- Replace `ignore-windows` -> `only-unix` since the test exercises Unix
signals and `ExitStatus::code` behavior that's specific to Unix.
- Replace `ignore-*` with `needs-subprocess`.
- Change test to check only.
- Don't ignore `wasm` or `sgx`.
- Gate test to be Unix only because Unix `CommandExt` influences the
suggestion.
- Run rustfix on the suggestion.
tests: Port `jobserver-error` to rmake.rs
Part of #121876.
This PR ports `tests/run-make/jobserver-error` to rmake.rs, and is basically #128789 slightly adjusted.
The complexity involved here is mostly how to get `/dev/null/` piping to fd 3 working with std `Command`, whereas with a shell this is much easier (as is evident with the `Makefile` version).
Supersedes #128789.
This PR is co-authored with `@Oneirical` and `@coolreader18.`
try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: i686-gnu-1
try-job: x86_64-gnu-debug
try-job: x86_64-gnu-llvm-18-1
Add test for checking used glibc symbols
This test checks that we do not use too new glibc symbols in the compiler on x64 GNU Linux, in order not to break our [glibc promises](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2022/08/01/Increasing-glibc-kernel-requirements.html).
One thing that isn't solved in the PR yet is to make sure that this test will only run on `dist` CI, more specifically on the `dist-x86_64-linux` runner, in the opt-dist post-optimization tests (it can fail elsewhere, that doesn't matter). Any suggestions on how to do that are welcome.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134037
r? `@jieyouxu`
Misc. `rustc_resolve` cleanups
Hopefully this PR should make `rustc_resolve` a bit cleaner.
Each commit here stands on its own. I tried to only include changes that are easy to review, and are a clear improvement. (but I'll be happy to revert any changes that turn out to be more controversial than I'd thought)
Best viewed with whitespace ignored 😁 (especially [these two commits](a93616acf3..ae87d005bc?diff=unified&w=1))
Detect missing fields with default values and suggest `..`
When a struct ctor use has missing fields, if all those missing fields have defaults, suggest `..`:
```
error[E0063]: missing fields `field1` and `field2` in initializer of `S`
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-ctor.rs:16:13
|
LL | let _ = S { field: () };
| ^ missing `field1` and `field2`
|
help: all remaining fields have default values, you can use those values with `..`
|
LL | let _ = S { field: (), .. };
| ++++
```
Properly note when query stack is being cut off
cc #70953
also, i'm not certain whether we should even limit this at all. i don't see the problem with printing the full query stack, apparently it was limited b/c we used to ICE? but we're already printing the full stack to disk since #108714.
r? oli-obk
Point at invalid utf-8 span on user's source code
```
error: couldn't read `$DIR/not-utf8-bin-file.rs`: stream did not contain valid UTF-8
--> $DIR/not-utf8-2.rs:6:5
|
LL | include!("not-utf8-bin-file.rs");
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: byte `193` is not valid utf-8
--> $DIR/not-utf8-bin-file.rs:2:14
|
LL | let _ = "�|�␂!5�cc␕␂��";
| ^
= note: this error originates in the macro `include` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
```
When we attempt to load a Rust source code file, if there is a OS file failure we try reading the file as bytes. If that succeeds we try to turn it into UTF-8. If *that* fails, we provide additional context about *where* the file has the first invalid UTF-8 character.
Fix#76869.
Fix ICE-133117: multiple never-pattern arm doesn't have false_edge_start_block
Fixes#133117 , and close fixes#133063 , fixes#130779
In order to fix ICE-133117, at first I needed to tackle to ICE-133063 (this fixed 130779 as well).
### ICE-133063 and ICE-130779
This ICE is caused by those steps:
1. An arm has or-pattern, and all of the sub-candidates are never-pattern
2. In that case, all sub-candidates are removed in remove_never_subcandidates(). So the arm (candidate) has no sub-candidate.
3. In the current implementation, if there is no sub-candidate, the function assigns `pre_binding_block` into the candidate ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/matches/mod.rs#L2002-L2004)). However, otherwise_block should be assigned to the candidate as well, because the otherwise_block is unwrapped in multiple place (like in lower_match_tree()). As a result, it causes the panic.
I simply added the same block as pre_binding_block into otherwise_block, but I'm wondering if there is a better block to assign to otherwise_block (is it ok to assign the same block into pre_binding and otherwise?)
### ICE-133117
This is caused by those steps:
1. There are two arms, both are or-pattern and each has one match-pair (in the test code, both are `(!|!)`), and the second arm has a guard.
2. In match_candidate() for the first arm, it expands the second arm’s sub-candidates as well ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/matches/mod.rs#L1800-L1805)). As a result, the root candidate of the second arm is not evaluated/modified in match_candidate(). So a false_edge_start_block is not assigned to the candidate.
3. merge_trivial_subcandidates() is called against the candidate for the second arm. It just returns immediately because the candidate has a guard. So a flase_edge_start_block is not assigned to the candidate also in this function.
4. remove_never_subcandidates() is called against the candidate. Since all sub-candidates are never-pattern. they are removed.
5. In lower_match_tree(), since there is no sub-candidate for the candidate, the candidate itself is evaluated in visit_leave_rev ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/matches/mod.rs#L1532)). Because the candidate has no false_edge_start_block, it causes the panic.
So I modified the order of if blocks in merge_trivial_subcandidates() to assign a false_edge_start_block if the candidate doesn't have.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #133372 (Refactor dyn-compatibility error and suggestions)
- #134396 (AIX: use align 8 for byval parameter)
- #135156 (Make our `DIFlags` match `LLVMDIFlags` in the LLVM-C API)
- #135816 (Use `structurally_normalize` instead of manual `normalizes-to` goals in alias relate errors)
- #135823 (make UI tests that use `--test` work on panic=abort targets)
- #135850 (Update the `wasm-component-ld` tool)
- #135858 (rustdoc: Finalize dyn compatibility renaming)
- #135866 (Don't pick `T: FnPtr` nested goals as the leaf goal in diagnostics for new solver)
- #135874 (Enforce that all spans are lowered in ast lowering)
- #135875 (Remove `Copy` bound from `enter_forall`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Enforce that all spans are lowered in ast lowering
This should ensure that incremental is used as extensively as possible. It's only a debug assertion, and only enabled when incremental is enabled (as we only lower spans to relative spans then).
Don't pick `T: FnPtr` nested goals as the leaf goal in diagnostics for new solver
r? `@lcnr`
See `tests/ui/traits/next-solver/diagnostics/dont-pick-fnptr-bound-as-leaf.rs` for a minimized example of what code this affects the diagnostics off. The output of running nightly `-Znext-solver` on that test is the following:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `Foo: Trait` is not satisfied
--> src/lib.rs:14:20
|
14 | requires_trait(Foo);
| -------------- ^^^ the trait `FnPtr` is not implemented for `Foo`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
note: required for `Foo` to implement `Trait`
--> src/lib.rs:7:16
|
7 | impl<T: FnPtr> Trait for T {}
| ----- ^^^^^ ^
| |
| unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
note: required by a bound in `requires_trait`
--> src/lib.rs:11:22
|
11 | fn requires_trait<T: Trait>(_: T) {}
| ^^^^^ required by this bound in `requires_trait`
```
Part of rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#148
Update the `wasm-component-ld` tool
This commit updates the `wasm-component-ld` tool from 0.5.11 to 0.5.12. This pulls in a fix for the binary adapters that are included with this tool for an issue described in bytecodealliance/wasmtime#10058. Some other dependencies have additionally been updated in the meantime of `wasm-component-ld` but there should otherwise be no major changes.
Use `structurally_normalize` instead of manual `normalizes-to` goals in alias relate errors
r? `@lcnr`
I added `structurally_normalize_term` so that code that is generic over ty or const can use the structurally normalize helpers. See `tests/ui/traits/next-solver/diagnostics/alias_relate_error_uses_structurally_normalize.rs` for a description of the reason for the (now fixed) ICEs
Make our `DIFlags` match `LLVMDIFlags` in the LLVM-C API
In order to be able to use a mixture of LLVM-C and C++ bindings for debuginfo, our Rust-side `DIFlags` needs to have the same layout as LLVM-C's `LLVMDIFlags`, and we also need to be able to convert it to the `DIFlags` accepted by LLVM's C++ API.
Internally, LLVM converts between the two types with a simple cast. We can't necessarily rely on that always being true, and LLVM doesn't expose a conversion function, so we have two potential options:
- Convert each bit/subvalue individually
- Statically assert that doing a cast is actually fine
As long as both types do remain the same under the hood (which seems likely), the static-assert-and-cast approach is easier and faster. If the static assertions ever start failing against some future version of LLVM, we'll have to switch over to the convert-each-subvalue approach, which is a bit more error-prone.
---
Extracted from #134009, though this PR ended up choosing the static-assert-and-cast approach over the convert-each-subvalue approach.
AIX: use align 8 for byval parameter
On AIX, byval pointer arguments are aligned to 8 bytes based on the 64bit register size. For example, the C callee https://godbolt.org/z/5f4vnG6bh will expect the following argument.
```
ptr nocapture noundef readonly byval(%struct.TwoU64s) align 8 %0
```
This case is captured by `run-make/extern-fn-explicit-align`
Refactor dyn-compatibility error and suggestions
This CL makes a number of small changes to dyn compatibility errors:
- "object safety" has been renamed to "dyn-compatibility" throughout
- "Convert to enum" suggestions are no longer generated when there exists a type-generic impl of the trait or an impl for `dyn OtherTrait`
- Several error messages are reorganized for user readability
Additionally, the dyn compatibility error creation code has been split out into functions.
cc #132713
cc #133267
r? `@compiler-errors`
This CL makes a number of small changes to dyn compatibility errors:
- "object safety" has been renamed to "dyn-compatibility" throughout
- "Convert to enum" suggestions are no longer generated when there
exists a type-generic impl of the trait or an impl for `dyn OtherTrait`
- Several error messages are reorganized for user readability
Additionally, the dyn compatibility error creation code has been
split out into functions.
cc #132713
cc #133267
Properly record metavar spans for other expansions other than TT
This properly records metavar spans for nonterminals other than tokentree. This means that we operations like `span.to(other_span)` work correctly for macros. As you can see, other diagnostics involving metavars have improved as a result.
Fixes#132908
Alternative to #133270
cc `@ehuss`
cc `@petrochenkov`
Update our range `assume`s to the format that LLVM prefers
I found out in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123278#issuecomment-2597440158 that the way I started emitting the `assume`s in #109993 was suboptimal, and as seen in that LLVM issue the way we're doing it -- with two `assume`s sometimes -- can at times lead to CVP/SCCP not realize what's happening because one of them turns into a `ne` instead of conveying a range.
So this updates how it's emitted from
```
assume( x >= LOW );
assume( x <= HIGH );
```
or
```
// (for ranges that wrap the range)
assume( (x <= LOW) | (x >= HIGH) );
```
to
```
assume( (x - LOW) <= (HIGH - LOW) );
```
so that we don't need multiple `icmp`s nor multiple `assume`s for a single value, and both wrappping and non-wrapping ranges emit the same shape.
(And we don't bother emitting the subtraction if `LOW` is zero, since that's trivial for us to check too.)
