[on-demand] Turn monomorphic_const_eval into a proper query, not just a cache.
The error definitions and reporting logic, alongside with `eval_length` were moved to `librustc`.
Both local and cross-crate constant evaluation is on-demand now, but the latter is only used for `enum` discriminants, to replace the manual insertion into the cache which was done when decoding variants.
r? @nikomatsakis
rustdoc: add a list of headings to the sidebar
It's another misdreavus rustdoc PR, which means it's time for Bikeshed City once again! `:3`
In an effort to aid navigation in long documentation pages, this PR adds a listing of headings to the sidebars of pages where such headings exist. For example, for structs, links to their fields, inherent methods, and trait implementations are available where applicable.
Examples:
* Modules/Crate roots
* Enums
* Primitives
* Traits
* Structs
Open questions:
* Right now, these kinds of pages (and also unions) are the only pages that will receive the name header - pages for functions, constants, macros, etc, won't have the corresponding name in their sidebar. Should I print the name regardless and only add table-of-contents links for pages that have them? This would make them match, for example, a struct with no public fields, no methods, and no trait implementations. The latter would still have a "Struct MyStruct" line above the module contents, with no header links to speak of, whereas a function wouldn't even have "Function my\_function".
* This is only a header listing, but there has been requests to include a more-complete listing of fields/methods/traits/etc, for example in #41123.
Add a `TyErr` type to represent unknown types in places where
parse errors have happened, while still able to build the AST.
Initially only used to represent incorrectly written fn arguments and
avoid "expected X parameters, found Y" errors when called with the
appropriate amount of parameters. We cannot use `TyInfer` for this as
`_` is not allowed as a valid argument type.
Example output:
```rust
error: expected one of `:` or `@`, found `,`
--> file.rs:12:9
|
12 | fn bar(x, y: usize) {}
| ^
error[E0061]: this function takes 2 parameters but 3 parameters were supplied
--> file.rs:19:9
|
12 | fn bar(x, y) {}
| --------------- defined here
...
19 | bar(1, 2, 3);
| ^^^^^^^ expected 2 parameters
```
This is the full and proper fix for #32330. This also makes some effort
to give a nice error message (as evidenced by the `ui` test), sending
users over to the tracking issue for a full explanation.
Add warning for () to ! switch
With feature(never_type) enabled diverging type variables will default to `!` instead of `()`. This can cause breakages where a trait is resolved on such a type.
This PR emits a future-compatibility warning when it sees this happen.
Bounds parsing refactoring 2
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37511 for previous discussion.
cc @matklad
Relaxed parsing rules:
- zero bounds after `:` are allowed in all contexts.
- zero predicates are allowed after `where`.
- trailing separator `,` is allowed after predicates in `where` clauses not followed by `{`.
Other parsing rules:
- trailing separator `+` is still allowed in all bound lists.
Code is also cleaned up and tests added.
I haven't touched parsing of trait object types yet, I'll do it later.
Fixes rebase fallout, makes code correct in presence of 128-bit constants.
This commit includes manual merge conflict resolution changes from a rebase by @est31.
This commit introduces 128-bit integers. Stage 2 builds and produces a working compiler which
understands and supports 128-bit integers throughout.
The general strategy used is to have rustc_i128 module which provides aliases for iu128, equal to
iu64 in stage9 and iu128 later. Since nowhere in rustc we rely on large numbers being supported,
this strategy is good enough to get past the first bootstrap stages to end up with a fully working
128-bit capable compiler.
In order for this strategy to work, number of locations had to be changed to use associated
max_value/min_value instead of MAX/MIN constants as well as the min_value (or was it max_value?)
had to be changed to use xor instead of shift so both 64-bit and 128-bit based consteval works
(former not necessarily producing the right results in stage1).
This commit includes manual merge conflict resolution changes from a rebase by @est31.
