Let expressions on RHS shouldn't be terminating scopes
Fixes#100276.
Before this PR, we were unconditionally marking the RHS of short-circuiting binary expressions as a terminating scope.
In the case of a let chain where the `let` expression was on the RHS, this meant that temporaries within the `let` expr would only live until the end of the expression. Since this only affected the RHS, this led to surprising behavior ([example](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=d1b0a5d1f01882f9c89c2194a75eb19f)).
After this PR, we only mark the RHS as a terminating scope if it is not a `let` expression.
Standardize "use parentheses to call" suggestions between typeck and trait selection
1. Suggest calling constructors, since they're basically `FnDef`s but they have a different def kind and hir representation, so we were leaving them out.
2. Standardize the call suggestions between trait fulfillment errors and type mismatch. In the type mismatch suggestion, we suggest `/* Ty */` as the placeholder for an arg, and not the parameter's name, which is less helpful.
3. Use `predicate_must_hold_modulo_regions` instead of matching on `EvaluationResult` -- this might cause some suggestions to be filtered out, but we really shouldn't be suggesting a call if it "may" hold, only when it "must" hold.
4. Borrow some logic from `extract_callable_info` to generalize this suggestion to fn pointers, type parameters, and opaque types.
Fixes#102852
- Make the structure of the two variants more similar.
- Add some comments.
- Move various conditional `use` items inside the function that uses
them.
- Inline some closures.
The illumos linker does not support --strip-debug
When building and testing rust 1.64.0 on illumos, we saw a large number of failing tests associated with:
```
= note: ld: fatal: unrecognized option '--strip-debug'
ld: fatal: use the -z help option for usage information
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
```
The illumos linker does not support the `--strip-debug` option (although it does support `--strip-all`).
Make diagnostic for unsatisfied `Termination` bounds more precise
Don't blindly emit a diagnostic claiming that “*`main` has an invalid return type*” if we encounter a type that should but doesn't implement `std::process::Termination` and isn't actually the return type of the program entry `main`.
Fixes#103052.
``@rustbot`` label A-diagnostics T-compiler T-libs
r? diagnostics
PR #98758 introduced code to avoid redundant assertions in derived code
like this:
```
let _: ::core::clone::AssertParamIsClone<u32>;
let _: ::core::clone::AssertParamIsClone<u32>;
```
But the predicate `is_simple_path` introduced as part of this failed to
account for generic arguments. Therefore the deriving code erroneously
considers types like `Option<bool>` and `Option<f32>` to be the same.
This commit fixes `is_simple_path`.
Fixes#103157.
Remove "execute" bit from lock file permissions
Previously, flock would set the "execute" bit on Rust lock files. That makes no sense.
This patch clears the "execute" bit on Rust lock files.
See issue #102531.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #102454 (Suggest parentheses for possible range method calling)
- #102466 (only allow `ConstEquate` with `feature(gce)`)
- #102945 (Do not register placeholder `RegionOutlives` obligations when `considering_regions` is false)
- #103091 (rustdoc: remove unused HTML class `sidebar-title`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not register placeholder `RegionOutlives` obligations when `considering_regions` is false
**NOTE:** I'm kinda just putting this up for discussion. I'm not certain this is correct...?
This was introduced in [`608625d`](608625dae9 (diff-6e54b18681342ec725d75591dbf384ad08cd73df29db00485fe51b4e90f76ff7R361)).
Interestingly, we only check `data.has_placeholders()` for `RegionOutlives`, and not for `TypeOutlives`... why? For the record, that different treatment between `RegionOutlives` and `TypeOutlives` is why the fix "The compiling succeeds when all `'a : 'b` are replaced with `&'a () : 'b`" in #100689 _"works"_, but it seems like an implementation detail considering this.
Also, why do we care about placeholder regions being registered if `considering_regions` is false? It doesn't seem to affect any UI tests, for example.
r? `@lcnr`
Fixes#102899Fixes#100689
