Suggest returning local on "expected `ty`, found `()`" due to expr-less block
Putting this up for _initial_ review. Notably, this doesn't consider if the value has possibly been moved, or whether the type is `Copy`. It also provides a structured suggestion if there's one "preferred" binding that matches the type (i.e. one binding in the block or its parent), otherwise it just points them out if there's fewer than 4 of them.
Fixes#98177
r? `@estebank`
Improve the function pointer docs
This is #97842 but for function pointers instead of tuples. The concept is basically the same.
* Reduce duplicate impls; show `fn (T₁, T₂, …, Tₙ)` and include a sentence saying that there exists up to twelve of them.
* Show `Copy` and `Clone`.
* Show auto traits like `Send` and `Sync`, and blanket impls like `Any`.
https://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-test/std/primitive.fn.html
* Reduce duplicate impls; show only the `fn (T)` and include a sentence
saying that there exists up to twelve of them.
* Show `Copy` and `Clone`.
* Show auto traits like `Send` and `Sync`, and blanket impls like `Any`.
- Use `expr.hir_id.owner` instead of `self.tcx.parent_module(expr.hir_id)`
- Use `.type_at()` instead of `.first()` + `.expect_ty()`
- Use single `.find()` with `&&` condition
Co-authored-by: Michael Goulet <michael@errs.io>
Use `typeck_results` to get accurate qpath res for arg mismatch error
Improves error message from "function" to actually what we're calling (e.g. enum variant constrcutor) in a few cases 😸
Do not constraint TAITs when checking impl/trait item compatibility
Check out the UI test for the example.
Open to other approaches to fix this issue -- ideally we _would_ be able to collect this opaque type constraint in a way to use it in `find_opaque_ty_constraints`, so we can report a better mismatch error in the incompatible case, and just allow it in the compatible case. But that seems like a bigger refactor, so I wouldn't want to start it unless someone else thought it was a good idea.
cc #99348
r? ``@oli-obk``
Be more precise when suggesting removal of parens on unit ctor
* Fixes#99240 by only suggesting to remove parens on path exprs, not arbitrary expressions with enum type
* Generalizes by suggesting removal of parens on unit struct, too, because why not?
Remove some usages of `guess_head_span`
No need to pass things through `guess_head_span` if they already point to the head span.
Only major change is that we point to the head span of `enum`s on some errors now, which I prefer.
r? `@cjgillot`
Implement `for<>` lifetime binder for closures
This PR implements RFC 3216 ([TI](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97362)) and allows code like the following:
```rust
let _f = for<'a, 'b> |a: &'a A, b: &'b B| -> &'b C { b.c(a) };
// ^^^^^^^^^^^--- new!
```
cc ``@Aaron1011`` ``@cjgillot``
Fix drop-tracking ICE when a struct containing a field with a significant drop is used across an await
Previously, drop-tracking would incorrectly assume the struct would be dropped immediately, which was not true.
Fixes#98476. Also fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98477, I think because the parent HIR node for type variables is the whole function instead of the expression where the variable is used.
r? `@eholk`
