Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Esteban Küber
5b54286640 Remove detail from label/note that is already available in other note
Remove the "which is required by `{root_obligation}`" post-script in
"the trait `X` is not implemented for `Y`" explanation in E0277. This
information is already conveyed in the notes explaining requirements,
making it redundant while making the text (particularly in labels)
harder to read.

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
   |
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`
   |
   = note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
   |
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
   |                 ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
vs the prior

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
   |
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`, which is required by `Option<NotCopy>: Copy`
   |
   = note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
   |
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
   |                 ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
2024-10-29 16:26:57 +00:00
Michael Goulet
fb8d5f1e13 Actually just make can_eq process obligations (almost) everywhere 2024-07-05 11:59:54 -04:00
Michael Goulet
ae24ebe710 Rebase fallout 2024-06-12 21:17:33 -04:00
Oli Scherer
6cca6da126 Revert "When checking whether an impl applies, constrain hidden types of opaque types."
This reverts commit 29a630eb72.
2024-06-11 08:08:25 +00:00
Oli Scherer
29a630eb72 When checking whether an impl applies, constrain hidden types of opaque types.
We already handle this case this way on the coherence side, and it matches the new solver's behaviour. While there is some breakage around type-alias-impl-trait (see new "type annotations needed" in tests/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/issue-84660-unsoundness.rs), no stable code breaks, and no new stable code is accepted.
2024-05-23 15:52:10 +00:00
Oli Scherer
cdcca7e8f4 Switch can_eq and can_sub to DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes
They are mostly used in diagnostics anyway
2024-04-04 14:25:45 +00:00
Esteban Küber
6efddac288 Provide more context on derived obligation error primary label
Expand the primary span of E0277 when the immediate unmet bound is not what the user wrote:

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `i32: Bar` is not satisfied
 --> f100.rs:6:6
  |
6 |     <i32 as Foo>::foo();
  |      ^^^ the trait `Bar` is not implemented for `i32`, which is required by `i32: Foo`
  |
help: this trait has no implementations, consider adding one
 --> f100.rs:2:1
  |
2 | trait Bar {}
  | ^^^^^^^^^
note: required for `i32` to implement `Foo`
 --> f100.rs:3:14
  |
3 | impl<T: Bar> Foo for T {}
  |         ---  ^^^     ^
  |         |
  |         unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
```

Fix #40120.
2024-01-30 21:28:18 +00:00
Michael Goulet
7e38b70cc0 Split note, fix const/static impl trait error 2024-01-07 18:00:03 +00:00
Esteban Küber
041e54bd92 Tweak wording of E0562
Fix #80476.
2023-10-04 19:51:43 +00:00
Michael Goulet
b14eb0c497 pluralize stuff 2023-02-22 21:52:26 +00:00
Albert Larsan
cf2dff2b1e
Move /src/test to /tests 2023-01-11 09:32:08 +00:00
Renamed from src/test/ui/impl-trait/nested_impl_trait.stderr (Browse further)