![]() Instead, we adopt the position that introducing an `unsafe` field
itself carries a safety invariant: that if you assign an invariant
to that field weaker than what the field's destructor requires,
you must ensure that field is in a droppable state in your
destructor.
See:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3458#discussion_r1971676100
-
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
src | ||
Cargo.toml | ||
messages.ftl | ||
README.md |
For high-level intro to how type checking works in rustc, see the type checking chapter of the rustc dev guide.