Remove `SelectionContext::infcx()` in favor of field access
Encapsulation doesn't seem particularly important here, and having two choices is always more confusing than having one.
r? types
Add `ConstKind::Expr`
Starting to implement `ty::ConstKind::Abstract`, most of the match cases are stubbed out, some I was unsure what to add, others I didn't want to add until a more complete implementation was ready.
r? `@lcnr`
Initial pass at expr/abstract const/s
Address comments
Switch to using a list instead of &[ty::Const], rm `AbstractConst`
Remove try_unify_abstract_consts
Update comments
Add edits
Recurse more
More edits
Prevent equating associated consts
Move failing test to ui
Changes this test from incremental to ui, and mark it as failing and a known bug.
Does not cause the compiler to ICE, so should be ok.
Previously, async constructs would be lowered to "normal" generators,
with an additional `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim in between to
convert from `Generator` to `Future`.
The compiler will now special-case these generators internally so that
async constructs will *directly* implement `Future` without the need
to go through the `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim.
The primary motivation for this change was hiding this implementation
detail in stack traces and debuginfo, but it can in theory also help
the optimizer as there is less abstractions to see through.
Make "long type" printing type aware and trim types in E0275
Instead of simple string cutting, use a custom printer to hide parts of long printed types.
On E0275, check for type length before printing.
Convert predicates into Predicate in the Obligation constructor
instead of having almost all callers do that.
This reduces a bit of boilerplate, and also paves the way for my work towards https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/531 (as it makes it easier to accept both goals and clauses where right now it only accepts predicates).
Remove allow(rustc::potential_query_instability) in rustc_trait_selection
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84447
This PR needs to be benchmarked to check for regressions.
Better error for HRTB error from generator interior
cc #100013
This is just a first pass at an error. It could be better, and shouldn't really be emitted in the first place. But this is better than what was being emitted before.
Make InferCtxtExt use a FxIndexMap
This should be faster, because the map is only being used to iterate,
which is supposed to be faster with the IndexMap
Make the user_computed_preds use an IndexMap
It is being used mostly for iteration, so the change shouldn't result in
a perf hit
Make the RegionDeps fields use an IndexMap
This change could be a perf hit. Both `larger` and `smaller` are used
for iteration, but they are also used for insertions.
Make types_without_default_bounds use an IndexMap
It uses extend, but it also iterates and removes items. Not sure if
this will be a perf hit.
Make InferTtxt.reported_trait_errors use an IndexMap
This change brought a lot of other changes. The map seems to have been
mostly used for iteration, so the performance shouldn't suffer.
Add FIXME to change ProvisionalEvaluationCache.map to use an IndexMap
Right now this results in a perf hit. IndexMap doesn't have
the `drain_filter` API, so in `on_completion` we now need to iterate two
times over the map.
Remove `DefId` from some `SelectionCandidate` variants
They are both from `obligation.predicate.def_id()`, which do not need to be on the `SelectionCandidate`.
cc ````@lcnr```` ````@compiler-errors````
remove outdated coherence hack
we have a more precise detection for downstream conflicts in candidate assembly: the `is_knowable` check in `candidate_from_obligation_no_cache`.
r? types cc `@nikomatsakis`
Make cycle errors recoverable
In particular, this allows rustdoc to recover from cycle errors when normalizing associated types for documentation.
In the past, ```@jackh726``` has said we need to be careful about overflow errors: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91430#issuecomment-983997013
> Off the top of my head, we definitely should be careful about treating overflow errors the same as
"not implemented for some reason" errors. Otherwise, you could end up with behavior that is
different depending on recursion depth. But, that might be context-dependent.
But cycle errors should be safe to unconditionally report; they don't depend on the recursion depth, they will always be an error whenever they're encountered.
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81091.
r? ```@lcnr``` cc ```@matthewjasper```
