ed61c139c2
feed resolver_for_lowering instead of storing it in a field r? `@cjgillot` opening this as * a discussion for `no_hash` + `feedable` queries. I think we'll want those, but I don't quite understand why they are rejected beyond a double check of the stable hashes for situations where the query is fed but also read from incremental caches. * and a discussion on removing all untracked fields from TyCtxt and setting it up so that they are fed queries instead |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| diagnostics | ||
| symbols | ||
| hash_stable.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| lift.rs | ||
| newtype.rs | ||
| query.rs | ||
| serialize.rs | ||
| symbols.rs | ||
| type_foldable.rs | ||
| type_visitable.rs | ||