Implement a few more rvalue translation to smir
Add the implementation for a few more RValue variants. For now, I simplified the stable version of `RValue::Ref` by removing the notion of Region.
r? `@oli-obk`
Structurally resolve in pattern matching when peeling refs in new solver
Let me know if you want me to commit the minimized test:
```rust
fn test() {}
fn test2() {}
fn main() {
let tests: &[(_, fn())] = &[
("test", test),
("test2", test2),
];
for (a, b) in tests {
todo!();
}
}
```
In that test above, the match scrutinee is `<std::vec::Iter<(&'static str, fn())> as Iterator>::Item`, which we cannot peel the refs from.
We also need to structurally resolve in the loop, since structural resolve is inherently shallow. I haven't come up with a test where this matters, but I can if you care.
Also, I removed two other calls to `resolve_vars_with_obligations` in diagnostics code that I'm pretty convinced are not useful.
r? `@lcnr`
Enable coinduction support for Safe Transmute
This patch adds the `#[rustc_coinductive]` annotation to `BikeshedIntrinsicFrom`, so that it's possible to compute transmutability for recursive types.
## Motivation
Safe Transmute currently already supports references (#110662). However, if a type is implemented recursively, it leads to an infinite loop when we try to check if transmutation is safe.
A couple simple examples that one might want to write, that are currently not possible to check transmutability for:
```rs
#[repr(C)] struct A(&'static B);
#[repr(C)] struct B(&'static A);
```
```rs
#[repr(C)]
enum IList<'a> { Nil, Cons(isize, &'a IList<'a>) }
#[repr(C)]
enum UList<'a> { Nil, Cons(usize, &'a UList<'a>) }
```
Previously, `@jswrenn` was considering writing a co-inductive solver from scratch, just for the `rustc_tranmsute` crate. Later on as I started working on Safe Transmute myself, I came across the `#[rustc_coinductive]` annotation, which is currently only being used for the `Sized` trait. Leveraging this trait actually solved the problem entirely, and it saves a lot of duplicate work that would have had to happen in `rustc_transmute`.
Uplift `clippy::fn_null_check` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::fn_null_check` lint into rustc.
## `incorrect_fn_null_checks`
(warn-by-default)
The `incorrect_fn_null_checks` lint checks for expression that checks if a function pointer is null.
### Example
```rust
let fn_ptr: fn() = /* somehow obtained nullable function pointer */
if (fn_ptr as *const ()).is_null() { /* ... */ }
```
### Explanation
Function pointers are assumed to be non-null, checking for their nullity is incorrect.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
`@rustbot` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
Uplift `clippy::fn_null_check` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::fn_null_check` lint into rustc.
## `incorrect_fn_null_checks`
(warn-by-default)
The `incorrect_fn_null_checks` lint checks for expression that checks if a function pointer is null.
### Example
```rust
let fn_ptr: fn() = /* somehow obtained nullable function pointer */
if (fn_ptr as *const ()).is_null() { /* ... */ }
```
### Explanation
Function pointers are assumed to be non-null, checking for their nullity is incorrect.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
`@rustbot` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
Rewrite `UnDerefer`, again
This PR is intended to improve the perf regression introduced by #112882.
`UnDerefer` has been separated out again for borrowck reasons. It was a bit overzealous to remove it in the previous PR.
r? `@oli-obk`
[lsp-server] Ignore 'Content-Length' case
this is a trivial PR meant to address issue #15197: the 'Content-Length' header field should probably be treated as case-insensitive
- moved work from `find_local` to `gather_statement`
- created custom iterator for `iter_projections`
- reverted change from `IndexVec` to `FxIndexMap`
From the test logs, other extern-fn-* tests have this:
[run-make] tests/run-make/extern-fn-with-packed-struct ... ignored, ignored when cross-compiling
[run-make] tests/run-make/extern-fn-with-union ... ignored, ignored when cross-compiling
[run-make] tests/run-make/extern-multiple-copies ... ignored, ignored when cross-compiling
[run-make] tests/run-make/extern-multiple-copies2 ... ignored, ignored when cross-compiling
[run-make] tests/run-make/extern-overrides-distribution ... ignored, ignored when cross-compiling
[run-make] tests/run-make/extra-filename-with-temp-outputs ... ignored, ignored when cross-compiling
[run-make] tests/run-make/extern-fn-explicit-align ... FAILED
alignment of `byval` on x86 in the process.
Commit 88e4d2c291 from five years ago removed
support for alignment on indirectly-passed arguments because of problems with
the `i686-pc-windows-msvc` target. Unfortunately, the `memcpy` optimizations I
recently added to LLVM 16 depend on this to forward `memcpy`s. This commit
attempts to fix the problems with `byval` parameters on that target and now
correctly adds the `align` attribute.
The problem is summarized in [this comment] by @eddyb. Briefly, 32-bit x86 has
special alignment rules for `byval` parameters: for the most part, their
alignment is forced to 4. This is not well-documented anywhere but in the Clang
source. I looked at the logic in Clang `TargetInfo.cpp` and tried to replicate
it here. The relevant methods in that file are
`X86_32ABIInfo::getIndirectResult()` and
`X86_32ABIInfo::getTypeStackAlignInBytes()`. The `align` parameter attribute
for `byval` parameters in LLVM must match the platform ABI, or miscompilations
will occur. Note that this doesn't use the approach suggested by eddyb, because
I felt it was overkill to store the alignment in `on_stack` when special
handling is really only needed for 32-bit x86.
As a side effect, this should fix#80127, because it will make the `align`
parameter attribute for `byval` parameters match the platform ABI on LLVM
x86-64.
[this comment]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80822#issuecomment-829985417
