Of primary interest, this merges
rust-lang/rls@ece09b88c0 into rust-lang/rust,
which brings in the changes that fix RLS tests broken by #97853. #97853 already
introduced that commit's changes (under
27f4044df03d15c7c38a483c3e4635cf4f51807d) but without putting those changes on
rust-lang/rls as a branch, so we ended up with an orphan commit that caused
trouble when updating submodules in rust-lang/rust.
This commit, once merged into rust-lang/rust, should continue to let RLS tests
to pass on rust-lang/rust's side and move us back into a healthy state where tip
of the submodule points to a valid master commit in the rust-lang/rls
repository.
Suggest defining variable as mutable on `&mut _` type mismatch in pats
Suggest writing `mut a` where `&mut a` was written but a non-ref type provided.
Since we still don't have "apply either one of the suggestions but not both" kind of thing, the interaction with the suggestion of removing `&[mut]` or moving it to the type is weird, and idk how to make it better..
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Reverse folder hierarchy
#91318 introduced a trait for infallible folders distinct from the fallible version. For some reason (completely unfathomable to me now that I look at it with fresh eyes), the infallible trait was a supertrait of the fallible one: that is, all fallible folders were required to also be infallible. Moreover the `Error` associated type was defined on the infallible trait! It's so absurd that it has me questioning whether I was entirely sane.
This trait reverses the hierarchy, so that the fallible trait is a supertrait of the infallible one: all infallible folders are required to also be fallible (which is a trivial blanket implementation). This of course makes much more sense! It also enables the `Error` associated type to sit on the fallible trait, where it sensibly belongs.
There is one downside however: folders expose a `tcx` accessor method. Since the blanket fallible implementation for infallible folders only has access to a generic `F: TypeFolder`, we need that trait to expose such an accessor to which we can delegate. Alternatively it's possible to extract that accessor into a separate `HasTcx` trait (or similar) that would then be a supertrait of both the fallible and infallible folder traits: this would ensure that there's only one unambiguous `tcx` method, at the cost of a little additional boilerplate. If desired, I can submit that as a separate PR.
r? ````@jackh726````
Set relocation_model to Pic on emscripten target
So we can support dynamically linking libraries with Emscripten (otherwise we need to use nightly and `-Zbuild-std` to rebuild std with relocations).
`````@sbc100`````
Mitigate MMIO stale data vulnerability
Intel publicly disclosed the MMIO stale data vulnerability on June 14. To mitigate this vulnerability, compiler changes are required for the `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` target.
cc: ````@jethrogb````
Windows: Iterative `remove_dir_all`
This will allow better strategies for use of memory and File handles. However, fully taking advantage of that is left to future work.
Note to reviewer: It's probably best to view the `remove_dir_all_recursive` as a new function. The diff is not very helpful (imho).
Make RwLockReadGuard covariant
Hi, first time contributor here, if anything is not as expected, please let me know.
`RwLockReadGoard`'s type constructor is invariant. Since it behaves like a smart pointer to an immutable reference, there is no reason that it should not be covariant. Take e.g.
```
fn test_read_guard_covariance() {
fn do_stuff<'a>(_: RwLockReadGuard<'_, &'a i32>, _: &'a i32) {}
let j: i32 = 5;
let lock = RwLock::new(&j);
{
let i = 6;
do_stuff(lock.read().unwrap(), &i);
}
drop(lock);
}
```
where the compiler complains that &i doesn't live long enough. If `RwLockReadGuard` is covariant, then the above code is accepted because the lifetime can be shorter than `'a`.
In order for `RwLockReadGuard` to be covariant, it can't contain a full reference to the `RwLock`, which can never be covariant (because it exposes a mutable reference to the underlying data structure). By reducing the data structure to the required pieces of `RwLock`, the rest falls in place.
If there is a better way to do a test that tests successful compilation, please let me know.
Fixes#80392
This reduces the size of the function signature index, because
it's common to have many functions that operate on the same types.
$ wc -c search-index-old.js search-index-new.js
5224374 search-index-old.js
3932314 search-index-new.js
By my math, this reduces the uncompressed size of the search index by 32%.
On compressed signatures, the wins are less drastic, a mere 8%:
$ wc -c search-index-old.js.gz search-index-new.js.gz
404532 search-index-old.js.gz
371635 search-index-new.js.gz
Now that typed identifiers are used in both derives, constructors for
the `DiagnosticMessage` and `SubdiagnosticMessage` types are not
required.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
As in the diagnostic derive, using typed identifiers in the
subdiagnostic derive improves the diagnostics of using the subdiagnostic
derive as Fluent messages will be confirmed to exist at compile-time.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
