Add richer structure for Stable MIR Projections
Resolves https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/issues/49.
Projections in Stable MIR are currently just strings. This PR replaces that representation with a richer structure, namely projections become vectors of `ProjectionElem`s, just as in MIR. The `ProjectionElem` enum is heavily based off of the MIR `ProjectionElem`.
This PR is a draft since there are several outstanding issues to resolve, including:
- How should `UserTypeProjection`s be represented in Stable MIR? In MIR, the projections are just a vector of `ProjectionElem<(),()>`, meaning `ProjectionElem`s that don't have Local or Type arguments (for `Index`, `Field`, etc. objects). Should `UserTypeProjection`s be represented this way in Stable MIR as well? Or is there a more user-friendly representation that wouldn't drag along all the `ProjectionElem` variants that presumably can't appear?
- What is the expected behavior of a `Place`'s `ty` function? Should it resolve down the chain of projections so that something like `*_1.f` would return the type referenced by field `f`?
- Tests should be added for `UserTypeProjection`
Also shifts comments explaining why Stable MIR drops an optional variant
name field, for `Downcast` projection elements, to the `Place::stable`
function.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116244 (Apply structured suggestion that allows test to work since 1.64)
- #117686 (Build pre-coroutine-transform coroutine body on error)
- #117834 (target_feature: make it more clear what that 'Option' means)
- #117893 (Suggest dereferencing the LHS for binops such as `&T == T`)
- #117911 (Fix some typos)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
target_feature: make it more clear what that 'Option' means
Reading those tables in compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/target_features.rs, it's not immediately clear that `None` means "stable". Let's use an enum with appropriately named variants to make that more obvious.
Build pre-coroutine-transform coroutine body on error
I was accidentally building the post-transform coroutine body, rather than the pre-transform coroutine body. There's no pinning expected here yet, and the return type isn't yet transformed into `CoroutineState`.
Fixes#117670
make `LayoutError::Cycle` carry `ErrorGuaranteed`
Addresses a FIXME, and also I think it's wise for error variants to carry their `ErrorGuaranteed` -- makes it easier to use that `ErrorGuaranteed` for creating, e.g. `TyKind::Error` and other error kinds. Splitting out from #117703.
Add CoroutineWitness to covered types in smir
Previously we accepted `CouroutineWitness` as `unreachable!` but https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/issues/50 shows it is indeed reachable, this pr fixes that and covers `CouroutineWitness`
Custom MIR: Support cleanup blocks
Cleanup blocks are declared with `bb (cleanup) = { ... }`.
`Call` and `Drop` terminators take an additional argument describing the unwind action, which is one of the following:
* `UnwindContinue()`
* `UnwindUnreachable()`
* `UnwindTerminate(reason)`, where reason is `ReasonAbi` or `ReasonInCleanup`
* `UnwindCleanup(block)`
Also support unwind resume and unwind terminate terminators:
* `UnwindResume()`
* `UnwindTerminate(reason)`
Cleanup blocks are declared with `bb (cleanup) = { ... }`.
`Call` and `Drop` terminators take an additional argument describing the
unwind action, which is one of the following:
* `UnwindContinue()`
* `UnwindUnreachable()`
* `UnwindTerminate(reason)`, where reason is `ReasonAbi` or `ReasonInCleanup`
* `UnwindCleanup(block)`
Also support unwind resume and unwind terminate terminators:
* `UnwindResume()`
* `UnwindTerminate(reason)`
Always point at index span on index obligation failure
Use more targetted span for index obligation failures by rewriting the obligation cause span.
CC #66023
Remove incorrect transformation from RemoveZsts
Partial removal of storage statements for a local is incorrect, so a decision to optimize cannot be make independently for each statement.
Avoid the issue by performing the transformation completely or not at all.
Remove `-Zperf-stats`.
The included measurements have varied over the years. At one point there were quite a few more, but #49558 deleted a lot that were no longer used. Today there's just four, and it's a motley collection that doesn't seem particularly valuable.
I think it has been well and truly subsumed by self-profiling, which collects way more data.
r? `@wesleywiser`
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #114224 (rustc_llvm: Link to libkstat on Solaris/SPARC)
- #117695 (Reorder checks to make sure potential missing expect on Option/Result…)
- #117870 (`fn args_ref_X` to `fn args_X`)
- #117879 (tests: update check for inferred nneg on zext)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
tests: update check for inferred nneg on zext
This was broken by upstream
llvm/llvm-project@dc6d077396. It's easy enough to use a regex match to support both, so we do that.
r? `@nikic`
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
rustc_llvm: Link to libkstat on Solaris/SPARC
getHostCPUName calls into libkstat but as of
LLVM 16.0.6 libLLVMTargetParser is not explicitly
linked against libkstat causing builds to fail
due to undefined symbols.
See also: llvm/llvm-project#64186
Compute layout with spans for better cycle errors in coroutines
Split out from #117703, this PR at least gives us a nicer span to point at when we hit a cycle error in coroutine layout cycles.
Remove `-Zkeep-hygiene-data`.
It was added way back in #28585 under the name `-Zkeep-mtwt-tables`. The justification was:
> This is so that the resolution results can be used after analysis,
> potentially for tool support.
There are no uses of significance in the code base, and various Google searches for both option names (and variants) found nothing of interest. I think this can safely be removed.
r? `@davidtwco`
This was broken by upstream
llvm/llvm-project@dc6d077396. It's easy
enough to use a regex match to support both, so we do that.
r? @nikic
@rustbot label: +llvm-main
`ReLateBound` -> `ReBound`
first step of https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/95
already fairly large xx
there's some future work here I intentionally did not contribute as part of this PR, from my notes:
- `DescriptionCtx` to `DescriptionCtxt`
- what is `CheckRegions::Bound`?
- `collect_late_bound_regions` et al
- `erase_late_bound_regions` -> `instantiate_bound_regions_with_erased`?
- `EraseEarlyRegions` should be removed, feels duplicate
r? `@BoxyUwU`
