Prevent DllImport from being attached to DSOLocal definitions in the
LLVM IR. The combination makes no sense, since definitions local to the
compilation unit will never be imported from external objects.
Additionally, LLVM will refuse the IR if it encounters the
combination (introduced in [1]):
if (GV.hasDLLImportStorageClass())
Assert(!GV.isDSOLocal(),
"GlobalValue with DLLImport Storage is dso_local!", &GV);
Right now, codegen-llvm will only apply DllImport to constants and rely
on call-stubs for functions. Hence, we simply extend the codegen of
constants to skip DllImport for any local definitions.
This was discovered when switching the EFI targets to the static
relocation model [2]. With this fixed, we can start another attempt at
this.
[1] 509132b368
[2] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101656
There is code for converting `Attribute` (syntactic) to `MetaItem`
(semantic). There is also code for the reverse direction. The reverse
direction isn't really necessary; it's currently only used when
generating attributes, e.g. in `derive` code.
This commit adds some new functions for creating `Attributes`s directly,
without involving `MetaItem`s: `mk_attr_word`, `mk_attr_name_value_str`,
`mk_attr_nested_word`, and
`ExtCtxt::attr_{word,name_value_str,nested_word}`.
These new methods replace the old functions for creating `Attribute`s:
`mk_attr_inner`, `mk_attr_outer`, and `ExtCtxt::attribute`. Those
functions took `MetaItem`s as input, and relied on many other functions
that created `MetaItems`, which are also removed: `mk_name_value_item`,
`mk_list_item`, `mk_word_item`, `mk_nested_word_item`,
`{MetaItem,MetaItemKind,NestedMetaItem}::token_trees`,
`MetaItemKind::attr_args`, `MetaItemLit::{from_lit_kind,to_token}`,
`ExtCtxt::meta_word`.
Overall this cuts more than 100 lines of code and makes thing simpler.
After 8689f5e landed, LLVM takes the intersection of v8a and v8r as default.
This commit brings back v8a support by explicitly specifying v8a in the feature list.
This should solve #97724.
Clean up pr 104954
UI test filename typo fix and a simple comment rewording. Thanks.
CC `@vincenzopalazzo` (you spelled your name wrongly in the FIXME)
r? `@estebank`
Revert #104269 (to avoid spurious hang/test failure in CI)
Causes hangs/memory overflows in the test suite apparently 😢Reopens#104225Fixes#104957
r? ``@lcnr``
In `Expander::expand` the code currently uses `mk_attr_outer` to convert
a `MetaItem` to an `Attribute`, and then follows that with
`meta_item_list` which converts back. This commit avoids the unnecessary
conversions.
There was one wrinkle: the existing conversions caused the bogus `<>` on
`Default<>` to be removed. With the conversion gone, we get a second
error message about the `<>`. This is a rare case, so I think it
probably doesn't matter much.
`check_builtin_attribute` calls `parse_meta` to convert an `Attribute`
to a `MetaItem`, which it then checks. However, many callers of
`check_builtin_attribute` start with a `MetaItem`, and then convert it
to an `Attribute` by calling `cx.attribute(meta_item)`. This `MetaItem`
to `Attribute` to `MetaItem` conversion is silly.
This commit adds a new function `check_builtin_meta_item`, which can be
called instead from these call sites. `check_builtin_attribute` also now
calls it. The commit also renames `check_meta` as `check_attr` to better
match its arguments.
`mk_const(ty::ConstKind::X(...), ty)` can now be simplified to
`mk_cosnt(..., ty)`.
I searched with the following regex: \mk_const\([\n\s]*(ty::)?ConstKind\
I've left `ty::ConstKind::{Bound, Error}` as-is, they seem clearer this
way.
- Accept `impl Into`
- Implement `From<>` for `ConstKind`
Note: this adds a dependency on `derive_more` (MIT license). It allows
to derive a lot of traits (like `From` here) that would be otherwise
tedious to implement.
stricter alignment enforcement for ScalarPair
`@eddyb` [indicated](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103926#discussion_r1033315005) that alignment violating this check might be a bug. So let's see what the test suite says.
(Only the 2nd commit actually changes behavior... but I couldn't not do that other cleanup.^^)
Does the PR CI runner even enable debug assertions though...?
