Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136458 (Do not deduplicate list of associated types provided by dyn principal)
- #136474 ([`compiletest`-related cleanups 3/7] Make the distinction between sources root vs test suite sources root in compiletest less confusing)
- #136592 (Make sure we don't overrun the stack in canonicalizer)
- #136787 (Remove `lifetime_capture_rules_2024` feature)
- #137207 (Add #[track_caller] to Duration Div impl)
- #137245 (Tweak E0277 when predicate comes indirectly from ?)
- #137257 (Ignore fake borrows for packed field check)
- #137399 (fix ICE in layout computation with unnormalizable const)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fix ICE in layout computation with unnormalizable const
The first commit reverts half of 7a667d206c, where I removed a case from `layout_of` for handling non-generic unevaluated consts in array length, that I incorrectly assumed to be unreachable. This can actually happen with the combination of `feature(generic_const_exprs)` and `feature(trivial_bounds)`, because GCE makes anon consts inherit their parent's predicates and with an impossible predicate like `u8: A` it's possible to have an array whose length is an associated const like `<u8 as A>::B` that is not generic, but also can't be normalized:
```rust
#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]
#![feature(trivial_bounds)]
trait A {
const B: usize;
}
// With GCE + trivial bounds this definition is not a compile error.
// Computing the layout of this type shouldn't ICE.
struct S([u8; <u8 as A>::B])
where
u8: A;
```
---
The first commit also incidentally fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137308, which also managed to get an unnormalizable assoc const into an array length:
```rust
trait A {
const B: usize;
}
impl<C: ?Sized> A for u8 { //~ ERROR: the type parameter `C` is not constrained
const B: usize = 42;
}
// Computing the layout of this type shouldn't ICE, even with the compile error above.
struct S([u8; <u8 as A>::B]);
```
This happens, because we bail out from `codegen_select_candidate` with an error if the selected impl has unconstrained params to avoid leaking infer vars out of a query. `Instance::try_resolve` will then return `Ok(None)`, which for assoc consts roughly means "this const can't be evaluated in a generic context" and is treated as such: 71e06b9c59/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/queries.rs (L84) (and this can ICE if the const isn't generic: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135617).
However, here `<u8 as A>::B` is definitely not "too generic" and also not unresolvable due to an unsatisfiable `u8: A` bound, so I've included the second commit to change the result of `Instance::try_resolve` from `Ok(None)` to `Err(ErrorGuaranteed)` when resolving an assoc item to an impl with unconstrained generic params. This has the effect that `<u8 as A>::B` will now be normalized to `ConstKind::Error` in the example above.
This properly fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137308, by no longer treating `<u8 as A>::B` as unresolvable even though it clearly has a unique impl that it resolves to. It also has the effect of changing the layout error from `Unknown` ("the type may be valid but has no sensible layout") to `ReferencesError` ("a non-layout error is reported elsewhere") which seems more appropriate.
r? ```@compiler-errors```
Ignore fake borrows for packed field check
We should not emit unaligned packed field reference errors for the fake borrows that we generate during match lowering.
These fake borrows are there to ensure in *borrow-checking* that we don't modify the value being matched (which is why this only occurs when there's a match guard, in this case `if true`), but they are removed after the MIR is processed by `CleanupPostBorrowck`, since they're really just there to cause borrowck errors if necessary.
I modified `PlaceContext::is_borrow` since that's used by the packed field check:
17c1c329a5/compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/check_packed_ref.rs (L40)
It's only used in one other place, in the SROA optimization (by which fake borrows are removed, so it doesn't matter):
17c1c329a5/compiler/rustc_mir_dataflow/src/value_analysis.rs (L922)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137250
Tweak E0277 when predicate comes indirectly from ?
When a `?` operation requires an `Into` conversion with additional bounds (like having a concrete error but wanting to convert to a trait object), we handle it speficically and provide the same kind of information we give other `?` related errors.
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error: `E: std::error::Error` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:7:13
|
LL | fn foo() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
| -------------------------------------- required `E: std::error::Error` because of this
LL | Ok(bar()?)
| -----^ the trait `std::error::Error` is not implemented for `E`
| |
| this has type `Result<_, E>`
|
note: `E` needs to implement `std::error::Error`
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:1:1
|
LL | struct E;
| ^^^^^^^^
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= note: required for `Box<dyn std::error::Error>` to implement `From<E>`
```
Avoid talking about `FromResidual` when other more relevant information is being given, particularly from `rust_on_unimplemented`.
Fix#137238.
-----
CC #137232, which was a smaller step related to this.
Do not deduplicate list of associated types provided by dyn principal
## Background
The way that we handle a dyn trait type's projection bounds is very *structural* today. A dyn trait is represented as a list of `PolyExistentialPredicate`s, which in most cases will be a principal trait (like `Iterator`) and a list of projections (like `Item = u32`). Importantly, the list of projections comes from user-written associated type bounds on the type *and* from elaborating the projections from the principal's supertraits.
For example, given a set of traits like:
```rust
trait Foo<T> {
type Assoc;
}
trait Bar<A, B>: Foo<A, Assoc = A> + Foo<B, Assoc = B> {}
```
For the type `dyn Bar<i32, u32>`, the list of projections will be something like `[Foo<i32>::Assoc = i32, Foo<u32>::Assoc = u32]`. We deduplicate these projections when they're identical, so for `dyn Bar<(), ()>` would be something like `[Foo<()>::Assoc = ()]`.
## Shortcomings 1: inference
We face problems when we begin to mix this structural notion of projection bounds with inference and associated type normalization. For example, let's try calling a generic function that takes `dyn Bar<A, B>` with a value of type `dyn Bar<(), ()>`:
```rust
trait Foo<T> {
type Assoc;
}
trait Bar<A, B>: Foo<A, Assoc = A> + Foo<B, Assoc = B> {}
fn call_bar<A, B>(_: &dyn Bar<A, B>) {}
fn test(x: &dyn Bar<(), ()>) {
call_bar(x);
// ^ ERROR mismatched types
}
```
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:10:14
|
10 | call_bar(x);
| -------- ^ expected trait `Bar<_, _>`, found trait `Bar<(), ()>`
```
What's going on here? Well, when calling `call_bar`, the generic signature `&dyn Bar<?A, ?B>` does not unify with `&dyn Bar<(), ()>` because the list of projections differ -- `[Foo<?A>::Assoc = ?A, Foo<?B>::Assoc = ?B]` vs `[Foo<()>::Assoc = ()]`.
A simple solution to this may be to unify the principal traits first, then attempt to deduplicate them after inference. In this case, if we constrain `?A = ?B = ()`, then we would be able to deduplicate those projections in the first list.
However, this idea is still pretty fragile, and it's not a complete solution.
## Shortcomings 2: normalization
Consider a slightly modified example:
```rust
//@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
trait Mirror {
type Assoc;
}
impl<T> Mirror for T {
type Assoc = T;
}
fn call_bar(_: &dyn Bar<(), <() as Mirror>::Assoc>) {}
fn test(x: &dyn Bar<(), ()>) {
call_bar(x);
}
```
This fails in the new solver. In this example, we try to unify `dyn Bar<(), ()>` and `dyn Bar<(), <() as Mirror>::Assoc>`. We are faced with the same problem even though there are no inference variables, and making this work relies on eagerly and deeply normalizing all projections so that they can be structurally deduplicated.
This is incompatible with how we handle associated types in the new trait solver, and while we could perhaps support it with some major gymnastics in the new solver, it suggests more fundamental shortcomings with how we deal with projection bounds in the new solver.
## Shortcomings 3: redundant projections
Consider a final example:
```rust
trait Foo {
type Assoc;
}
trait Bar: Foo<Assoc = ()> {}
fn call_bar1(_: &dyn Bar) {}
fn call_bar2(_: &dyn Bar<Assoc = ()>) {}
fn main() {
let x: &dyn Bar<Assoc = _> = todo!();
call_bar1(x);
//~^ ERROR mismatched types
call_bar2(x);
//~^ ERROR mismatched types
}
```
In this case, we have a user-written associated type bound (`Assoc = _`) which overlaps the bound that comes from the supertrait projection of `Bar` (namely, `Foo<Assoc = ()>`). In a similar way to the two examples above, this causes us to have a projection list mismatch that the compiler is not able to deduplicate.
## Solution
### Do not deduplicate after elaborating projections when lowering `dyn` types
The root cause of this issue has to do with mismatches of the deduplicated projection list before and after substitution or inference. This PR aims to avoid these issues by *never* deduplicating the projection list after elaborating the list of projections from the *identity* substituted principal trait ref.
For example,
```rust
trait Foo<T> {
type Assoc;
}
trait Bar<A, B>: Foo<A, Assoc = A> + Foo<B, Assoc = B> {}
```
When computing the projections for `dyn Bar<(), ()>`, before this PR we'd elaborate `Bar<(), ()>` to find a (deduplicated) projection list of `[Foo<()>::Assoc = ()]`.
After this PR, we take the principal trait and use its *identity* substitutions `Bar<A, B>` during elaboration, giving us projections `[Foo<A>::Assoc = A, Foo<B>::Assoc = B]`. Only after this elaboration do we substitute `A = (), B = ()` to get `[Foo<()>::Assoc = (), Foo<()>::Assoc = ()]`. This allows the type to be unified with the projections for `dyn Bar<?A, ?B>`, which are `[Foo<?A>::Assoc = ?A, Foo<?B>::Assoc = ?B]`.
This helps us avoid shorcomings 1 noted above.
### Do not deduplicate projections when relating `dyn` types
Similarly, we also do not call deduplicate when relating dyn types. This means that the list of projections does not differ depending on if the type has been normalized or not, which should avoid shortcomings 2 noted above.
Following from the example above, when relating projection lists like `[Foo<()>::Assoc = (), Foo<()>::Assoc = ()]` and `[Foo<?A>::Assoc = ?A, Foo<?B>::Assoc = ?B]`, the latter won't be deduplicated to a list of length 1 which would immediately fail to relate to the latter which is a list of length 2.
### Implement proper precedence between supertrait and user-written projection bounds when lowering `dyn` types
```rust
trait Foo {
type Assoc;
}
trait Bar: Foo<Assoc = ()> {}
```
Given a type like `dyn Foo<Assoc = _>`, we used to previously include *both* the supertrait and user-written associated type bounds in the projection list, giving us `[Foo::Assoc = (), Foo::Assoc = _]`. This would never unify with `dyn Foo`. However, this PR implements a strategy which overwrites the supertrait associated type bound with the one provided by the user, giving us a projection list of `[Foo::Assoc = _]`.
Why is this OK? Well, if a user wrote an associated type bound that is unsatisfiable (e.g. `dyn Bar<Assoc = i32>`) then the dyn type would never implement `Bar` or `Foo` anyways. If the user wrote something that is either structurally equal or equal modulo normalization to the supertrait bound, then it should be unaffected. And if the user wrote something that needs inference guidance (e.g. `dyn Bar<Assoc = _>`), then it'll be constrained when proving `dyn Bar<Assoc = _>: Bar`.
Importantly, this differs from the strategy in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133397, which preferred the *supertrait* bound and ignored the user-written bound. While that's also theoretically justifiable in its own way, it does lead to code which does not (and probably should not) compile either today or after this PR, like:
```rust
trait IteratorOfUnit: Iterator<Item = ()> {}
impl<T> IteratorOfUnit for T where T: Iterator<Item = ()> {}
fn main() {
let iter = [()].into_iter();
let iter: &dyn IteratorOfUnit<Item = i32> = &iter;
}
```
### Conclusion
This is a far less invasive change compared to #133397, and doesn't necessarily necessitate the addition of new lints or any breakage of existing code. While we could (and possibly should) eventually introduce lints to warn users of redundant or mismatched associated type bounds, we don't *need* to do so as part of fixing this unsoundness, which leads me to believe this is a much safer solution.
More sophisticated span trimming for suggestions
Previously #136958 only cared about prefixes or suffixes. Now it detects more cases where a suggestion is "sandwiched" by unchanged code on the left or the right. Would be cool if we could detect several insertions, like `ACE` going to `ABCDE`, extracting `B` and `D`, but that seems unwieldy.
r? `@estebank`
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error: `E: std::error::Error` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:7:13
|
LL | fn foo() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
| -------------------------------------- required `E: std::error::Error` because of this
LL | Ok(bar()?)
| -----^ the trait `std::error::Error` is not implemented for `E`
| |
| this has type `Result<_, E>`
|
note: `E` needs to implement `std::error::Error`
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:1:1
|
LL | struct E;
| ^^^^^^^^
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
= note: required for `Box<dyn std::error::Error>` to implement `From<E>`
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error to `X`
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:18:13
|
LL | fn bat() -> Result<(), X> {
| ------------- expected `X` because of this
LL | Ok(bar()?)
| -----^ the trait `From<E>` is not implemented for `X`
| |
| this can't be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<_, E>`
|
note: `X` needs to implement `From<E>`
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:4:1
|
LL | struct X;
| ^^^^^^^^
note: alternatively, `E` needs to implement `Into<X>`
--> $DIR/bad-question-mark-on-trait-object.rs:1:1
|
LL | struct E;
| ^^^^^^^^
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
```
Refactor `OperandRef::extract_field` to prep for MCP838
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/838
This still supports exactly the same cases as it did before, just rearranged a bit to better emphasize what doesn't work.
Currently, marking a dependency private does not automatically make all
its child dependencies private. Resolve this by making its children
private by default as well.
This also resolves some FIXMEs for tests that are intended to fail but
previously passed.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135501#issuecomment-2620242419
In [1], most dependencies of `std` and other sysroot crates were marked
private, but this did not happen for `alloc` and `test`. Update these
here, marking public standard library crates as the only non-private
dependencies.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111076
Remove the portion of ed63539282 that automatically sets crates private
based on whether they are dependencies of `std`. Instead, this is
controlled by dependency configuration in `Cargo.toml`.
`compiler_builtins` is currently injected as `extern crate
compiler_builtins as _`. This has made gating via diagnostics difficult
because it appears in the crate graph as a non-private dependency, and
there isn't an easy way to differentiate between the injected AST and
user-specified `extern crate compiler_builtins`.
Resolve this by injecting `compiler_builtins` during postprocessing
rather than early in the AST. Most of the time this isn't even needed
because it shows up in `std` or `core`'s crate graph, but injection is
still needed to ensure `#![no_core]` works correctly.
A similar change was attempted at [1] but this encountered errors
building `proc_macro` and `rustc-std-workspace-std`. Similar failures
showed up while working on this patch, which were traced back to
`compiler_builtins` showing up in the graph twice (once via dependency
and once via injection). This is resolved by not injecting if a
`#![compiler_builtins]` crate already exists.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113634
The only case where can_reuse_cratenum could have been false in the past
are rustc plugins, support for which has been removed over a year ago
now. Nowadays the only case where locator.tuple is not target_triple is
when loading a proc macro, in which case we also set can_reuse_cratenum
to true. As such it is always true and we can remove some dead code.
Some codegen_llvm cleanups
Using some more safe wrappers and thus being able to remove a large unsafe block.
As a next step we should probably look into safe extern fns
