This is for files that *participate* in actual tests but should not be
built by `compiletest` (i.e. these files are involved through `mod xxx;`
or `include!()` or `#[path = "xxx"]`, etc.).
A specialized directive like `//@ ignore-auxiliary` makes it way easier
to audit disabled tests via `//@ ignore-test`.
when using `opt-dist local` user probably won't need to run tests (for
various reasons). currently the only way to disable them is to set
`TRY_DIST_BUILD=1`, which is not obvious and can be bad for non-CI
envronments (as I guess)
when compiling target LLVM with `opt-dist local` on Windows/MinGW,
profraw files are being compressed with zlib, so compiling without it
will make `llvm-profdata` complain about lacking of zlib support. this
error is shown:
`profile uses zlib compression but the profile reader was built without
zlib support`
example from llvm test suite: 76b5fcbf97/llvm/test/tools/llvm-profdata/nocompress.test (L15)
Update cargo
4 commits in 864f74d4eadcaea3eeda37a2e7f4d34de233d51e..d811228b14ae2707323f37346aee3f4147e247e6
2025-04-11 20:37:27 +0000 to 2025-04-15 15:18:42 +0000
- use `zlib-rs` for gzip compression in rust code (rust-lang/cargo#15417)
- test(rustfix): Use `snapbox` for snapshot testing (rust-lang/cargo#15429)
- chore(deps): update rust crate gix to 0.71.0 [security] (rust-lang/cargo#15391)
- Make sure search paths inside OUT_DIR precede external paths (rust-lang/cargo#15221)
Also,
* The license exception of sha1_smol with BSD-3-Clause is no longer needed, as `gix-*` doesn't depend on it.
* Cargo depends on zlib-rs, which is distributed under Zlib license
r? ghost
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135340 (Add `explicit_extern_abis` Feature and Enforce Explicit ABIs)
- #139440 (rustc_target: RISC-V: feature addition batch 2)
- #139667 (cfi: Remove #[no_sanitize(cfi)] for extern weak functions)
- #139828 (Don't require rigid alias's trait to hold)
- #139854 (Improve parse errors for stray lifetimes in type position)
- #139889 (Clean UI tests 3 of n)
- #139894 (Fix `opt-dist` CLI flag and make it work without LLD)
- #139900 (stepping into impls for normalization is unproductive)
- #139915 (replace some #[rustc_intrinsic] usage with use of the libcore declarations)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
git: ignore `60600a6fa4` for blame purposes
60600a6fa4 was simply breaking up compiletest's `runtest.rs` and isn't very useful in git blame.
r? `@onur-ozkan`
Move eager translation to a method on Diag
This will allow us to eagerly translate messages on a top-level diagnostic, such as a `LintDiagnostic`. As a bonus, we can remove the awkward closure passed into Subdiagnostic and make better use of `Into`.
r? `@nnethercote`
Explicitly annotate edition for `unpretty=expanded` and `unpretty=hir` tests
These emit prelude imports which means they are always edition dependent and so running them with a different `--edition` will fail.
Consistent with treating Ctor Call as Struct in liveness analysis
Fixes#139627
When `ExprKind::Call` is a `Ctor`, skips the checking of `expr` and only checks the arguments, thus being consistent with `ExprKind::Struct`.
r? compiler
Stabilize `cfg_boolean_literals`
Closes#131204
`@rustbot` labels +T-lang +I-lang-nominated
This will end up conflicting with the test in #138293 so whichever doesn't land first will need updating
--
# Stabilization Report
## General design
### What is the RFC for this feature and what changes have occurred to the user-facing design since the RFC was finalized?
[RFC 3695](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3695), none.
### What behavior are we committing to that has been controversial? Summarize the major arguments pro/con.
None
### Are there extensions to this feature that remain unstable? How do we know that we are not accidentally committing to those?
None
## Has a call-for-testing period been conducted? If so, what feedback was received?
Yes; only positive feedback was received.
## Implementation quality
### Summarize the major parts of the implementation and provide links into the code (or to PRs)
Implemented in [#131034](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131034).
### Summarize existing test coverage of this feature
- [Basic usage, including `#[cfg()]`, `cfg!()` and `#[cfg_attr()]`](6d71251cf9/tests/ui/cfg/true-false.rs)
- [`--cfg=true/false` on the command line being accessible via `r#true/r#false`](6d71251cf9/tests/ui/cfg/raw-true-false.rs)
- [Interaction with the unstable `#[doc(cfg(..))]` feature](6d71251/tests/rustdoc-ui/cfg-boolean-literal.rs)
- [Denying `--check-cfg=cfg(true/false)`](6d71251/tests/ui/check-cfg/invalid-arguments.rs)
- Ensuring `--cfg false` on the command line doesn't change the meaning of `cfg(false)`: `tests/ui/cfg/cmdline-false.rs`
- Ensuring both `cfg(true)` and `cfg(false)` on the same item result in it being disabled: `tests/ui/cfg/both-true-false.rs`
### What outstanding bugs in the issue tracker involve this feature? Are they stabilization-blocking?
The above mentioned issue; it should not block as it interacts with another unstable feature.
### What FIXMEs are still in the code for that feature and why is it ok to leave them there?
None
### Summarize contributors to the feature by name for recognition and assuredness that people involved in the feature agree with stabilization
- `@clubby789` (RFC)
- `@Urgau` (Implementation in rustc)
### Which tools need to be adjusted to support this feature. Has this work been done?
`rustdoc`'s unstable`#[doc(cfg(..)]` has been updated to respect it. `cargo` has been updated with a forward compatibility lint to enable supporting it in cargo once stabilized.
## Type system and execution rules
### What updates are needed to the reference/specification? (link to PRs when they exist)
A few lines to be added to the reference for configuration predicates, specified in the RFC.
This will allow us to eagerly translate messages on a top-level
diagnostic, such as a `LintDiagnostic`. As a bonus, we can remove the
awkward closure passed into Subdiagnostic and make better use of
`Into`.
I'm removing empty identifiers everywhere, because in practice they
always mean "no identifier" rather than "empty identifier". (An empty
identifier is impossible.) It's better to use `Option` to mean "no
identifier" because you then can't forget about the "no identifier"
possibility.
Some specifics:
- When testing an attribute for a single name, the commit uses the
`has_name` method.
- When testing an attribute for multiple names, the commit uses the new
`has_any_name` method.
- When using `match` on an attribute, the match arms now have `Some` on
them.
In the tests, we now avoid printing empty identifiers by not printing
the identifier in the `error:` line at all, instead letting the carets
point out the problem.
This shows places where the use of `name_or_empty` causes problems, i.e.
we print empty identifiers in error messages:
```
error: unrecognized field name ``
error: `` isn't a valid `#[macro_export]` argument
`#[no_sanitize()]` should be applied to a function
```
(The last one is about an attribute `#[no_sanitize("address")]`.)
The next commit will fix these.
