```
error: `size_of_val` is not yet stable as a const intrinsic
--> $DIR/const-unstable-intrinsic.rs:17:9
|
LL | unstable_intrinsic::size_of_val(&x);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: add `#![feature(unstable)]` to the crate attributes to enable
help: add `#![feature(unstable)]` to the crate attributes to enable
|
LL + #![feature("unstable")]
|
```
When encountering a call corresponding to an item marked as unstable behind a feature flag, provide a structured suggestion pointing at where in the crate the `#![feature(..)]` needs to be written.
```
error: `foobar` is not yet stable as a const fn
--> $DIR/const-stability-attribute-implies-no-feature.rs:12:5
|
LL | foobar();
| ^^^^^^^^
|
help: add `#![feature(const_foobar)]` to the crate attributes to enable
|
LL + #![feature(const_foobar)]
|
```
Fix#81370.
Expand docs for `E0207` with additional example
Add an example to E0207 docs showing how to tie the lifetime of the self type to an associated type in an impl when the trait *doesn't* have a lifetime to begin with.
CC #135589.
Detect if-else chains with a missing final else in type errors
```
error[E0308]: `if` and `else` have incompatible types
--> $DIR/if-else-chain-missing-else.rs:12:12
|
LL | let x = if let Ok(x) = res {
| ______________-
LL | | x
| | - expected because of this
LL | | } else if let Err(e) = res {
| | ____________^
LL | || return Err(e);
LL | || };
| || ^
| ||_____|
| |_____`if` and `else` have incompatible types
| expected `i32`, found `()`
|
= note: `if` expressions without `else` evaluate to `()`
= note: consider adding an `else` block that evaluates to the expected type
```
We probably want a longer explanation and fewer spans on this case.
Partially address #133316.
Location-sensitive polonius prototype: endgame
This PR sets up the naive location-sensitive analysis end-to-end, and replaces the location-insensitive analysis. It's roughly all the in-progress work I wanted to land for the prototype, modulo cleanups I still want to do after the holidays, or the polonius debugger, and so on.
Here, we traverse the localized constraint graph, have to deal with kills and time-traveling (👌), and record that as loan liveness for the existing scope and active loans computations.
Then the near future looks like this, especially if the 2025h1 project goal is accepted:
- gradually bringing it up to completion
- analyzing and fixing the few remaining test failures
- going over the *numerous* fixmes in this prototype (one of which is similar to a hang on one test's millions and millions of constraints)
- trying to see how to lower the impact of the lack of NLL liveness optimization on diagnostics, and their categorization of local variables and temporaries (the vast majority of blessed expectations differences), as well as the couple ICEs trying to find an NLL constraint to blame for errors.
- dealing with the theoretical weakness around kills, conflating reachability for the two TCS, etc that is described ad nauseam in the code.
- switching the compare mode to the in-tree implementation, and blessing the diagnostics
- apart from the hang, it's not catastrophically slower on our test suite, so then we can try to enable it on CI
- checking crater, maybe trying to make it faster :3, etc.
I've tried to gradually introduce this PR's work over 4 commits, because it's kind of subtle/annoying, and Niko/I are not completely convinced yet. That one comment explaining the situation is maybe 30% of the PR 😓. Who knew that spacetime reachability and time-traveling could be mind bending.
I kinda found this late and the impact on this part of the computation was a bit unexpected to us. A bit more care/thought will be needed here. I've described my plan in the comments though. In any case, I believe we have the current implementation is a conservative approximation that shouldn't result in unsoundness but false positives at worst. So it feels fine for now.
r? ``@jackh726``
---
Fixes#127628 -- which was a assertion triggered for a difference in loan computation between NLLs and the location-insensitive analysis. That doesn't exist anymore so I've removed this crash test.
Add gpu-kernel calling convention
The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit f6b21e90d1 (#120495 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/16463) due to inactivity in the amdgpu target.
Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to `ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust compiles for.
Tracking issue: #135467
amdgpu target tracking issue: #135024
Use trait definition cycle detection for trait alias definitions, too
fixes#133901
In general doing this for `All` is not right, but this code path is specifically for traits and trait aliases, and there we only ever use `All` for trait aliases.
Update docs for `-Clink-dead-code` to discourage its use
The `-Clink-dead-code` flag was originally added way back in #31368, apparently to help improve the output of some older forms of code coverage measurement, and also to address some use-cases for wanting to suppress linker flags like `-dead_strip` and `--gc-section`.
In the past it might have also been useful in conjunction with `-Cinstrument-coverage`, but subsequent improvements to coverage instrumentation have made it unnecessary there.
[It is also currently used by cargo-fuzz by default](https://github.com/rust-fuzz/cargo-fuzz/issues/391), for reasons that are possibly no longer relevant.
---
The flag currently does more than its name suggests, affecting not just linker flags, but also monomorphization decisions. It has also contributed to ICEs (e.g. #135515) that would not have occurred without link-dead-code.
---
For now, this PR just updates the documentation to be more realistic about what the flag does, and when it should be used (approximately never). In the future, it might be worth looking into properly deprecating this flag, and perhaps making it a no-op if feasible.
coverage: Completely overhaul counter assignment, using node-flow graphs
The existing code for choosing where to put physical counter-increments gets the job done, but is very ad-hoc and hard to modify without introducing tricky regressions.
This PR replaces all of that with a more principled approach, based on the algorithm described in "Optimal measurement points for program frequency counts" (Knuth & Stevenson, 1973).
---
We start by ensuring that our graph has “balanced flow”, i.e. each node's flow (execution count) is equal to the sum of all its in-edge flows, and equal to the sum of all its out-edge flows. That isn't naturally true of control-flow graphs, so we introduce a wrapper type `BalancedFlowGraph` to fix that by introducing synthetic nodes and edges as needed.
Once our graph has balanced flow, the next step is to create another view of that graph in which each node's successors have all been merged into one “supernode”. Consequently, each node's out-edges can be coalesced into a single out-edge to one of those supernodes. Because of the balanced-flow property, the flow of that coalesced edge is equal to the flow of the original node.
Having expressed all of our node flows as edge flows, we can then analyze node flows using techniques for analyzing edge flows. We incrementally build a spanning tree over the merged supernodes, such that each new edge in the spanning tree represents a node whose flow can be computed from that of other nodes.
When this is done, we end up with a list of “counter terms” for each node, describing which nodes need physical counters, and how the remaining nodes can have their flow calculated by adding and subtracting those physical counters.
---
The re-blessed coverage tests show that this results in modest or major improvements for our test programs. Some tests need fewer physical counters, some tests need fewer expression nodes for the same number of physical counters, and some tests show striking reductions in both.
Fix overflows in the implementation of `overflowing_literals` lint's help
This PR fixes two overflow problems that cause the `overflowing_literals` lint to behave incorrectly in some edge cases.
1. When an integer literal is between `i128::MAX` and `u128::MAX`, an overflowing `as` cast can cause the suggested type to be overly small. It's fixed by using checked type conversion and returning `u128` when it's the only choice. (Fixes#135248)
2. When an integer literal is `i128::MIN` but is of a smaller type, an overflowing negation cause the compiler to panic in debug build. Fixed by checking the number size beforehand and `wrapping_neg`. (Fixes#131849)
Edit: extracted the type conversion part into a standalone function to separate the concern of overflowing.
[cfg_match] Adjust syntax
A year has passed since the creation of #115585 and the feature, as expected, is not moving forward. Let's change that.
This PR proposes changing the arm's syntax from `cfg(SOME_CONDITION) => { ... }` to `SOME_CODITION => {}`.
```rust
match_cfg! {
unix => {
fn foo() { /* unix specific functionality */ }
}
target_pointer_width = "32" => {
fn foo() { /* non-unix, 32-bit functionality */ }
}
_ => {
fn foo() { /* fallback implementation */ }
}
}
```
Why? Because after several manual migrations in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116342 it became clear, at least for me, that `cfg` prefixes are unnecessary, verbose and redundant.
Again, everything is just a proposal to move things forward. If the shown syntax isn't ideal, feel free to close this PR or suggest other alternatives.
```
error[E0308]: `if` and `else` have incompatible types
--> $DIR/if-else-chain-missing-else.rs:12:12
|
LL | let x = if let Ok(x) = res {
| ______________-
LL | | x
| | - expected because of this
LL | | } else if let Err(e) = res {
| | ____________^
LL | || return Err(e);
LL | || };
| || ^
| ||_____|
| |_____`if` and `else` have incompatible types
| expected `i32`, found `()`
|
= note: `if` expressions without `else` evaluate to `()`
= note: consider adding an `else` block that evaluates to the expected type
```
We probably want a longer explanation and fewer spans on this case.
Partially address #133316.
The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit
f6b21e90d1 due to inactivity in the amdgpu
target.
Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to
`ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust
compiles for.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135497 (fix typo in typenames of pin documentation)
- #135522 (add incremental test for issue 135514)
- #135523 (const traits: remove some known-bug that do not seem to make sense)
- #135535 (Add GUI test for #135499)
- #135541 (Methods of const traits are const)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Prefer lower `TraitUpcasting` candidates in selection
Fixes#135463. The underlying cause is this ambiguity, but it's more clear (and manifests as a coercion error, rather than a MIR validation error) when it's written the way I did in the UI test.
Sorry this is cursed r? lcnr
deprecate `std::intrinsics::transmute` etc, use `std::mem::*` instead
The `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` attribute lets users call `std::mem::transmute` as `std::intrinsics::transmute`. The former is a reexport of the latter, and for a long time we didn't properly check stability for reexports, so making this a hard error now would be a breaking change for little gain. But at the same time, `std::intrinsics::transmute` is not the intended path for this function, so I think it is a good idea to show a deprecation warning when that path is used. This PR implements that, for all the functions in `std::intrinsics` that carry the attribute.
I assume this will need ``@rust-lang/libs-api`` FCP.
Treat safe target_feature functions as unsafe by default [less invasive variant]
This unblocks
* #134090
As I stated in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134090#issuecomment-2541332415 I think the previous impl was too easy to get wrong, as by default it treated safe target feature functions as safe and had to add additional checks for when they weren't. Now the logic is inverted. By default they are unsafe and you have to explicitly handle safe target feature functions.
This is the less (imo) invasive variant of #134317, as it doesn't require changing the Safety enum, so it only affects FnDefs and nothing else, as it should.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132397 (Make missing_abi lint warn-by-default.)
- #133807 (ci: Enable opt-dist for dist-aarch64-linux builds)
- #134143 (Convert `struct FromBytesWithNulError` into enum)
- #134338 (Use a C-safe return type for `__rust_[ui]128_*` overflowing intrinsics)
- #134678 (Update `ReadDir::next` in `std::sys::pal::unix::fs` to use `&raw const (*p).field` instead of `p.byte_offset().cast()`)
- #135424 (Detect unstable lint docs that dont enable their feature)
- #135520 (Make sure we actually use the right trivial lifetime substs when eagerly monomorphizing drop for ADTs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make sure we actually use the right trivial lifetime substs when eagerly monomorphizing drop for ADTs
Absolutely clueless mistake of mine. Whoops.
When eagerly collecting mono items, when we encounter an ADT, we try to monomorphize its drop glue. In #135313, I made it so that this acts more like eagerly monomorphizing functions, where we allow (in this case) ADTs with lifetimes, since those can be erased by codegen.
However, I did not account for the call to `instantiate_and_check_impossible_predicates`, which was still passing an empty set of args. This means that if the ADT in question had any predicates, we'd get an index out of bounds panic.
This PR creates the correct set of args for the ADT.
Fixes#135515. I assume that this manifests in that issue because of `-Clink-dead-code` or something.
Use a C-safe return type for `__rust_[ui]128_*` overflowing intrinsics
Combined with [1], this will change the overflowing multiplication operations to return an `extern "C"`-safe type.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/735 [1]
Do not consider traits that have unsatisfied const conditions to be conditionally const
This will improve error messages as we continue to constify traits, since we don't want to start calling things "conditionally const" if they aren't implemented with a const impl anyways.
The only case that this affects today is `Deref` since that's one of the only constified traits in the standard library :)
r? RalfJung
Enforce syntactical stability of const traits in HIR
This PR enforces what I'm calling *syntactical* const stability of traits. In other words, it enforces the ability to name `~const`/`const` traits in trait bounds in various syntax positions in HIR (including in the trait of an impl header). This functionality is analogous to the *regular* item stability checker, which is concerned with making sure that you cannot refer to unstable items by name, and is implemented as an extension of that pass.
This is separate from enforcing the *recursive* const stability of const trait methods, which is implemented in MIR and runs on MIR bodies. That will require adding a new `NonConstOp` to the const checker and probably adjusting some logic to deduplicate redundant errors.
However, this check is separate and necessary for making sure that users don't add `~const`/`const` bounds to items when the trait is not const-stable in the first place. I chose to separate enforcing recursive const stability out of this PR to make it easier to review. I'll probably open a follow-up following this one, blocked on this PR.
r? `@RalfJung` cc `@rust-lang/project-const-traits`
Make sure we can produce `ConstArgHasWrongType` errors for valtree consts
I forgot about `ty::ConstKind::Value` in #134771.
The error message here could use some work -- both in the new trait solver and the old trait solver. But unrelated to the issue here.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135361 -- this was only ICEing in coherence because coherence uses the new trait solver, but I don't think the minimization is worth committing compared to the test I added.
r? ```@lcnr``` or ```@BoxyUwU```
