Add some convenience helper methods on `hir::Safety`
Makes a lot of call sites simpler and should make any refactorings needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134090#issuecomment-2541332415 simpler, as fewer sites have to be touched in case we end up storing some information in the variants of `hir::Safety`
Various types can be used as method receivers, such as Rc<>, Box<> and
Arc<>. The arbitrary self types v2 work allows further types to be made
method receivers by implementing the Receiver trait.
With that in mind, it may come as a surprise to people when certain
common types do not implement Receiver and thus cannot be used as a
method receiver.
The RFC for arbitrary self types v2 therefore proposes emitting specific
lint hints for these cases:
* NonNull
* Weak
* Raw pointers
The code already emits a hint for this third case, in that it advises
folks that the `arbitrary_self_types_pointers` feature may meet their
need. This PR adds diagnostic hints for the Weak and NonNull cases.
The recently landed PR to adjust arbitrary self types was a bit
overenthusiastic, advising folks to use the new Receiver trait even
before it's been stabilized. Revert to the older wording of the lint in
such cases.
Arbitrary self types v2: main compiler changes
This is the main PR in a series of PRs related to Arbitrary Self Types v2, tracked in #44874. Specifically this is step 7 of the plan [described here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44874#issuecomment-2122179688), for [RFC 3519](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3519).
Overall this PR:
* Switches from the `Deref` trait to the new `Receiver` trait when the unstable `arbitrary_self_types` feature is enabled (the simple bit)
* Introduces new algorithms to spot "shadowing"; that is, the case where a newly-added method in an outer smart pointer might end up overriding a pre-existing method in the pointee (the complex bit). Most of this bit was explored in [this earlier perf-testing PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127812#issuecomment-2236911900).
* Lots of tests
This should not break compatibility for:
* Stable users, where it should have no effect
* Users of the existing `arbitrary_self_types` feature (because we implement `Receiver` for `T: Deref`) _unless_ those folks have added methods which may shadow methods in inner types, which we no longer want to allow
Subsequent PRs will add better diagnostics.
It's probably easiest to review this commit-by-commit.
r? `@wesleywiser`
In this new version of Arbitrary Self Types, we no longer use the Deref trait
exclusively when working out which self types are valid. Instead, we follow a
chain of Receiver traits. This enables methods to be called on smart pointer
types which fundamentally cannot support Deref (for instance because they are
wrappers for pointers that don't follow Rust's aliasing rules).
This includes:
* Changes to tests appropriately
* New tests for:
* The basics of the feature
* Ensuring lifetime elision works properly
* Generic Receivers
* A copy of the method subst test enhanced with Receiver
This is really the heart of the 'arbitrary self types v2' feature, and
is the most critical commit in the current PR.
Subsequent commits are focused on:
* Detecting "shadowing" problems, where a smart pointer type can hide
methods in the pointee.
* Diagnostics and cleanup.
Naming: in this commit, the "Autoderef" type is modified so that it no
longer solely focuses on the "Deref" trait, but can now consider the
"Receiver" trait instead. Should it be renamed, to something like
"TraitFollower"? This was considered, but rejected, because
* even in the Receiver case, it still considers built-in derefs
* the name Autoderef is short and snappy.
Approved in [ACP 491](https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/491).
Remove the `unsafe` on `core::intrinsics::breakpoint()`, since it's a
safe intrinsic to call and has no prerequisites.
(Thanks to @zachs18 for figuring out the `bootstrap`/`not(bootstrap)`
logic.)
Deeply normalize when computing implied outlives bounds
r? lcnr
Unfortunately resolving regions is still slightly scuffed (though in an unrelated way). Specifically, we should be normalizing our param-env outlives when constructing the `OutlivesEnv`; otherwise, these assumptions (dd2837ec5d/compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/outlives/env.rs (L78)) are not constructed correctly.
Let me know if you want us to track that somewhere.
Move `Const::{from_anon_const,try_from_lit}` to hir_ty_lowering
Fixes#128176.
This accomplishes one of the followup items from #131081.
These operations are much more about lowering the HIR than about
`Const`s themselves. They fit better in hir_ty_lowering with
`lower_const_arg` (formerly `Const::from_const_arg`) and the rest.
To accomplish this, `const_evaluatable_predicates_of` had to be changed
to not use `from_anon_const` anymore. Instead of visiting the HIR and
lowering anon consts on the fly, it now visits the `rustc_middle::ty`
data structures instead and directly looks for `UnevaluatedConst`s. This
approach was proposed in:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131081#discussion_r1821189257
r? `@BoxyUwU`
These operations are much more about lowering the HIR than about
`Const`s themselves. They fit better in hir_ty_lowering with
`lower_const_arg` (formerly `Const::from_const_arg`) and the rest.
To accomplish this, `const_evaluatable_predicates_of` had to be changed
to not use `from_anon_const` anymore. Instead of visiting the HIR and
lowering anon consts on the fly, it now visits the `rustc_middle::ty`
data structures instead and directly looks for `UnevaluatedConst`s. This
approach was proposed in:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131081#discussion_r1821189257
Actually use placeholder regions for trait method late bound regions in `collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys`
So in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113182, I introduced a "diagnostics improvement" in the form of 473c88dfb6, which changes which signature we end up instantiating with placeholder regions and which signature we end up instantiating with fresh region vars so that we have placeholders corresponding to the names of the late-bound regions coming from the *impl*.
However, this is not sound, since now we're essentially no longer proving that *all* instantiations of the trait method are compatible with an instantiation of the impl method, but vice versa (which is weaker). Let's look at the example `tests/ui/impl-trait/in-trait/do-not-imply-from-trait-impl.rs`:
```rust
trait MkStatic {
fn mk_static(self) -> &'static str;
}
impl MkStatic for &'static str {
fn mk_static(self) -> &'static str { self }
}
trait Foo {
fn foo<'a: 'static, 'late>(&'late self) -> impl MkStatic;
}
impl Foo for str {
fn foo<'a: 'static>(&'a self) -> impl MkStatic + 'static {
self
}
}
fn call_foo<T: Foo + ?Sized>(t: &T) -> &'static str {
t.foo().mk_static()
}
fn main() {
let s = call_foo(String::from("hello, world").as_str());
println!("> {s}");
}
```
To collect RPITITs, we were previously instantiating the trait signature with infer vars (`fn(&'?0 str) -> ?1t` where `?1t` is the variable we use to infer the RPITIT) and the impl signature with placeholders (there are no late-bound regions in that signature, so we just have `fn(&'a str) -> Opaque`).
Equating the signatures works, since all we do is unify `?1t` with `Opaque` and `'?0` with `'a`. However, conceptually it *shouldn't* hold, since this definition is not valid for *all* instantiations of the trait method but just the one where `'0` (i.e. `'late`) is equal to `'a` :(
## So what
This PR effectively reverts 473c88dfb6 to fix the unsoundness.
Fixes#133427
Also fixes#133425, which is actually coincidentally another instance of this bug (but not one that is weaponized into UB, just one that causes an ICE in refinement checking).
Refactor `where` predicates, and reserve for attributes support
Refactor `WherePredicate` to `WherePredicateKind`, and reserve for attributes support in `where` predicates.
This is a part of #115590 and is split from #132388.
r? petrochenkov
Support input/output in vector registers of s390x inline assembly (under asm_experimental_reg feature)
This extends currently clobber-only vector registers (`vreg`) support to allow passing `#[repr(simd)]` types, floats (f32/f64/f128), and integers (i32/i64/i128) as input/output.
This is unstable and gated under new `#![feature(asm_experimental_reg)]` (tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133416). If the feature is not enabled, only clober is supported as before.
| Architecture | Register class | Target feature | Allowed types |
| ------------ | -------------- | -------------- | -------------- |
| s390x | `vreg` | `vector` | `i32`, `f32`, `i64`, `f64`, `i128`, `f128`, `i8x16`, `i16x8`, `i32x4`, `i64x2`, `f32x4`, `f64x2` |
This matches the list of types that are supported by the vector registers in LLVM:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-19.1.0/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZRegisterInfo.td#L301-L313
In addition to `core::simd` types and floats listed above, custom `#[repr(simd)]` types of the same size and type are also allowed. All allowed types other than i32/f32/i64/f64/i128, and relevant target features are currently unstable.
Currently there is no SIMD type for s390x in `core::arch`, but this is tracked in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130869.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130869 about vector facility support in s390x
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125398 & https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116909 about f128 support in asm
`@rustbot` label +O-SystemZ +A-inline-assembly
take 2
open up coroutines
tweak the wordings
the lint works up until 2021
We were missing one case, for ADTs, which was
causing `Result` to yield incorrect results.
only include field spans with significant types
deduplicate and eliminate field spans
switch to emit spans to impl Drops
Co-authored-by: Niko Matsakis <nikomat@amazon.com>
collect drops instead of taking liveness diff
apply some suggestions and add explantory notes
small fix on the cache
let the query recurse through coroutine
new suggestion format with extracted variable name
fine-tune the drop span and messages
bugfix on runtime borrows
tweak message wording
filter out ecosystem types earlier
apply suggestions
clippy
check lint level at session level
further restrict applicability of the lint
translate bid into nop for stable mir
detect cycle in type structure
the behavior of the type system not only depends on the current
assumptions, but also the currentnphase of the compiler. This is
mostly necessary as we need to decide whether and how to reveal
opaque types. We track this via the `TypingMode`.
Check `use<..>` in RPITIT for refinement
`#![feature(precise_capturing_in_traits)]` allows users to write `+ use<>` bounds on RPITITs to control what lifetimes are captured by the RPITIT.
Since RPITITs currently also warn for refinement in implementations, this PR extends that refinement check for cases where we *undercapture* in an implementation, since that may be indirectly "promising" a more relaxed outlives bound than the impl author intended.
For an opaque to be refining, we need to capture *fewer* parameters than those mentioned in the captured params of the trait. For example:
```
trait TypeParam<T> {
fn test() -> impl Sized;
}
// Indirectly capturing a lifetime param through a type param substitution.
impl<'a> TypeParam<&'a ()> for i32 {
fn test() -> impl Sized + use<> {}
//~^ WARN impl trait in impl method captures fewer lifetimes than in trait
}
```
Since the opaque in the method (implicitly) captures `use<Self, T>`, and `Self = i32, T = &'a ()` in the impl, we must mention `'a` in our `use<..>` on the impl.
Tracking:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130044
Get rid of `check_opaque_type_well_formed`
Instead, replicate it by improving the span of the opaque in `check_opaque_meets_bounds`.
This has two consequences:
1. We now prefer "concrete type differs" errors, since we'll hit those first before we check the opaque is WF.
2. Spans have gotten slightly worse.
Specifically, (2.) could be improved by adding a new obligation cause that explains that the definition's environment has stronger assumptions than the declaration.
r? lcnr
