interpret/provenance_map: consistently use range_is_empty
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137704 started using this for per-ptr provenance; let's be consistent and use it also for the per-byte provenance check. Also rename the methods to avoid having both "get" and "is_empty" in the name.
r? ````@oli-obk````
Improve error message for `AsyncFn` trait failure for RPIT
Use a `WellFormedDerived` obligation cause to make sure we can turn an `AsyncFnKindHelper` trait goal into its parent `AsyncFn*` goal, then fix the logic for reporting `AsyncFn*` kind mismatches.
Best reviewed without whitespace.
Fixes#137905
r? oli-obk
Add minimal platform support documentation for powerpc-unknown-linux-gnuspe
Per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137860#issuecomment-2692358259, add minimal platform support documentation, including a brief summary and links to more detailed information about this target.
The added documentation is minimal. This is somewhat similar to [powerpc-unknown-openbsd, which also has no target maintainer](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/platform-support/powerpc-unknown-openbsd.html). The rest of the template is left to target maintainers.
I also updated powerpc-unknown-linux-muslspe platform support documentation and added link to powerpc-unknown-linux-gnuspe platform support documentation.
cc ```@glaubitz```
cc ```@BKPepe```
r? workingjubilee
```@rustbot``` label +O-PowerPC
Provide more context on resolve error caused from incorrect RTN
When encountering a resolve E0575 error for an associated method (when a type was expected), see if it could have been an intended return type notation bound.
```
error[E0575]: expected associated type, found associated function `Trait::method`
--> $DIR/bad-inputs-and-output.rs:31:36
|
LL | fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where <T as Trait>::method(i32): Send {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not a associated type
|
help: you might have meant to use the return type notation syntax
|
LL - fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where <T as Trait>::method(i32): Send {}
LL + fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where T::method(..): Send {}
|
```
Built on top of #137824, only second commit is relevant for review.
r? ````````@compiler-errors````````
Clarify why InhabitedPredicate::instantiate_opt exists
At first glance, the extra casework seems pointless and needlessly error-prone. Clarify that there is a reason for it being there.
miri native-call support: all previously exposed provenance is accessible to the callee
When Miri invokes a native C function, the memory C can access needs to be "prepared": to avoid false positives, we need to consider all that memory initialized, and we need to consider it to have arbitrary provenance. So far we did this for all pointers passed to C, but not for pointers that were exposed already before the native call. This PR adjusts the logic so that we now "prepare" all memory that has ever been exposed.
This fixes cases such as:
- cast a pointer to integer, send that integer to C, and access the memory there (`test_pass_ptr_as_int`)
- send a pointer to some memory to C, which stores it somewhere; then in Rust store another pointer in that memory, and access that via C (`test_pass_ptr_via_previously_shared_mem`)
r? `````@oli-obk`````
Fix char count in `Display` for `ByteStr`
`ByteStr as Display` performs a byte count when a char count is required.
r? ```````````@joshtriplett```````````
fix usage of ty decl macro fragments in attributes
See the test case. Due to one missing code path (and also the changes in #137517), using $ty or other specific fragments as part of an attr wouldn't work. $tt used to work since it wouldn't be parsed anywhere along the way.
Closes#137662
Re-add `Clone`-derive on `Thir`
This PR adds back `Clone` for `Thir`.
If a tool wants to access a `thir_body` query result in the `Callbacks::after_analysis` hook, it can't do so (I think) without a `Clone` impl on `Thir`, because `check_unsafety` steals the value. With `Clone`, the `thir_body` query provider can be overriden to cache a clone of the `Thir`, circumventing that issue.
Specifically, we need it for https://github.com/rust-corpus/qrates, [here](ca7a230196/extractor/src/lib.rs (L205)).
Please let me know if there are issues with this PR/if there's another way to solve the problem at hand
Add DWARF test case for non-C-like `repr128` enums
LLVM 20 fixes DWARF debuginfo for non-C-like 128-bit enums: this PR adds a test case to the `repr128-dwarf` test to ensure that LLVM doesn't regress in the future.
Tracking issue: #56071
Try to point of macro expansion from resolver and method errors if it involves macro var
In the case that a macro caller passes an identifier into a macro generating a path or method expression, point out that identifier in the context of the *macro* so it's a bit more clear how the macro is involved in causing the error.
r? ``````````@estebank`````````` or reassign
Match Ergonomics 2024: add context and examples to the unstable book
The examples here are pretty limited and don't illustrate the differences between the two feature gates, but my hope is that they get the general idea across. I can try and add some more nuance or more comprehensive examples too if that would help.
Hopefully the doctest isn't too sneaky. I wanted to make the bindings' types explicit, and the most readable way I could think of was to use a helper.
~~Unfortunately it looks like the "run this code" button doesn't work yet, but I made sure the examples are cross-edition, so that should resolve on its own once playground's nightly updates (or if playground's default becomes edition 2024, or if the edition in the markdown gets forwarded to playground).~~ It looks like the default edition on playground is now 2024, so the run button works! There's no output, but having a button to show that it compiles is nice, I think.
Relevant tracking issue: #123076
r? ``````@Nadrieril``````
Remove `MaybeForgetReturn` suggestion
#115196 implemented a suggestion to add a missing `return` when there is an ambiguity error, when that ambiguity error could be constrained by the return type of the function.
I initially reviewed it and thought it could be useful; however, looking back at that code now, I feel like it's a bit too much of a hack to be worth keeping around in typeck, especially given how rare it's expected to fire in practice. This is especially true because it depends on `StashKey::MaybeForgetReturn`, which is only stashed when we have *Sized* obligation ambiguity errors. Let's remove it for now.
I'd like to note that it's basically impossible to get this suggestion to apply in its current state except for what I'd consider somewhat artificial examples, involving no generic trait bounds. For example, it's not triggered for:
```rust
struct W<T>(T);
fn bar<T: Default>() -> W<T> { todo!() }
fn foo() -> W<i32> {
if true {
bar();
}
W(0)
}
```
Nor is it triggered for:
```
fn foo() -> i32 {
if true {
Default::default();
}
0
}
```
It's basically only triggered iff there's only one ambiguity error on the type, which is `Sized`.
Generally, suggesting something that affects control flow is a pretty dramatic suggestion; therefore, both the accuracy and precision of this diagnostic should be pretty high.
One other, somewhat unrelated observation is that this might be using stashed diagnostics incorrectly (or at least unnecessarily). Stashed diagnostics are used when error detection is fragmented over several major stages of the compiler, like a parse or resolver error which later can be recovered in typeck. However, this one is a bit different since it is fully handled within typeck -- perhaps that suggests that if this were to be reimplemented, it wouldn't need to be so complicated of an implementation.
Pattern types: Avoid having to handle an Option for range ends in the type system or the HIR
Instead,
1. during hir_ty_lowering, we now generate constants for the min/max when the range doesn't have a start/end specified.
2. in a later commit we generate those constants during ast lowering, simplifying everything further by not having to handle the range end inclusivity anymore in the type system (and thus avoiding any issues of `0..5` being different from `0..=4`
I think it makes all the type system code simpler, and the cost of the extra `ConstKind::Value` processing seems negligible.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
cc `@joshtriplett` `@scottmcm`
Document workings of successors more clearly
This is an attempt to fix#135087 together with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135886, but I am not sure if I've succeeded in adding much clarity here, so don't be shy with your comments.
Implement `&pin const self` and `&pin mut self` sugars
This PR implements part of #130494.
It introduces the sugars `&pin const self` and `&pin mut self` for `self: Pin<&Self>` and `self: Pin<&mut Self>`.
handle forced compiler and revert #137476
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138004
I would appreciate it if we could measure CI pipelines with the current changes to see if this reduces recent CI overhead. cc `@rust-lang/infra`
try-job: dist-powerpc64le-linux
