Dylan DPC d7a24003d8 Rollup merge of #95354 - dtolnay:rustc_const_stable, r=lcnr ... Handle rustc_const_stable attribute in library feature collector The library feature collector in [compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs](551b4fa395/compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs) has only been looking at `#[stable(…)]`, `#[unstable(…)]`, and `#[rustc_const_unstable(…)]` attributes, while ignoring `#[rustc_const_stable(…)]`. The consequences of this were: - When any const feature got stabilized (changing one or more `rustc_const_unstable` to `rustc_const_stable`), users who had previously enabled that unstable feature using `#![feature(…)]` would get told "unknown feature", rather than rustc's nicer "the feature … has been stable since … and no longer requires an attribute to enable". This can be seen in the way that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93957#issuecomment-1079794660 failed after rebase: ```console error[E0635]: unknown feature `const_ptr_offset` --> $DIR/offset_from_ub.rs:1:35 | LL | #![feature(const_ptr_offset_from, const_ptr_offset)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` - We weren't enforcing that a particular feature is either stable everywhere or unstable everywhere, and that a feature that has been stabilized has the same stabilization version everywhere, both of which we enforce for the other stability attributes. This PR updates the library feature collector to handle `rustc_const_stable`, and fixes places in the standard library and test suite where `rustc_const_stable` was being used in a way that does not meet the rules for a stability attribute.		2022-04-02 03:34:21 +02:00
..
src	Rollup merge of #95354 - dtolnay:rustc_const_stable, r=lcnr	2022-04-02 03:34:21 +02:00
Cargo.toml	Migrate to 2021	2021-09-20 22:21:42 -04:00