Commit graph

181 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zalathar
8ef67d0f01 coverage: Promote some debug-only checks to always run
These checks should be cheap, so there's little reason for them to be
debug-only.
2023-10-31 22:19:51 +11:00
Zalathar
10c4734c79 coverage: Use a tracing span to group the parts of a sum-up expression 2023-10-30 12:46:43 +11:00
Zalathar
2f1be08473 coverage: Inline the "recursive" worker methods for assigning counters
Now that we don't manually pass around indent levels, there's no need for these
worker methods to exist separately from their main callers.
2023-10-30 12:46:43 +11:00
Zalathar
6d69eb1f2e coverage: Replace manual debug indents with nested tracing spans 2023-10-30 12:46:43 +11:00
Matthias Krüger
e9df0b6b40
Rollup merge of #116974 - Zalathar:signature-spans, r=oli-obk,cjgillot
coverage: Fix inconsistent handling of function signature spans

While doing some more cleanup of `spans`, I noticed a strange inconsistency in how function signatures are handled. Normally the function signature span is treated as though it were executable as part of the start of the function, but in some cases the signature span disappears entirely from coverage, for no obvious reason.

This is caused by the fact that spans created by `CoverageSpan::for_fn_sig` don't add the span to their `merged_spans` field (unlike normal statement/terminator spans). In cases where the span-processing code looks at those merged spans, it thinks the signature span is no longer visible and deletes it.

Adding the signature span to `merged_spans` resolves the inconsistency.

(Prior to #116409 this wouldn't have been possible, because there was no case in the old `CoverageStatement` enum representing a signature. Now that `merged_spans` is just a list of spans, that's no longer an obstacle.)
2023-10-21 10:08:17 +02:00
Zalathar
ff02d9200c coverage: Simplify the injection of coverage statements 2023-10-21 12:33:33 +11:00
Zalathar
319693a927 coverage: Simplify initial creation of coverage spans 2023-10-21 11:56:15 +11:00
Zalathar
e16494469e coverage: Don't create an intermediate vec for each BCB's initial spans 2023-10-21 11:53:27 +11:00
Zalathar
a17ff82aae coverage: Handle fn signature spans more consistently near ? 2023-10-21 11:53:27 +11:00
Oli Scherer
60956837cf s/Generator/Coroutine/ 2023-10-20 21:10:38 +00:00
bors
94c4e5c411 Auto merge of #115214 - Urgau:rfc-3127-trim-paths, r=compiler-errors
Implement rustc part of RFC 3127 trim-paths

This PR implements (or at least tries to) [RFC 3127 trim-paths](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111540), the rustc part. That is `-Zremap-path-scope` with all of it's components/scopes.

`@rustbot` label: +F-trim-paths
2023-10-19 19:09:29 +00:00
Zalathar
13b2d604ec coverage: Store expression data in function coverage info
Even though expression details are now stored in the info structure, we still
need to inject `ExpressionUsed` statements into MIR, because if one is missing
during codegen then we know that it was optimized out and we can remap all of
its associated code regions to zero.
2023-10-18 23:44:34 +11:00
Zalathar
6da319f635 coverage: Store all of a function's mappings in function coverage info
Previously, mappings were attached to individual coverage statements in MIR.
That necessitated special handling in MIR optimizations to avoid deleting those
statements, since otherwise codegen would be unable to reassemble the original
list of mappings.

With this change, a function's list of mappings is now attached to its MIR
body, and survives intact even if individual statements are deleted by
optimizations.
2023-10-18 23:42:39 +11:00
Zalathar
79f935b96c coverage: Rename Operand to CovTerm
Later patches in this PR will use `CovTerm` to represent things that are not
expression operands.
2023-10-18 21:23:58 +11:00
Zalathar
a18c5f3b75 coverage: Store the number of counters/expressions in function coverage info
Coverage codegen can now allocate arrays based on the number of
counters/expressions originally used by the instrumentor.

The existing query that inspects coverage statements is still used for
determining the number of counters passed to `llvm.instrprof.increment`. If
some high-numbered counters were removed by MIR optimizations, the instrumented
binary can potentially use less memory and disk space at runtime.
2023-10-18 21:22:40 +11:00
Zalathar
c479bc7f3b coverage: Attach an optional FunctionCoverageInfo to mir::Body
This allows coverage information to be attached to the function as a whole when
appropriate, instead of being smuggled through coverage statements in the
function's basic blocks.

As an example, this patch moves the `function_source_hash` value out of
individual `CoverageKind::Counter` statements and into the per-function info.

When synthesizing unused functions for coverage purposes, the absence of this
info is taken to indicate that a function was not eligible for coverage and
should not be synthesized.
2023-10-18 21:20:29 +11:00
Urgau
eccc9e6628 [RFC 3127 - Trim Paths]: Condition remapped filepath on remap scopes 2023-10-17 10:11:30 +02:00
Arthur Lafrance
5895102c4d debug Span::ctxt() call detection 2023-10-16 19:50:29 -07:00
Zalathar
7aa1b8390b coverage: Explain why we temporarily steal pending_dups 2023-10-16 21:05:46 +11:00
Zalathar
5e5a8e7769 coverage: Inline span_bcb_dominates
Interacting with `basic_coverage_blocks` directly makes it easier to satisfy
the borrow checker when mutating `pending_dups` while reading other fields.
2023-10-16 21:05:46 +11:00
Zalathar
4ab4273d64 coverage: Inline prev_starts_after_next 2023-10-16 21:05:46 +11:00
Zalathar
25e6303202 coverage: Move take_curr and note what its callers are doing 2023-10-16 21:05:46 +11:00
Zalathar
41038dbe4a coverage: Call prev/curr less in other places
This reduces clutter, and makes it easier to notice regions where mutations
definitely don't occur.
2023-10-16 21:05:46 +11:00
Zalathar
b1c44f4a25 coverage: Call prev/curr less in to_refined_spans
This makes it easier to see that the non-initial cases assume that `prev` and
`curr` are set, and all operate on the same prev/curr references.
2023-10-16 21:05:46 +11:00
Zalathar
9bb27f3adf coverage: Remove redundant field prev_expn_span
This span can always be retrieved from `prev`, so there is no need to store it
separately.
2023-10-16 21:05:45 +11:00
Zalathar
7bbe4be568 coverage: Flatten guard logic in maybe_flush_pending_dups 2023-10-16 21:05:45 +11:00
Zalathar
97d1a9120e coverage: Flatten guard logic in maybe_push_macro_name_span 2023-10-16 21:05:33 +11:00
Zalathar
5f1e8f9950 coverage: Simplify push_refined_span
It turns out that all of the `len` manipulation here was just reimplementing
`last_mut`.
2023-10-16 20:54:36 +11:00
Zalathar
fa2e26285c coverage: Use DUMMY_SP instead of creating a dummy span manually
This patch also sorts the constructor fields into declaration order.
2023-10-16 20:54:36 +11:00
Zalathar
d928d3e5d8 coverage: Rename hold_pending_dups_unless_dominated to update_pending_dups 2023-10-16 20:54:16 +11:00
Zalathar
9b6ce4fb3c coverage: Rename check_pending_dups to maybe_flush_pending_dups
This method's main responsibility is to flush the pending dups into refined
spans, if appropriate.
2023-10-16 20:53:41 +11:00
Zalathar
46c545c1ba coverage: Rename check_invoked_macro_name_span to maybe_push_macro_name_span 2023-10-16 20:52:20 +11:00
Michael Goulet
b2d2184ede Format all the let chains in compiler 2023-10-13 08:59:36 +00:00
Zalathar
d99ab97b02 coverage: Simplify adding BCB successors to the traversal worklists 2023-10-12 22:37:58 +11:00
Zalathar
59f4f1c89d coverage: Don't store loop backedges in the traversal context
As long as we store the loop header BCB, we can look up its incoming loop
backedges as needed.
2023-10-12 21:41:13 +11:00
Zalathar
15360b3bc8 coverage: Store a graph reference in the graph traversal struct
Having to keep passing in a graph reference was a holdover from when the graph
was partly mutated during traversal. As of #114354 that is no longer necessary,
so we can simplify the traversal code by storing a graph reference as a field
in `TraverseCoverageGraphWithLoops`.
2023-10-12 21:41:13 +11:00
Zalathar
ea3fb7bc2c coverage: Use a VecDeque for loop traversal worklists
The previous code was storing the worklist in a vector, and then selectively
adding items to the start or end of the vector. That's a perfect use-case for a
double-ended queue.

This change also reveals that the existing code was a bit confused about which
end of the worklist is the front or back. For now, items are always removed
from the front of the queue (instead of the back), and code that adds items to
the queue has been flipped, to preserve the existing behaviour.
2023-10-12 21:41:13 +11:00
Zalathar
d1920c5181 coverage: Rename next_bcb to just bcb
This is the only BCB that `TraverseCoverageGraphWithLoops::next` works with, so
calling it `next_bcb` just makes the code less clear.
2023-10-12 21:41:13 +11:00
Zalathar
a7ae2a6e6c coverage: Simplify the detection of reloop edges to be given expressions 2023-10-12 21:41:13 +11:00
Matthias Krüger
f4de82c2b3
Rollup merge of #116589 - Zalathar:successors, r=oli-obk
coverage: Unbox and simplify `bcb_filtered_successors`

This is a small cleanup in the coverage instrumentor's graph-building code.

---
This function already has access to the MIR body, so instead of taking a reference to a terminator, it's simpler and easier to pass in a basic block index.

There is no need to box the returned iterator if we instead add appropriate lifetime captures, and make `short_circuit_preorder` generic over the type of iterator it expects.

We can also greatly simplify the function's implementation by observing that the only difference between its two cases is whether we take all of a BB's successors, or just the first one.

---

`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
2023-10-10 14:07:47 +02:00
Zalathar
5d629457fd coverage: Unbox and simplify bcb_filtered_successors
This function already has access to the MIR body, so instead of taking a
reference to a terminator, it's simpler and easier to pass in a basic block
index.

There is no need to box the returned iterator if we instead add appropriate
lifetime captures, since `short_circuit_preorder` is now generic over the type
of iterator it expects.

We can also greatly simplify the function's implementation by observing that
the only difference between its two cases is whether we take all of a BB's
successors, or just the first one.
2023-10-10 18:45:29 +11:00
Zalathar
f214497d22 coverage: Replace ShortCircuitPreorder with a single function
Instead of defining a named struct, we can use `std::iter::from_fn` and store
intermediate state in a closure.
2023-10-10 18:44:16 +11:00
Zalathar
6c44425e98 coverage: Remove enum CoverageStatement
This enum was mainly needed to track the precise origin of a span in MIR, for
debug printing purposes. Since the old debug code was removed in #115962, we
can replace it with just the span itself.
2023-10-10 13:39:23 +11:00
Zalathar
4b471df25d coverage: Disconnect span extraction from CoverageSpansGenerator
By performal initial span extraction in a separate free function, we can remove
some accidental complexity from the main generator code.
2023-10-10 13:39:23 +11:00
Zalathar
972ab8863d coverage: Move initial MIR span extraction into a submodule 2023-10-10 13:39:23 +11:00
Zalathar
053c4f94a0 coverage: Remove next_id methods from counter/expression IDs
When these methods were originally written, I wasn't aware that
`newtype_index!` already supports addition with ordinary numbers, without
needing to unwrap and re-wrap.
2023-10-03 13:03:40 +11:00
Zalathar
b1cf0c8f1b coverage: Remove code for making expression copies of BCB counters
Now that coverage statements can have multiple code regions attached to them,
this code is never used.
2023-10-03 13:03:39 +11:00
Zalathar
86a66c8171 coverage: Store each BCB's code regions in one coverage statement
If a BCB has more than one code region, those extra regions can now all be
stored in the same coverage statement, instead of being stored in additional
statements.
2023-10-03 13:03:39 +11:00
Zalathar
ee9d00f6b8 coverage: Let each coverage statement hold a vector of code regions
This makes it possible for a `StatementKind::Coverage` to hold more than one
code region, but that capability is not yet used.
2023-10-03 13:03:39 +11:00
Zalathar
1355e1fc74 coverage: Update comments/logs that referred to CoverageSpan
The concrete type `CoverageSpan` is no longer used outside of the `spans`
module.

This is a separate patch to avoid noise in the preceding patch that actually
encapsulates coverage spans.
2023-10-03 13:03:39 +11:00