
``` error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: type `X` is non-empty --> file.rs:9:11 | 1 | / enum X { 2 | | A, | | - variant not covered 3 | | B, | | - variant not covered 4 | | C, | | - variant not covered 5 | | } | |_- `X` defined here ... 9 | match x { | ^ | = help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered --> file.rs:11:11 | 1 | / enum X { 2 | | A, 3 | | B, 4 | | C, | | - not covered 5 | | } | |_- `X` defined here ... 11 | match x { | ^ patterns `C` not covered ``` When a match expression doesn't have patterns covering every variant, point at the enum's definition span. On a best effort basis, point at the variant(s) that are missing. This does not handle the case when the missing pattern is due to a field's enum variants: ``` enum E1 { A, B, C, } enum E2 { A(E1), B, } fn foo() { match E2::A(E1::A) { E2::A(E1::B) => {} E2::B => {} } //~^ ERROR `E2::A(E1::A)` and `E2::A(E1::C)` not handled } ``` Unify look between match with no arms and match with some missing patterns. Fix #37518.
16 lines
478 B
Text
16 lines
478 B
Text
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `T(_, _)` not covered
|
|
--> $DIR/empty-never-array.rs:10:9
|
|
|
|
|
LL | / enum Helper<T, U> {
|
|
LL | | T(T, [!; 0]),
|
|
LL | | #[allow(dead_code)]
|
|
LL | | U(U),
|
|
LL | | }
|
|
| |_- `Helper<T, U>` defined here
|
|
...
|
|
LL | let Helper::U(u) = Helper::T(t, []);
|
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `T(_, _)` not covered
|
|
|
|
error: aborting due to previous error
|
|
|
|
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0005`.
|