![]() Currently these have non-traditional APIs which take a buffer and report how much was filled in, but they're not necessarily ergonomic to use. Returning an iterator which *also* exposes an underlying slice shouldn't result in any performance loss as it's just a lazy version of the same implementation, and it's also much more ergonomic! cc #27784 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
Cargo.toml | ||
collection_impls.rs | ||
hex.rs | ||
json.rs | ||
lib.rs | ||
serialize.rs |