937a18daf9
Use `bool` in favor of `Option<()>` for diagnostics
We originally only supported `Option<()>` for optional notes/labels, but we now support `bool`. Let's use that, since it usually leads to more readable code.
I'm not removing the support from the derive macro, though I guess we could error on it... 🤔
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| check_consts | ||
| const_eval | ||
| interpret | ||
| util | ||
| errors.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||