160 lines
6.4 KiB
Rust
160 lines
6.4 KiB
Rust
use rustc_middle::ty::layout::{LayoutCx, LayoutError, LayoutOf, TyAndLayout, ValidityRequirement};
|
|
use rustc_middle::ty::{ParamEnv, ParamEnvAnd, Ty, TyCtxt};
|
|
use rustc_target::abi::{Abi, FieldsShape, Scalar, Variants};
|
|
|
|
use crate::const_eval::{CheckAlignment, CompileTimeInterpreter};
|
|
use crate::interpret::{InterpCx, MemoryKind, OpTy};
|
|
|
|
/// Determines if this type permits "raw" initialization by just transmuting some memory into an
|
|
/// instance of `T`.
|
|
///
|
|
/// `init_kind` indicates if the memory is zero-initialized or left uninitialized. We assume
|
|
/// uninitialized memory is mitigated by filling it with 0x01, which reduces the chance of causing
|
|
/// LLVM UB.
|
|
///
|
|
/// By default we check whether that operation would cause *LLVM UB*, i.e., whether the LLVM IR we
|
|
/// generate has UB or not. This is a mitigation strategy, which is why we are okay with accepting
|
|
/// Rust UB as long as there is no risk of miscompilations. The `strict_init_checks` can be set to
|
|
/// do a full check against Rust UB instead (in which case we will also ignore the 0x01-filling and
|
|
/// to the full uninit check).
|
|
pub fn check_validity_requirement<'tcx>(
|
|
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
|
kind: ValidityRequirement,
|
|
param_env_and_ty: ParamEnvAnd<'tcx, Ty<'tcx>>,
|
|
) -> Result<bool, LayoutError<'tcx>> {
|
|
let layout = tcx.layout_of(param_env_and_ty)?;
|
|
|
|
// There is nothing strict or lax about inhabitedness.
|
|
if kind == ValidityRequirement::Inhabited {
|
|
return Ok(!layout.abi.is_uninhabited());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if kind == ValidityRequirement::Uninit || tcx.sess.opts.unstable_opts.strict_init_checks {
|
|
might_permit_raw_init_strict(layout, tcx, kind)
|
|
} else {
|
|
let layout_cx = LayoutCx { tcx, param_env: param_env_and_ty.param_env };
|
|
might_permit_raw_init_lax(layout, &layout_cx, kind)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Implements the 'strict' version of the `might_permit_raw_init` checks; see that function for
|
|
/// details.
|
|
fn might_permit_raw_init_strict<'tcx>(
|
|
ty: TyAndLayout<'tcx>,
|
|
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
|
kind: ValidityRequirement,
|
|
) -> Result<bool, LayoutError<'tcx>> {
|
|
let machine =
|
|
CompileTimeInterpreter::new(/*can_access_statics:*/ false, CheckAlignment::Error);
|
|
|
|
let mut cx = InterpCx::new(tcx, rustc_span::DUMMY_SP, ParamEnv::reveal_all(), machine);
|
|
|
|
let allocated = cx
|
|
.allocate(ty, MemoryKind::Machine(crate::const_eval::MemoryKind::Heap))
|
|
.expect("OOM: failed to allocate for uninit check");
|
|
|
|
if kind == ValidityRequirement::Zero {
|
|
cx.write_bytes_ptr(
|
|
allocated.ptr,
|
|
std::iter::repeat(0_u8).take(ty.layout.size().bytes_usize()),
|
|
)
|
|
.expect("failed to write bytes for zero valid check");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let ot: OpTy<'_, _> = allocated.into();
|
|
|
|
// Assume that if it failed, it's a validation failure.
|
|
// This does *not* actually check that references are dereferenceable, but since all types that
|
|
// require dereferenceability also require non-null, we don't actually get any false negatives
|
|
// due to this.
|
|
Ok(cx.validate_operand(&ot).is_ok())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Implements the 'lax' (default) version of the `might_permit_raw_init` checks; see that function for
|
|
/// details.
|
|
fn might_permit_raw_init_lax<'tcx>(
|
|
this: TyAndLayout<'tcx>,
|
|
cx: &LayoutCx<'tcx, TyCtxt<'tcx>>,
|
|
init_kind: ValidityRequirement,
|
|
) -> Result<bool, LayoutError<'tcx>> {
|
|
let scalar_allows_raw_init = move |s: Scalar| -> bool {
|
|
match init_kind {
|
|
ValidityRequirement::Inhabited => {
|
|
bug!("ValidityRequirement::Inhabited should have been handled above")
|
|
}
|
|
ValidityRequirement::Zero => {
|
|
// The range must contain 0.
|
|
s.valid_range(cx).contains(0)
|
|
}
|
|
ValidityRequirement::UninitMitigated0x01Fill => {
|
|
// The range must include an 0x01-filled buffer.
|
|
let mut val: u128 = 0x01;
|
|
for _ in 1..s.size(cx).bytes() {
|
|
// For sizes >1, repeat the 0x01.
|
|
val = (val << 8) | 0x01;
|
|
}
|
|
s.valid_range(cx).contains(val)
|
|
}
|
|
ValidityRequirement::Uninit => {
|
|
bug!("ValidityRequirement::Uninit should have been handled above")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Check the ABI.
|
|
let valid = match this.abi {
|
|
Abi::Uninhabited => false, // definitely UB
|
|
Abi::Scalar(s) => scalar_allows_raw_init(s),
|
|
Abi::ScalarPair(s1, s2) => scalar_allows_raw_init(s1) && scalar_allows_raw_init(s2),
|
|
Abi::Vector { element: s, count } => count == 0 || scalar_allows_raw_init(s),
|
|
Abi::Aggregate { .. } => true, // Fields are checked below.
|
|
};
|
|
if !valid {
|
|
// This is definitely not okay.
|
|
return Ok(false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Special magic check for references and boxes (i.e., special pointer types).
|
|
if let Some(pointee) = this.ty.builtin_deref(false) {
|
|
let pointee = cx.layout_of(pointee.ty)?;
|
|
// We need to ensure that the LLVM attributes `aligned` and `dereferenceable(size)` are satisfied.
|
|
if pointee.align.abi.bytes() > 1 {
|
|
// 0x01-filling is not aligned.
|
|
return Ok(false);
|
|
}
|
|
if pointee.size.bytes() > 0 {
|
|
// A 'fake' integer pointer is not sufficiently dereferenceable.
|
|
return Ok(false);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If we have not found an error yet, we need to recursively descend into fields.
|
|
match &this.fields {
|
|
FieldsShape::Primitive | FieldsShape::Union { .. } => {}
|
|
FieldsShape::Array { .. } => {
|
|
// Arrays never have scalar layout in LLVM, so if the array is not actually
|
|
// accessed, there is no LLVM UB -- therefore we can skip this.
|
|
}
|
|
FieldsShape::Arbitrary { offsets, .. } => {
|
|
for idx in 0..offsets.len() {
|
|
if !might_permit_raw_init_lax(this.field(cx, idx), cx, init_kind)? {
|
|
// We found a field that is unhappy with this kind of initialization.
|
|
return Ok(false);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
match &this.variants {
|
|
Variants::Single { .. } => {
|
|
// All fields of this single variant have already been checked above, there is nothing
|
|
// else to do.
|
|
}
|
|
Variants::Multiple { .. } => {
|
|
// We cannot tell LLVM anything about the details of this multi-variant layout, so
|
|
// invalid values "hidden" inside the variant cannot cause LLVM trouble.
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Ok(true)
|
|
}
|