Implement intrinsics with fallback bodies
fixes#93145 (though we can port many more intrinsics)
cc #63585
The way this works is that the backend logic for generating custom code for intrinsics has been made fallible. The only failure path is "this intrinsic is unknown". The `Instance` (that was `InstanceDef::Intrinsic`) then gets converted to `InstanceDef::Item`, which represents the fallback body. A regular function call to that body is then codegenned. This is currently implemented for
* codegen_ssa (so llvm and gcc)
* codegen_cranelift
other backends will need to adjust, but they can just keep doing what they were doing if they prefer (though adding new intrinsics to the compiler will then require them to implement them, instead of getting the fallback body).
cc `@scottmcm` `@WaffleLapkin`
### todo
* [ ] miri support
* [x] default intrinsic name to name of function instead of requiring it to be specified in attribute
* [x] make sure that the bodies are always available (must be collected for metadata)
Store static initializers in metadata instead of the MIR of statics.
This means that adding generic statics would be even more difficult, as we can't evaluate statics from other crates anymore, but the subtle issue I have encountered make me think that having this be an explicit problem is better.
The issue is that
```rust
static mut FOO: &mut u32 = &mut 42;
static mut BAR = unsafe { FOO };
```
gets different allocations, instead of referring to the same one. This is also true for non-static mut, but promotion makes `static FOO: &u32 = &42;` annoying to demo.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61345
## Why is this being done?
In order to ensure all crates see the same nested allocations (which is the last issue that needs fixing before we can stabilize [`const_mut_refs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57349)), I am working on creating anonymous (from the Rust side, to LLVM it's like a regular static item) static items for the nested allocations in a static. If we evaluate the static item in a downstream crate again, we will end up duplicating its nested allocations (and in some cases, like the `match` case, even duplicate the main allocation).
Use fewer delayed bugs.
For some cases where it's clear that an error has already occurred, e.g.:
- there's a comment stating exactly that, or
- things like HIR lowering, where we are lowering an error kind
The commit also tweaks some comments around delayed bug sites.
r? `@oli-obk`
For some cases where it's clear that an error has already occurred,
e.g.:
- there's a comment stating exactly that, or
- things like HIR lowering, where we are lowering an error kind
The commit also tweaks some comments around delayed bug sites.
If we only check for duplicate spans when `prev` is unmodified, we reduce the
number of situations that `update_pending_dups` needs to handle.
This could potentially change the coverage spans we produce in some unknown
corner cases, but none of our current coverage tests indicate any change.
Dejargonize `subst`
In favor of #110793, replace almost every occurence of `subst` and `substitution` from rustc codes, but they still remains in subtrees under `src/tools/` like clippy and test codes (I'd like to replace them after this)
Fix async closures in CTFE
First commit renames `is_coroutine_or_closure` into `is_closure_like`, because `is_coroutine_or_closure_or_coroutine_closure` seems confusing and long.
Second commit fixes some forgotten cases where we want to handle `TyKind::CoroutineClosure` the same as closures and coroutines.
The test exercises the change to `ValidityVisitor::aggregate_field_path_elem` which is the source of #120946, but not the change to `UsedParamsNeedSubstVisitor`, though I feel like it's not that big of a deal. Let me know if you'd like for me to look into constructing a test for the latter, though I have no idea what it'd look like (we can't assert against `TooGeneric` anywhere?).
Fixes#120946
r? oli-obk cc ``@RalfJung``
Check that the ABI of the instance we are inlining is correct
When computing the `CallSite` in the mir inliner, double check that the instance of the function that we are inlining is compatible with the signature from the trait definition that we acquire from the MIR.
Fixes#120940
r? ``@oli-obk`` or ``@cjgillot``
Remove a bunch of dead parameters in functions
Found this kind of issue when working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119650
I wrote a trivial toy lint and manual review to find these.
Assert that params with the same *index* have the same *name*
Found this bug when trying to build libcore with the new solver, since it will canonicalize two params with the same index into *different* placeholders if those params differ by name.
Fold pointer operations in GVN
This PR proposes 2 combinations of cast operations in MIR GVN:
- a chain of `PtrToPtr` or `MutToConstPointer` casts can be folded together into a single `PtrToPtr` cast;
- we attempt to evaluate more ptr ops when there is no provenance.
In particular, this allows to read from static slices.
This is not yet sufficient to see through slice operations that use `PtrComponents` (because that's a union), but still a step forward.
r? `@ghost`
These crates all needed specialization for `newtype_index!`, which will no
longer be necessary when the current nightly eventually becomes the next
bootstrap compiler.
Fix more `ty::Error` ICEs in MIR passes
Fixes#120791 - Add a check for `ty::Error` in the `ByMove` coroutine pass
Fixes#120816 - Add a check for `ty::Error` in the MIR validator
Also a drive-by fix for a FIXME I had asked oli to add
r? oli-obk
Invert diagnostic lints.
That is, change `diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and `untranslatable_diagnostic` from `allow` to `deny`, because more than half of the compiler has been converted to use translated diagnostics.
This commit removes more `deny` attributes than it adds `allow` attributes, which proves that this change is warranted.
r? ````@davidtwco````
Toggle assert_unsafe_precondition in codegen instead of expansion
The goal of this PR is to make some of the unsafe precondition checks in the standard library available in debug builds. Some UI tests are included to verify that it does that.
The diff is large, but most of it is blessing mir-opt tests and I've also split up this PR so it can be reviewed commit-by-commit.
This PR:
1. Adds a new intrinsic, `debug_assertions` which is lowered to a new MIR NullOp, and only to a constant after monomorphization
2. Rewrites `assume_unsafe_precondition` to check the new intrinsic, and be monomorphic.
3. Skips codegen of the `assume` intrinsic in unoptimized builds, because that was silly before but with these checks it's *very* silly
4. The checks with the most overhead are `ptr::read`/`ptr::write` and `NonNull::new_unchecked`. I've simply added `#[cfg(debug_assertions)]` to the checks for `ptr::read`/`ptr::write` because I was unable to come up with any (good) ideas for decreasing their impact. But for `NonNull::new_unchecked` I found that the majority of callers can use a different function, often a safe one.
Yes, this PR slows down the compile time of some programs. But in our benchmark suite it's never more than 1% icount, and the average icount change in debug-full programs is 0.22%. I think that is acceptable for such an improvement in developer experience.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120539#issuecomment-1922687101
Fix mir pass ICE in the presence of other errors
fixes#120779
it is impossible to add a ui test for this, because it only reproduces in build-fail, but a test that also has errors in check-fail mode can't be made build-fail 🙃
I would have to add a run-make test or sth, which is overkill for such a tiny thing imo.
Remove unused args from functions
`#[instrument]` suppresses the unused arguments from a function, *and* suppresses unused methods too! This PR removes things which are only used via `#[instrument]` calls, and fixes some other errors (privacy?) that I will comment inline.
It's possible that some of these arguments were being passed in for the purposes of being instrumented, but I am unconvinced by most of them.
