Preserve substs in opaques recorded in typeck results
This means that we now prepopulate MIR with opaques with the right substs.
The first commit is a hack that I think we discussed, having to do with `DefiningAnchor::Bubble` basically being equivalent to `DefiningAnchor::Error` in the new solver, so having to use `DefiningAnchor::Bind` instead, lol.
r? `@lcnr`
Replace const eval limit by a lint and add an exponential backoff warning
The lint triggers at the first power of 2 that comes after 1 million function calls or traversed back-edges (takes less than a second on usual programs). After the first emission, an unsilenceable warning is repeated at every following power of 2 terminators, causing it to get reported less and less the longer the evaluation runs.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
fixes#93481closes#67217
Only rewrite valtree-constants to patterns and keep other constants opaque
Now that we can reliably fall back to comparing constants with `PartialEq::eq` to the match scrutinee, we can
1. eagerly try to convert constants to valtrees
2. then deeply convert the valtree to a pattern
3. if the to-valtree conversion failed, create an "opaque constant" pattern.
This PR specifically avoids any behavioral changes or major cleanups. What we can now do as follow ups is
* move the two remaining call sites to `destructure_mir_constant` off that query
* make valtree to pattern conversion infallible
* this needs to be done after careful analysis of the effects. There may be user visible changes from that.
based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111768
move `super_relate_consts` hack to `normalize_param_env_or_error`
`super_relate_consts` has as hack in it to work around the fact that `normalize_param_env_or_error` is broken. When relating two constants we attempt to evaluate them (aka normalize them). This is not an issue in any way specific to const generics, type aliases also have the same issue as demonstrated in [this code](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=84b6d3956a2c852a04b60782476b56c9).
Since the hack in `super_relate_consts` only exists to make `normalize_param_env_or_error` emit less errors move it to `normalize_param_env_or_error`. This makes `super_relate_consts` act more like the normal plain structural equality its supposed to and should help ensure that the hack doesnt accidentally affect other situations.
r? `@compiler-errors`
change `BorrowKind::Unique` to be a mutating `PlaceContext`
fixes#112056
I believe that `BorrowKind::Unique` is a footgun in general, so I added a FIXME and opened https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112072. This is a bit too involved for this PR though.
refactor and cleanup the leak check, add it to new solver
ended up being a bit more involved than I wanted but is hopefully still easy enough to review as a single PR, can split it into separate ones otherwise.
this can be reviewed commit by commit:
a473d55cdb9284aa2b01282d1b529a2a4d26547b 31a686646534ca006d906ec757ece4e771d6f973 949039c107852a5e36361c08b62821a0613656f5 242917bf5170d9a723c6c8e23e9d9d0c2fa8dc9d ed2b25a7aa28be3184be9e3022c2796a30eaad87 are all pretty straightforward.
03dd83b4c3f4ff27558f5c8ab859bd9f83db1d04 makes it easier to refactor coherence in a later commit, see the commit description, cc `@oli-obk`
4fe311d807a77b6270f384e41689bf5d58f46aec I don't quite remember what we wanted to test here, this definitely doesn't test that the occurs check doesn't cause incorrect errors in coherence, also cc `@oli-obk` here. I may end up writing a new test for this myself later.
5c200d88a91b75bd0875b973150655bd581ef97a is the main refactor of the leak check, changing it to take the `outer_universe` instead of getting it from a snapshot. Using a snapshot requires us to be in a probe which we aren't in the new solver, it also just feels dirty as snapshots don't really have anything to do with universes.
with all of this cfc230d54188d9c7ed867a9a0d1f51be77b485f9 is now kind of trivial.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
`EarlyBinder::new` -> `EarlyBinder::bind`
for consistency with `Binder::bind`. it may make sense to also add `EarlyBinder::dummy` in places where we know that no parameters exist, but I left that out of this PR.
r? `@jackh726` `@kylematsuda`
Make `TyKind: Debug` have less verbose output
Current `TyKind: Debug` impl is basically unusable for debugging, its too verbose even for verbose debugging 🤣 This PR replaces the debug logic for `TyKind` with a more manual debug impl instead of a hand expanded derived impl. This should help make #107084 more reasonable to land since the output of `Ty: Debug` will be better.
This isn't a fully completed change to the `Debug` impl of `TyKind` as there's still logic from the derive macro for some variants. Some of the variants are also not consisten with the `-Zverbose` printing of `Ty`, ideally `-Zverbose` printing of `Ty` would also just defer to the debug impl instead of having lots of checks in pretty printing. I plan on fixing this in follow up PRs since it seems tricky to do in this one and its already a large PR 😅
Use `Cow` in `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage`.
Each of `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}` has a comment:
```
// FIXME(davidtwco): can a `Cow<'static, str>` be used here?
```
This commit answers that question in the affirmative. It's not the most compelling change ever, but it might be worth merging.
This requires changing the `impl<'a> From<&'a str>` impls to `impl From<&'static str>`, which involves a bunch of knock-on changes that require/result in call sites being a little more precise about exactly what kind of string they use to create errors, and not just `&str`. This will result in fewer unnecessary allocations, though this will not have any notable perf effects given that these are error paths.
Note that I was lazy within Clippy, using `to_string` in a few places to preserve the existing string imprecision. I could have used `impl Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` in various places as is done in the compiler, but that would have required changes to *many* call sites (mostly changing `&format("...")` to `format!("...")`) which didn't seem worthwhile.
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
Each of `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}` has a comment:
```
// FIXME(davidtwco): can a `Cow<'static, str>` be used here?
```
This commit answers that question in the affirmative. It's not the most
compelling change ever, but it might be worth merging.
This requires changing the `impl<'a> From<&'a str>` impls to `impl
From<&'static str>`, which involves a bunch of knock-on changes that
require/result in call sites being a little more precise about exactly
what kind of string they use to create errors, and not just `&str`. This
will result in fewer unnecessary allocations, though this will not have
any notable perf effects given that these are error paths.
Note that I was lazy within Clippy, using `to_string` in a few places to
preserve the existing string imprecision. I could have used `impl
Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` in various places as is done in the
compiler, but that would have required changes to *many* call sites
(mostly changing `&format("...")` to `format!("...")`) which didn't seem
worthwhile.
MIR: opt-in normalization of `BasicBlock` and `Local` numbering
This doesn't matter at all for actual codegen, but after spending some time reading pre-codegen MIR, I was wishing I didn't have to jump around so much in reading post-inlining code.
So this add two passes that are off by default for every mir level, but can be enabled (`-Zmir-enable-passes=+ReorderBasicBlocks,+ReorderLocals`) for humans.
Add warn-by-default lint when local binding shadows exported glob re-export item
This PR introduces a warn-by-default rustc lint for when a local binding (a use statement, or a type declaration) produces a name which shadows an exported glob re-export item, causing the name from the exported glob re-export to be hidden (see #111336).
### Unresolved Questions
- [x] ~~Is this approach correct? While it passes the UI tests, I'm not entirely convinced it is correct.~~ Seems to be ok now.
- [x] ~~What should the lint be called / how should it be worded? I don't like calling `use x::*;` or `struct Foo;` a "local binding" but they are `NameBinding`s internally if I'm not mistaken.~~ ~~The lint is called `local_binding_shadows_glob_reexport` for now, unless a better name is suggested.~~ `hidden_glob_reexports`.
Fixes#111336.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111384 (Fix linking Mac Catalyst by including LC_BUILD_VERSION in object files)
- #111899 (CGU cleanups)
- #111940 (Clarify safety concern of `io::Read::read` is only relevant in unsafe code)
- #111947 (Add test for RPIT defined with different hidden types with different substs)
- #111951 (Correct comment on privately uninhabited pattern.)
Failed merges:
- #111954 (improve error message for calling a method on a raw pointer with an unknown pointee)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Ensure Fluent messages are in alphabetical order
Fixes#111847
This adds a tidy check to ensure Fluent messages are in alphabetical order, as well as sorting all existing messages. I think the error could be worded better, would appreciate suggestions.
<details>
<summary>Script used to sort files</summary>
```py
import sys
import re
fn = sys.argv[1]
with open(fn, 'r') as f:
data = f.read().split("\n")
chunks = []
cur = ""
for line in data:
if re.match(r"^([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\s*=\s*", line):
chunks.append(cur)
cur = ""
cur += line + "\n"
chunks.append(cur)
chunks.sort()
with open(fn, 'w') as f:
f.write(''.join(chunks).strip("\n\n") + "\n")
```
</details>
Handle opaques in the new solver (take 2?)
Implement a new strategy for handling opaques in the new solver.
First, queries now carry both their defining anchor and the opaques that were defined in the inference context at the time of canonicalization. These are both used to pre-populate the inference context used by the canonical query.
Second, use the normalizes-to goal to handle opaque types in the new solver. This means that opaques are handled like projection aliases, but with their own rules:
* Can only define opaques if they're "defining uses" (i.e. have unique params in all their substs).
* Can only define opaques that are from the anchor.
* Opaque type definitions are modulo regions. So that means `Opaque<'?0r> = HiddenTy1` and `Opaque<?'1r> = HiddenTy2` equate `HiddenTy1` and `HiddenTy2` instead of defining them as different opaque type keys.
