miri ABI compatibility check: accept u32 and i32
If only the sign differs, then surely these types are compatible. (We do still check that `arg_ext` is the same, just in case.)
Also I made it so that the ABI check must *imply* that size and alignment are the same, but it doesn't actively check that itself. With how crazy ABI constraints get, having equal size and align really shouldn't be used as a signal for anything I think...
miri will report an UB when calling a function that has a `#[target_feature(enable = ...)]` attribute is called and the required feature is not available.
"Available features" are the same that `is_x86_feature_detected!` (or equivalent) reports to be available during miri execution (which can be enabled or disabled with the `-C target-feature` flag).
Unify terminology used in unwind action and terminator, and reflect
the fact that a nounwind panic is triggered instead of an immediate
abort is triggered for this terminator.
(This is a large commit. The changes to
`compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/context.rs` are the most important ones.)
The current naming scheme is a mess, with a mix of `_intern_`, `intern_`
and `mk_` prefixes, with little consistency. In particular, in many
cases it's easy to use an iterator interner when a (preferable) slice
interner is available.
The guiding principles of the new naming system:
- No `_intern_` prefixes.
- The `intern_` prefix is for internal operations.
- The `mk_` prefix is for external operations.
- For cases where there is a slice interner and an iterator interner,
the former is `mk_foo` and the latter is `mk_foo_from_iter`.
Also, `slice_interners!` and `direct_interners!` can now be `pub` or
non-`pub`, which helps enforce the internal/external operations
division.
It's not perfect, but I think it's a clear improvement.
The following lists show everything that was renamed.
slice_interners
- const_list
- mk_const_list -> mk_const_list_from_iter
- intern_const_list -> mk_const_list
- substs
- mk_substs -> mk_substs_from_iter
- intern_substs -> mk_substs
- check_substs -> check_and_mk_substs (this is a weird one)
- canonical_var_infos
- intern_canonical_var_infos -> mk_canonical_var_infos
- poly_existential_predicates
- mk_poly_existential_predicates -> mk_poly_existential_predicates_from_iter
- intern_poly_existential_predicates -> mk_poly_existential_predicates
- _intern_poly_existential_predicates -> intern_poly_existential_predicates
- predicates
- mk_predicates -> mk_predicates_from_iter
- intern_predicates -> mk_predicates
- _intern_predicates -> intern_predicates
- projs
- intern_projs -> mk_projs
- place_elems
- mk_place_elems -> mk_place_elems_from_iter
- intern_place_elems -> mk_place_elems
- bound_variable_kinds
- mk_bound_variable_kinds -> mk_bound_variable_kinds_from_iter
- intern_bound_variable_kinds -> mk_bound_variable_kinds
direct_interners
- region
- intern_region (unchanged)
- const
- mk_const_internal -> intern_const
- const_allocation
- intern_const_alloc -> mk_const_alloc
- layout
- intern_layout -> mk_layout
- adt_def
- intern_adt_def -> mk_adt_def_from_data (unusual case, hard to avoid)
- alloc_adt_def(!) -> mk_adt_def
- external_constraints
- intern_external_constraints -> mk_external_constraints
Other
- type_list
- mk_type_list -> mk_type_list_from_iter
- intern_type_list -> mk_type_list
- tup
- mk_tup -> mk_tup_from_iter
- intern_tup -> mk_tup
Miri: basic dyn* support
As usual I am very unsure about the dynamic dispatch stuff, but it passes even the `Pin<&mut dyn* Trait>` test so that is something.
TBH I think it was a mistake to make `dyn Trait` and `dyn* Trait` part of the same `TyKind` variant. Almost everywhere in Miri this lead to the wrong default behavior, resulting in strange ICEs instead of nice "unimplemented" messages. The two types describe pretty different runtime data layout after all.
Strangely I did not need to do the equivalent of [this diff](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106532#discussion_r1087095963) in Miri. Maybe that is because the unsizing logic matches on `ty::Dynamic(.., ty::Dyn)` already? In `unsized_info` I don't think the `target_dyn_kind` can be `DynStar`, since then it wouldn't be unsized!
r? `@oli-obk` Cc `@eholk` (dyn-star) https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102425
