For diagnostic information of Boolean, remind it as use the type: 'bool'
Fixes#98492.
It helps programmers coming from other languages
modified: compiler/rustc_resolve/src/late/diagnostics.rs
Avoid some `&str` to `String` conversions with `MultiSpan::push_span_label`
This patch removes some`&str` to `String` conversions with `MultiSpan::push_span_label`.
Remove excess rib while resolving closures
I've mentioned this on [zulip](286982959), in `rustc_resolve`, while resolving closures we add an excess `ClosureOrAsyncRibKind`. It's excess because we later add another one in `visit_fn`.
I couldn't find a way in which removing this will break anything, all test seem to pass, etc.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
cc ``@davidtwco``
Provide a `PathSegment.res` in more cases
I find that in many cases, the `res` associated with a `PathSegment` is `Res::Err` even though the path was fully resolved. A few diagnostics use this `res` and their error messages suffer because of the lack of resolved segment.
This fixes it a bit, but it's obviously not complete and I'm not exactly sure if it's correct.
Create elided lifetime parameters for function-like types
Split from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97720
This PR refactor lifetime generic parameters in bare function types and parenthesized traits to introduce the additional required lifetimes as fresh parameters in a `for<>` bound.
This PR does the same to lifetimes appearing in closure signatures, and as-if introducing `for<>` bounds on closures (without the associated change in semantics).
r? `@petrochenkov`
Don't omit comma when suggesting wildcard arm after macro expr
* Also adds `Span::eq_ctxt` to consolidate the various usages of `span.ctxt() == other.ctxt()`
* Also fixes an unhygenic usage of spans which caused the suggestion to render weirdly when we had one arm match in a macro
* Also always suggests a comma (i.e. even after a block) if we're rendering a wildcard arm in a single-line match (looks prettier 🌹)
Fixes#94866
Filter out intrinsics if we have other import candidates to suggest
Fixes#97618
Also open to just sorting these candidates to be last. Pretty easy to modify the code to do that, too.
Never regard macro rules with compile_error! invocations as unused
The very point of compile_error! is to never be reached, and one of
the use cases of the macro, currently also listed as examples in the
documentation of compile_error, is to create nicer errors for wrong
macro invocations. Thus, we should never warn about unused macro arms
that contain invocations of compile_error.
See also https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96150#issuecomment-1126599107 and the discussion after that.
Furthermore, the PR also contains two commits to silence `unused_macro_rules` when a macro has an invalid rule, and to add a test that `unused_macros` does not behave badly in the same situation.
r? `@petrochenkov` as I've talked to them about this
The very point of compile_error! is to never be reached, and one of
the use cases of the macro, currently also listed as examples in the
documentation of compile_error, is to create nicer errors for wrong
macro invocations. Thus, we shuuld never warn about unused macro arms
that contain invocations of compile_error.
