Formatter::with_options takes self as a mutable reference (`&'a mut
Formatter<'b>`). `'a` and `'b` need to be different lifetimes. Just taking `&'a
mut Formatter<'a>` and trusting in Rust being able to implicitely convert from
`&'a mut Formatter<'b>` if necessary (after all, `'a` must be smaller than `'b`
anyway) fails because `'b` is behind a *mutable* reference. For background on
on this behavior, see https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/subtyping.html#variance.
The idea behind this is to make implementing `fmt::FormattingOptions` (as well
as any future changes to `std::Formatter`) easier.
In theory, this might have a negative performance impact because of the
additional function calls. However, I strongly believe that those will be
inlined anyway, thereby producing assembly code that has comparable performance.
Fix missing newlines that rustfmt removed.
fix trailing whitespace
Fix duplicate word.
Reformat panic reasons into a list
remove trailing whitespace 2 electric boogaloo
Change verbe tense.
Integrate suggestions
This reverts commit 65c5c7f8cf.
It unfortunately regresses the size of the target dir by a non-trivial
amount. It could be re-enabled again once each subsection doesn't get a
unique name anymore.
skip `setup::Hook` on non-git sources
Running `setup::Hook` (with `x setup`) leads tarball sources to panic and this PR resolves that problem by skipping `Hook` step on non-git sources.
Improve bootstrap job objects
This attempts to fix a few comments on bootstrap job objects.
I also fixed an issue where if duplicating the job object handle into the python process failed, it would close the job object. This would then result in the job object closing all attached processes, which at that point includes the current process. The fix is to simply never close the job object handle at any point after the current process is assigned to it.
Improve comments for the default backtrace printer
The existing comments were misleading, confusing, and outdated.
Take this comment for example:
```
// Any frames between `__rust_begin_short_backtrace` and `__rust_end_short_backtrace`
// are omitted from the backtrace in short mode, `__rust_end_short_backtrace` will be
// called before the panic hook, so we won't ignore any frames if there is no
// invoke of `__rust_begin_short_backtrace`.
```
this is just wrong. here is an example (full) backtrace:
<details>
```
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.01s
Running `/home/jyn/.local/lib/cargo/target/debug/example`
called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value
stack backtrace:
0: 0x56499698c595 - std::backtrace_rs::backtrace::libunwind::trace::h5ef2cc16e9a7415a
1: 0x56499698c595 - std::backtrace_rs::backtrace::trace_unsynchronized::h9b5e016e9075f714
2: 0x56499698c595 - std::sys_common::backtrace::_print_fmt::h2f62c7f9ff224e93
3: 0x56499698c595 - <std::sys_common::backtrace::_print::DisplayBacktrace as core::fmt::Display>::fmt::hbe51682735731910
4: 0x5649969aa26b - core::fmt::rt::Argument::fmt::h1994ab2b310d665e
5: 0x5649969aa26b - core::fmt::write::hade58a36d63468d7
6: 0x56499698a43f - std::io::Write::write_fmt::h16145587d801a9ab
7: 0x56499698c36e - std::sys_common::backtrace::_print::ha8082e56201dadb4
8: 0x56499698c36e - std::sys_common::backtrace::print::he30f96b4e7f6cbfd
9: 0x56499698d709 - std::panicking::default_hook::{{closure}}::hf0801f6b18a968d3
10: 0x56499698d4ac - std::panicking::default_hook::hd2defec7eda5aeb0
11: 0x56499698dc31 - std::panicking::rust_panic_with_hook::hde93283600065c53
12: 0x56499698daf3 - std::panicking::begin_panic_handler::{{closure}}::h5e151adbdb7ec0c1
13: 0x56499698ca59 - std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_end_short_backtrace::he36a1407e0f77700
14: 0x56499698d7d4 - rust_begin_unwind
15: 0x5649969a9503 - core::panicking::panic_fmt::h2380d41365f95412
16: 0x5649969a958c - core::panicking::panic::h38cf8db80e8c6e67
17: 0x5649969a93e9 - core::option::unwrap_failed::he72696e53ff29a05
18: 0x5649969722b6 - core::option::Option<T>::unwrap::hb574dc0dc1703062
19: 0x5649969722b6 - example::main::h7a867aafacd93d75
20: 0x5649969721db - core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once::h734f99a5e57291b7
21: 0x56499697226e - std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::h02f5d58c351c4756
22: 0x564996972241 - std::rt::lang_start::{{closure}}::h8b134fe2c31a4355
23: 0x564996988662 - core::ops::function::impls::<impl core::ops::function::FnOnce<A> for &F>::call_once::h88d7bb571ee2aaf4
24: 0x564996988662 - std::panicking::try::do_call::hfb78dfb6599c871d
25: 0x564996988662 - std::panicking::try::habd041c8c4c8e50c
27: 0x564996988662 - std::rt::lang_start_internal::{{closure}}::h227591a6f9c0879e
28: 0x564996988662 - std::panicking::try::do_call::h3c5878333c38916a
29: 0x564996988662 - std::panicking::try::h5af7b3a127cdae70
31: 0x564996988662 - std::rt::lang_start_internal::hbc85e809eeace0dd
32: 0x56499697221a - std::rt::lang_start::ha1eb16922c9cb224
33: 0x5649969722ee - main
34: 0x7f031962a1ca - __libc_start_call_main
35: 0x7f031962a28b - __libc_start_main_impl
36: 0x5649969720a5 - _start
37: 0x0 - <unknown>
```
</details>
note particularly frames 13-21, from start_backtrace to end_backtrace. with PrintFmt::Short, these are the *only* frames that are printed; i.e. we are doing the exact opposite of the comment.
r? ``@saethlin``
Fix "std" support status of some tier 3 targets
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127265 marked targets with empty "std" support status as no-std targets in target-spec metadata:
> * Where a targets 'std' or 'host tools' support is listed as '?' in the rust docs, these are left as 'None' with this PR. The corresponding changes in cargo will only reject an attempt to build std if the 'std' field is 'Some(false)'. In the case it is 'None', cargo will continue trying to build
However, this is not accurate because "std" support status has a marker indicating that it is a no-std target. (empty status is just invalid.)
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/platform-support.html#tier-3
> The `std` column in the table below has the following meanings:
>
> * ✓ indicates the full standard library is available.
> * \* indicates the target only supports [`no_std`] development.
> * ? indicates the standard library support is unknown or a work-in-progress.
>
> [`no_std`]: https://rust-embedded.github.io/book/intro/no-std.html
This PR fixes the status of targets whose "std" support status is currently set to empty and update target-spec metadata.
The new status is set based on the following criteria:
- Set to ✓ for targets that I regularly check in [rust-cross-toolchain](https://github.com/taiki-e/rust-cross-toolchain) that the `cargo test` works. (riscv32-unknown-linux-gnu,{riscv64,s390x}-unknown-linux-musl)
- Targets where `cargo run` works but `cargo test` does not work tend to have incomplete std support (e.g., riscv32 musl f3068b66e0), so I included them in the group below that means “work in progress” rather than in this group.
- Set powerpc64le FreeBSD to ✓ on both std and host_tools, because the [Rust package](https://www.freshports.org/lang/rust/) is available.
- Set to ? (which means "unknown" or “work in progress”) for all other affected targets because these are Linux, Android, FreeBSD, or Fuchsia, all of which are operating systems that support std if properly supported.
r? Noratrieb
cc ``@harmou01``
clarify simd_relaxed_fma non-determinism
This is the safer spec in the sense that it is more likely to be satisfied by the backend -- and if people are okay with a non-deterministic result, I assume they don't care whether it's the same choice across all lanes or not?
Cc ``@calebzulawski`` ``@workingjubilee``
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #118833 (Add lint against function pointer comparisons)
- #122161 (Fix suggestion when shorthand `self` has erroneous type)
- #133233 (Add context to "const in pattern" errors)
- #133761 (Update books)
- #133843 (Do not emit empty suggestion)
- #133863 (Rename `core_pattern_type` and `core_pattern_types` lib feature gates to `pattern_type_macro`)
- #133872 (No need to create placeholders for GAT args in confirm_object_candidate)
- #133874 (`fn_sig_for_fn_abi` should return a `ty::FnSig`, no need for a binder)
- #133890 (Add a new test ui/incoherent-inherent-impls/no-other-unrelated-errors to check E0116 does not cause unrelated errors)
- #133892 (Revert #133817)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Revert #133817
This reverts commit 0585134e70, reversing changes made to 5530869e0f.
#133817 unfortunately only converted the `println!` instances to `eprintln!`, meaning that some test output (via compiletest/bootstrap) was messed up because stdout/stderr output interleaved improperly when some `println!` instances were converted to `eprintln!` instances, while some `print!` instances remain unchanged. This made reading test output annoying for contributors cc #133879.
Closes#133879 by reverting.
#133817 can be relanded in the future when `print!` instances are also matched with `println!` instances.
cc `@clubby789`
This is a clean revert so I'm going to self-approve this PR.
Add a new test ui/incoherent-inherent-impls/no-other-unrelated-errors to check E0116 does not cause unrelated errors
rustc xxx (we do not know) to 1.82.0 emits unrelated errors when E0116 is present (see #125814).
We do not know what caused and fixed it, but add a test to confirm rustc does not cause the same error in the future.
No need to create placeholders for GAT args in confirm_object_candidate
We no longer need this logic to add placeholders for GAT args since with the removal of the `gat_extended` feature gate (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133768) we no longer allow GATs in dyn trait anyways.
r? oli-obk
Rename `core_pattern_type` and `core_pattern_types` lib feature gates to `pattern_type_macro`
That's what the gates are actually gating, and the single char difference in naming was not helpful either
fixes#128987
