Enable MIR inlining
Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82280 by `@wesleywiser.`
#82280 has shown nice compile time wins could be obtained by enabling MIR inlining.
Most of the issues in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81567 are now fixed,
except the interaction with polymorphization which is worked around specifically.
I believe we can proceed with enabling MIR inlining in the near future
(preferably just after beta branching, in case we discover new issues).
Steps before merging:
- [x] figure out the interaction with polymorphization;
- [x] figure out how miri should deal with extern types;
- [x] silence the extra arithmetic overflow warnings;
- [x] remove the codegen fulfilment ICE;
- [x] remove the type normalization ICEs while compiling nalgebra;
- [ ] tweak the inlining threshold.
cleanup mir visitor for `rustc::pass_by_value`
by changing `& $($mutability)?` to `$(& $mutability)?`
I also did some formatting changes because I started doing them for the visit methods I changed and then couldn't get myself to stop xx, I hope that's still fairly easy to review.
Accept `DiagnosticMessage` in `LintDiagnosticBuilder::build` so that
lints can be built with translatable diagnostic messages.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
move MIR syntax into a dedicated file and ping some people whenever it changes
Adding or changing MIR operations/statements/whatever should be under significant scrutiny wrt their wider impact, specified semantics, and so on. So let's start by putting all that into a dedicated file and pinging some people whenever that file changes.
This PR only moves definitions around, and then fiddles with imports until it all works again.
Only keep a single query for well-formed checking
There are currently 3 queries to perform wf checks on different item-likes. This complexity is not required.
This PR replaces the query by:
- one query per item;
- one query to invoke it for a whole module.
This allows to remove HIR `ParItemLikeVisitor`.
Check ADT field is well-formed before checking it is sized
Fixes#96810.
There is one diagnostics regression, in [`src/test/ui/generic-associated-types/bugs/issue-80626.stderr`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97780/files#diff-53795946378e78a0af23a10277c628ff79091c18090fdc385801ee70c1ba6963). I am not super concerned about it, since it's GAT related.
We _could_ fix it, possibly by using the `FieldSized` obligation cause code instead of `BuiltinDerivedObligation`. But that would require changing `Sized` trait confirmation and the `adt_sized_constraint` query.
Reverse folder hierarchy
#91318 introduced a trait for infallible folders distinct from the fallible version. For some reason (completely unfathomable to me now that I look at it with fresh eyes), the infallible trait was a supertrait of the fallible one: that is, all fallible folders were required to also be infallible. Moreover the `Error` associated type was defined on the infallible trait! It's so absurd that it has me questioning whether I was entirely sane.
This trait reverses the hierarchy, so that the fallible trait is a supertrait of the infallible one: all infallible folders are required to also be fallible (which is a trivial blanket implementation). This of course makes much more sense! It also enables the `Error` associated type to sit on the fallible trait, where it sensibly belongs.
There is one downside however: folders expose a `tcx` accessor method. Since the blanket fallible implementation for infallible folders only has access to a generic `F: TypeFolder`, we need that trait to expose such an accessor to which we can delegate. Alternatively it's possible to extract that accessor into a separate `HasTcx` trait (or similar) that would then be a supertrait of both the fallible and infallible folder traits: this would ensure that there's only one unambiguous `tcx` method, at the cost of a little additional boilerplate. If desired, I can submit that as a separate PR.
r? ````@jackh726````
Improve suggestion for calling fn-like expr on type mismatch
1.) Suggest calling values of with RPIT types (and probably TAIT) when we expect `Ty` and have `impl Fn() -> Ty`
2.) Suggest calling closures even when they're not assigned to a local variable first
3.) Drive-by fix of a pretty-printing bug (`impl Fn()-> Ty` => `impl Fn() -> Ty`)
r? ```@estebank```
Remove (transitive) reliance on sorting by DefId in pretty-printer
This moves us a step closer to removing the `PartialOrd/`Ord` impls
for `DefId`. See #90317
implement `iter_projections` function on `PlaceRef`
this makes the api more flexible. the original function now calls the PlaceRef
version to avoid duplicating the code.
Point at return expression for RPIT-related error
Certainly this needs some diagnostic refining, but I wanted to show that it was possible first and foremost. Not sure if this is the right approach. Open to feedback.
Fixes#80583
