~~moved them to dedicated feature gates and reused their own tracking issue (maybe it's better to open a new one later, but at least they should not be tracked under https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102012 from the beginning IMO.)~~ reused their own feature gates as suggested by ``@tgross35.``
``@rustbot`` label: +T-libs-api
r? libs-api
