These are working well for *unsigned* types, for the the signed ones there are a bunch of questions about what the semantics and API should be. And for the main "helpers for big integer implementations" use, there's no need for the signed versions anyway.
And there are plenty of other methods which exist for unsigned types but not signed ones, like `next_power_of_two`, so this isn't unusual.
Fixes 90541
These tests just verify some basic APIs of core::simd function, and
guarantees that attempting to access the wrong things doesn't work.
The majority of tests are stochastic, and so remain upstream, but
a few deterministic tests arrive in the subtree as doc tests.
This enables programmers to use a safe alternative to the current
`extern "platform-intrinsics"` API for writing portable SIMD code.
This is `#![feature(portable_simd)]` as tracked in #86656
This makes a few changes to the weak symbol macros in `sys::unix`:
- `dlsym!` is added to keep the functionality for runtime `dlsym`
lookups, like for `__pthread_get_minstack@GLIBC_PRIVATE` that we don't
want to show up in ELF symbol tables.
- `weak!` now uses `#[linkage = "extern_weak"]` symbols, so its runtime
behavior is just a simple null check. This is also used by `syscall!`.
- On non-ELF targets (macos/ios) where that linkage is not known to
behave, `weak!` is just an alias to `dlsym!` for the old behavior.
- `raw_syscall!` is added to always call `libc::syscall` on linux and
android, for cases like `clone3` that have no known libc wrapper.
The new `weak!` linkage does mean that you'll get versioned symbols if
you build with a newer glibc, like `WEAK DEFAULT UND statx@GLIBC_2.28`.
This might seem problematic, but old non-weak symbols can tie the build
to new versions too, like `dlsym@GLIBC_2.34` from their recent library
unification. If you build with an old glibc like `dist-x86_64-linux`
does, you'll still get unversioned `WEAK DEFAULT UND statx`, which may
be resolved based on the runtime glibc.
I also found a few functions that don't need to be weak anymore:
- Android can directly use `ftruncate64`, `pread64`, and `pwrite64`, as
these were added in API 12, and our baseline is API 14.
- Linux can directly use `splice`, added way back in glibc 2.5 and
similarly old musl. Android only added it in API 21 though.
This feature is aimed at giving proc macros access to powers similar to
those used by builtin macros such as `format_args!` or `concat!`. These
macros are able to accept macros in place of string literal parameters,
such as the format string, as they perform recursive macro expansion
while being expanded.
This can be especially useful in many cases thanks to helper macros like
`concat!`, `stringify!` and `include_str!` which are often used to
construct string literals at compile-time in user code.
For now, this method only allows expanding macros which produce
literals, although more expresisons will be supported before the method
is stabilized.
Document `unreachable!` custom panic message
The `unreachable!` docs previously did not mention that there was a second form, `unreachable!("message")` that could be used to specify a custom panic message,
The docs now mention this feature in the same wording as currently used for `unimplemented!`:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/macro.unimplemented.html#panics
Add more comments to explain the code to generate the search index
Fixes#90766.
I tried to put comments when the code wasn't easy to understand at first sight and added more documentation on the recursive function. Please tell me if I misused the terminology or if comments can be improved or added into other places.
r? `@notriddle`
Shorten Span of unused macro lints
The span has been reduced to the actual ident of the macro, instead of linting the
*whole* macro.
Closes#90745
r? ``@estebank``
Rename WASI's `FileTypeExt::is_character_device` to
`FileTypeExt::is_char_device`, for consistency with the Unix
`FileTypeExt::is_char_device`.
Also, add a `FileTypeExt::is_socket` function, for consistency with the
Unix `FileTypeExt::is_socket` function.
For small types with padding, the current implementation is UB because it does integer operations on uninit values. But LLVM has gotten smarter since I wrote the previous implementation in 2017, so remove all the manual magic and just write it in such a way that LLVM will vectorize. This code is much simpler (albeit nuanced) and has very little `unsafe`, and is actually faster to boot!
Optimize pattern matching
These commits speed up the `match-stress-enum` benchmark, which is very artificial, but the changes are simple enough that it's probably worth doing.
r? `@Nadrieril`
As discussed here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88300#issuecomment-936097710
I felt this was the best place to put this (rather than next to
ExitStatusExt). After all, it's a property of the ExitStatus type on
Unix.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
As discussed here
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88300#issuecomment-936085371
exit is (conventionally) a library function, with _exit being the
actual system call.
I have checked the other references and they say "if the process
terminated by calling `exti`". I think despite the slight
imprecision (strictly, it should read iff ... `_exit`), this is
clearer. Anyone who knows about the distinction between `exit` and
`_exit` will not be confused.
`_exit` is the correct traditional name for the system call, despite
Linux calling it `exit_group` or `exit`:
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=_exit&sektion=2&n=1
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
The `unreachable!` docs previously did not mention that there was a second
form, `unreachable!("message")` that could be used to specify a custom panic
message,
The docs now mention this in the same style as currently used for `unimplemented!`:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/macro.unimplemented.html#panics
Fix assertion failures in `OwnedHandle` with `windows_subsystem`.
As discussed in #88576, raw handle values in Windows can be null, such
as in `windows_subsystem` mode, or when consoles are detached from a
process. So, don't use `NonNull` to hold them, don't assert that they're
not null, and remove `OwnedHandle`'s `repr(transparent)`. Introduce a
new `HandleOrNull` type, similar to `HandleOrInvalid`, to cover the FFI
use case.
r? `@joshtriplett`
