The exact set of permissions granted when forming a raw reference is
currently undecided https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/56604.
To avoid presupposing any particular outcome, adjust the const
qualification to be compatible with decision where raw reference
constructed from `addr_of!` grants mutable access.
Use type based qualification for unions
Union field access is currently qualified based on the qualification of
a value previously assigned to the union. At the same time, every union
access transmutes the content of the union, which might result in a
different qualification.
For example, consider constants A and B as defined below, under the
current rules neither contains interior mutability, since a value used
in the initial assignment did not contain `UnsafeCell` constructor.
```rust
#![feature(untagged_unions)]
union U { i: u32, c: std::cell::Cell<u32> }
const A: U = U { i: 0 };
const B: std::cell::Cell<u32> = unsafe { U { i: 0 }.c };
```
To avoid the issue, the changes here propose to consider the content of
a union as opaque and use type based qualification for union types.
Fixes#90268.
`@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
Consider indirect mutation during const qualification dataflow
Previously a local would be qualified if either one of two separate data
flow computations indicated so. First determined if a local could
contain the qualif, but ignored any forms of indirect mutation. Second
determined if a local could be mutably borrowed (and so indirectly
mutated), but which in turn ignored the qualif.
The end result was incorrect because the effect of indirect mutation was
effectivelly ignored in the all but the final stage of computation.
In the new implementation the indirect mutation is directly incorporated
into the qualif data flow. The local variable becomes immediately
qualified once it is mutably borrowed and borrowed place type can
contain the qualif.
In general we will now reject additional programs, program that were
prevously unintentionally accepted.
There are also some cases which are now accepted but were previously
rejected, because previous implementation didn't consider whether
borrowed place could have the qualif under the consideration.
Fixes#90124.
r? `@ecstatic-morse`
Union field access is currently qualified based on the qualification of
a value previously assigned to the union. At the same time, every union
access transmutes the content of the union, which might result in a
different qualification.
For example, consider constants A and B as defined below, under the
current rules neither contains interior mutability, since a value used
in the initial assignment did not contain `UnsafeCell` constructor.
```rust
#![feature(untagged_unions)]
union U { i: u32, c: std::cell::Cell<u32> }
const A: U = U { i: 0 };
const B: std::cell::Cell<u32> = unsafe { U { i: 0 }.c };
```
To avoid the issue, the changes here propose to consider the content of
a union as opaque and use type based qualification for union types.
Previously a local would be qualified if either one of two separate data
flow computations indicated so. First determined if a local could
contain the qualif, but ignored any forms of indirect mutation. Second
determined if a local could be mutably borrowed (and so indirectly
mutated), but which in turn ignored the qualif.
The end result was incorrect because the effect of indirect mutation was
effectivelly ignored in the all but the final stage of computation.
In the new implementation the indirect mutation is directly incorporated
into the qualif data flow. The local variable becomes immediately
qualified once it is mutably borrowed and borrowed place type can
contain the qualif.
In general we will now reject additional programs, program that were
prevously unintentionally accepted.
There are also some cases which are now accepted but were previously
rejected, because previous implementation didn't consider whether
borrowed place could have the qualif under the consideration.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #85833 (Scrape code examples from examples/ directory for Rustdoc)
- #88041 (Make all proc-macro back-compat lints deny-by-default)
- #89829 (Consider types appearing in const expressions to be invariant)
- #90168 (Reset qualifs when a storage of a local ends)
- #90198 (Add caveat about changing parallelism and function call overhead)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Implement coherence checks for negative trait impls
The main purpose of this PR is to be able to [move Error trait to core](https://github.com/rust-lang/project-error-handling/issues/3).
This feature is necessary to handle the following from impl on box.
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> { ... }
```
Without having negative traits affect coherence moving the error trait into `core` and moving that `From` impl to `alloc` will cause the from impl to no longer compiler because of a potential future incompatibility. The compiler indicates that `&str` _could_ introduce an `Error` impl in the future, and thus prevents the `From` impl in `alloc` that would cause overlap with `From<E: Error> for Box<dyn Error>`. Adding `impl !Error for &str {}` with the negative trait coherence feature will disable this error by encoding a stability guarantee that `&str` will never implement `Error`, making the `From` impl compile.
We would have this in `alloc`:
```rust
impl From<&str> for Box<dyn Error> {} // A
impl<E> From<E> for Box<dyn Error> where E: Error {} // B
```
and this in `core`:
```rust
trait Error {}
impl !Error for &str {}
```
r? `@nikomatsakis`
This PR was built on top of `@yaahc` PR #85764.
Language team proposal: to https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues/96
to ensure that the local qualifs are affected by the state from previous
loop iterations only if the local is kept alive.
The change should be forward compatible with a stricter handling of
indirect assignments, since storage dead invalidates all existing
pointers to the local.
Fix const qualification when executed after promotion
The const qualification was so far performed before the promotion and
the implementation assumed that it will never encounter a promoted.
With `const_precise_live_drops` feature, checking for live drops is
delayed until after drop elaboration, which in turn runs after
promotion. so the assumption is no longer true. When evaluating
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is now possible to encounter promoteds.
Use type base qualification for the promoted. It is a sound
approximation in general, and in the specific case of promoteds and
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is precise.
Fixes#89938.
Adopt let_else across the compiler
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
```
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
To simplify it to:
```
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
```
By adopting the `let_else` feature (cc #87335).
The PR also updates the syn crate because the currently used version of the crate doesn't support `let_else` syntax yet.
Note: Generally I'm the person who *removes* usages of unstable features from the compiler, not adds more usages of them, but in this instance I think it hopefully helps the feature get stabilized sooner and in a better state. I have written a [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87335#issuecomment-944846205) on the tracking issue about my experience and what I feel could be improved before stabilization of `let_else`.
The const qualification was so far performed before the promotion and
the implementation assumed that it will never encounter a promoted.
With `const_precise_live_drops` feature, checking for live drops is
delayed until after drop elaboration, which in turn runs after
promotion. so the assumption is no longer true. When evaluating
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is now possible to encounter promoteds.
Use type base qualification for the promoted. It is a sound
approximation in general, and in the specific case of promoteds and
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is precise.
Changes from #88558 allowed using `~const Drop` in constants by
introducing a new `NeedsNonConstDrop` qualif.
The new qualif was also used for promotion purposes, and allowed
promotion to happen for values that needs to be dropped but which
do have a const drop impl.
Since for promoted the drop implementation is never executed,
this lead to observable change in behaviour. For example:
```rust
struct Panic();
impl const Drop for Panic {
fn drop(&mut self) {
panic!();
}
}
fn main() {
let _ = &Panic();
}
```
Restore the use of `NeedsDrop` qualif during promotion to avoid the issue.
This performs a substitution of code following the pattern:
let <id> = if let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
To simplify it to:
let <pat> = ... { identity } else { ... : ! };
By adopting the let_else feature.
Stabilize `const_panic`
Closes#51999
FCP completed in #89006
```@rustbot``` label +A-const-eval +A-const-fn +T-lang
cc ```@oli-obk``` for review (not `r?`'ing as not on lang team)
Add a separate error for `dyn Trait` in `const fn`
Previously "trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable" error was used for both trait bounds (`<T: Trait>`) and trait objects (`dyn Trait`). This was pretty confusing.
This PR adds a separate error for trait objects: "trait objects in const fn are unstable". The error for trait bounds is otherwise intact.
This is follow up to #88907
r? ``@estebank``
``@rustbot`` label: +A-diagnostics
Fast reject for NeedsNonConstDrop
Hopefully fixes the regression in #88558.
I've always wanted to help with the performance of rustc, but it doesn't feel the same when you are fixing a regression caused by your own PR...
r? `@oli-obk`
Allow `panic!("{}", computed_str)` in const fn.
Special-case `panic!("{}", arg)` and translate it to `panic_display(&arg)`. `panic_display` will behave like `panic_any` in cosnt eval and behave like `panic!(format_args!("{}", arg))` in runtime.
This should bring Rust 2015 and 2021 to feature parity in terms of `const_panic`; and hopefully would unblock the stabilisation of #51999.
`@rustbot` modify labels: +T-compiler +T-libs +A-const-eval +A-const-fn
r? `@oli-obk`
Previously "trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable"
error was used for both trait bounds (<T: Trait>) and trait objects (dyn Trait).
This was pretty confusing.
This patch adds a separeta error for trait objects: "trait objects in const fn
are unstable". The error for trait bounds is otherwise intact.
Highlight the `const fn` if error happened because of a bound on the impl block
Currently, for the following code, the compiler produces the errors like the
following:
```rust
struct Type<T>(T);
impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
const fn f() {}
}
```
```text
error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable
--> ./test.rs:3:6
|
3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
| ^
|
= note: see issue #57563 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57563> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
This can be confusing (especially to newcomers) since the error mentions "const fn parameters", but highlights only the impl.
This PR adds function highlighting, changing the error to the following:
```text
error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable
--> ./test.rs:3:6
|
3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
| ^
4 | pub const fn f() {}
| ---------------- function declared as const here
|
= note: see issue #57563 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57563> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
---
I've originally wanted to point directly to `const` token, but couldn't find a way to get it's span. It seems like this span is lost during the AST -> HIR lowering.
Also, since the errors for object casts in `const fn`s (`&T` -> `&dyn Trait`) seem to trigger the same error, this PR accidentally changes these errors too. Not sure if it's desired or how to fix this.
P.S. it's my first time contributing to diagnostics, so feedback is very appreciated!
---
r? ```@estebank```
```@rustbot``` label: +A-diagnostics
Const drop
The changes are pretty primitive at this point. But at least it works. ^-^
Problems with the current change that I can think of now:
- [x] `~const Drop` shouldn't change anything in the non-const world.
- [x] types that do not have drop glues shouldn't fail to satisfy `~const Drop` in const contexts. `struct S { a: u8, b: u16 }` This might not fail for `needs_non_const_drop`, but it will fail in `rustc_trait_selection`.
- [x] The current change accepts types that have `const Drop` impls but have non-const `Drop` glue.
Fixes#88424.
Significant Changes:
- `~const Drop` is no longer treated as a normal trait bound. In non-const contexts, this bound has no effect, but in const contexts, this restricts the input type and all of its transitive fields to either a) have a `const Drop` impl or b) can be trivially dropped (i.e. no drop glue)
- `T: ~const Drop` will not be linted like `T: Drop`.
- Instead of recursing and iterating through the type in `rustc_mir::transform::check_consts`, we use the trait system to special case `~const Drop`. See [`rustc_trait_selection::...::candidate_assembly#assemble_const_drop_candidates`](https://github.com/fee1-dead/rust/blob/const-drop/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/candidate_assembly.rs#L817) and others.
Changes not related to `const Drop`ping and/or changes that are insignificant:
- `Node.constness_for_typeck` no longer returns `hir::Constness::Const` for type aliases in traits. This was previously used to hack how we determine default bound constness for items. But because we now use an explicit opt-in, it is no longer needed.
- Removed `is_const_impl_raw` query. We have `impl_constness`, and the only existing use of that query uses `HirId`, which means we can just operate it with hir.
- `ty::Destructor` now has a field `constness`, which represents the constness of the destructor.
r? `@oli-obk`
Currently, for the following code, the compiler produces the errors like the
following error:
```rust
struct Type<T>
impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
fn const f() {}
}
```
```text
error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable
--> ./test.rs:3:6
|
3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
| ^
|
= note: see issue #57563 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57563> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
This can be confusing (especially to newcomers) since the error mentions
"const fn parameters", but highlights only the impl.
This commits adds function highlighting, changing the error to the following:
```text
error[E0658]: trait bounds other than `Sized` on const fn parameters are unstable
--> ./test.rs:3:6
|
3 | impl<T: Clone> Type<T> {
| ^
4 | pub const fn f() {}
| ---------------- function declared as const here
|
= note: see issue #57563 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57563> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(const_fn_trait_bound)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
