3e968c7e9f
Do not treat lifetimes from parent items as influencing child items
```rust
struct A;
impl Bar<'static> for A {
const STATIC: &str = "";
// ^ no future incompat warning
}
```
has no future incompat warning, because there is no ambiguity. But
```rust
struct C;
impl Bar<'_> for C {
// ^^ this lifeimte
const STATIC: &'static str = {
struct B;
impl Bar<'static> for B {
const STATIC: &str = "";
// causes ^ to emit a future incompat warning
}
""
};
}
```
had one before this PR, because the impl for `B` (which is just a copy of `A`) thought it was influenced by a lifetime on the impl for `C`.
I double checked all other `lifetime_ribs` iterations and all of them do check for `Item` boundaries. This feels very fragile tho, and ~~I think we should do not even be able to see ribs from parent items, but that's a different refactoring that I'd rather not do at the same time as a bugfix~~. EDIT: ah nevermind, this is needed for improving diagnostics like "use of undeclared lifetime" being "can't use generic parameters from outer item" instead.
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| messages.ftl | ||