Less minification
The goal of this PR is to remove the minification process on the `search-index.js` file. It provides great result in term of space reduction but the computation time is far too long. I'll work on this issue and will put it back once it's fast enough.
cc @nox @lqd
r? @kinnison
rustdoc: Don't panic when failing to write .lock file
It can be treated like any other unexpected IO error.
I couldn't think of a good way to add a test for this unfortunately.
r? @GuillaumeGomez
Update Source Code Pro and include italics
Fixes#65502.
A few notes:
* As stated in #65502, this does increase the download size.
* Since this PR changes the font set, I think docs.rs would have to be updated if this PR is merged.
* The fonts have a double extension (.ttf.woff); this is to keep the names consistent with the upstream font release which does that to distinguish these from the .otf.woff files ([Source Code Pro otf renders poorly on older Windows system apps](https://github.com/adobe-fonts/source-code-pro/issues/25#issuecomment-9019600)).
Instead just use `pprust::path_to_string(..)` where needed.
This has two benefits:
a) The AST definition is now independent of printing it.
(Therefore we get closer to extracting a data-crate.)
b) Debugging should be easier as program flow is clearer.
There's not really any reason to not have the visibility default to
inherited, and this saves us the trouble of checking everywhere for
whether we have a visibility or not.
This means that callers can pass in a closure like
`|buf| some_function(..., &mut buf)` and pass in arbitrary arguments to
that function without complicating the trait definition. We also keep
the impl for str and String, since it's useful to be able to just pass
in "" or format!("{}"...) results in some cases.
This changes Print's definition to take self, instead of &self, because
otherwise FnOnce cannot be called directly. We could instead take FnMut
or even Fn, but that seems like it'd merely complicate matters -- most
of the time, the FnOnce does not constrain us at all anyway. If it does,
a custom Print impl for &'_ SomeStruct is not all that painful.
