This way syntax extensions can generate unsafe blocks without worrying about
them generating unnecessary unsafe warnings. Perhaps a special keyword could be
added to be used in macros, but I don't think that's the best solution.
has a unique id. Fixes numerous bugs in macro expansion and deriving. Add two
representative tests.
Fixes#7971Fixes#6304Fixes#8367Fixes#8754Fixes#8852Fixes#2543Fixes#7654
Also redefine all of the standard logging macros to use more rust code instead
of custom LLVM translation code. This makes them a bit easier to understand, but
also more flexibile for future types of logging.
Additionally, this commit removes the LogType language item in preparation for
changing how logging is performed.
Also redefine all of the standard logging macros to use more rust code instead
of custom LLVM translation code. This makes them a bit easier to understand, but
also more flexibile for future types of logging.
Additionally, this commit removes the LogType language item in preparation for
changing how logging is performed.
This removes the stacking of type parameters that occurs when invoking
trait methods, and fixes all places in the standard library that were
relying on it. It is somewhat awkward in places; I think we'll probably
want something like the `Foo::<for T>::new()` syntax.
When parsing a trait function, the function must end with either `;` or
`{` (signifying a default implementation). The error message incorrectly
stated that it must be `;` or `}`.
Fixes#6610.
When parsing a trait function, the function must end with either `;` or
`{` (signifying a default implementation). The error message incorrectly
stated that it must be `;` or `}`.
Fixes#6610.
Fix#3192. r? anyone
There are 4 different new tests, to check some different scenarios for
what the parse context is at the time of recovery, becasue our
compile-fail infrastructure does not appear to handle verifying
error-recovery situations.
Differentiate between unit-like struct definition item and unit-like
struct construction in the error message.
----
More generally, outlines a more generic strategy for parse error
recovery: By committing to an expression/statement at set points in
the parser, we can then do some look-ahead to catch common mistakes
and skip over them.
One detail about this strategy is that you want to avoid emitting the
"helpful" message unless the input is reasonably close to the case of
interest. (E.g. do not warn about a potential unit struct for an
input of the form `let hmm = do foo { } { };`)
To accomplish this, I added (partial) last_token tracking; used for
`commit_stmt` support.
The check_for_erroneous_unit_struct_expecting fn returns bool to
signal whether it "made progress"; currently unused; this is meant for
use to compose several such recovery checks together in a loop.
`enum Token` was 192 bytes (64-bit), as pointed out by pnkfelix; the only
bloating variant being `INTERPOLATED(nonterminal)`.
Updating `enum nonterminal` to use ~ where variants included big types,
shrunk size_of(Token) to 32 bytes (64-bit).
I am unsure if the `nt_ident` variant should have an indirection, with
ast::ident being only 16 bytes (64-bit), but without this, enum Token
would be 40 bytes.
A dumb benchmark says that compilation time is unchanged, while peak
memory usage for compiling std.rs is down 3%
Before::
$ time ./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc --cfg stage1 src/libstd/std.rs
19.00user 0.39system 0:19.41elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 627820maxresident)k
0inputs+28896outputs (0major+228665minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ time ./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc -O --cfg stage1 src/libstd/std.rs
31.64user 0.34system 0:32.02elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 629876maxresident)k
0inputs+22432outputs (0major+229411minor)pagefaults 0swaps
After::
$ time ./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc --cfg stage1 src/libstd/std.rs
19.07user 0.45system 0:19.55elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 609384maxresident)k
0inputs+28896outputs (0major+221997minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ time ./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage1/bin/rustc -O --cfg stage1 src/libstd/std.rs
31.90user 0.34system 0:32.28elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 612080maxresident)k
0inputs+22432outputs (0major+223726minor)pagefaults 0swaps
r? @graydon Also, notably, make rustpkgtest depend on the rustpkg executable (otherwise, tests that shell out to rustpgk might run when rustpkg doesn't exist).
This commit allows you to write:
extern mod x = "a/b/c";
which means rustc will search in the RUST_PATH for a package with
ID a/b/c, and bind it to the name `x` if it's found.
Incidentally, move get_relative_to from back::rpath into std::path
There are 4 different new tests, to check some different scenarios for
what the parse context is at the time of recovery, becasue our
compile-fail infrastructure does not appear to handle verifying
error-recovery situations.
Differentiate between unit-like struct definition item and unit-like
struct construction in the error message.
----
More generally, outlines a more generic strategy for parse error
recovery: By committing to an expression/statement at set points in
the parser, we can then do some look-ahead to catch common mistakes
and skip over them.
One detail about this strategy is that you want to avoid emitting the
"helpful" message unless the input is reasonably close to the case of
interest. (E.g. do not warn about a potential unit struct for an
input of the form `let hmm = do foo { } { };`)
To accomplish this, I added (partial) last_token tracking; used for
`commit_stmt` support.
The check_for_erroneous_unit_struct_expecting fn returns bool to
signal whether it "made progress"; currently unused; this is meant for
use to compose several such recovery checks together in a loop.
- Made naming schemes consistent between Option, Result and Either
- Changed Options Add implementation to work like the maybe monad (return None if any of the inputs is None)
- Removed duplicate Option::get and renamed all related functions to use the term `unwrap` instead
