suggest removing type ascription in bad parsing position
Not sure how to test this with the non-nightly suggestion. Didn't add a new UI test because it already manifests in an existing UI test.
Fixes#95014
By putting them in `TtParser`, we can reuse them for every rule in a
macro. With that done, they can be `SmallVec` instead of `Vec`, and this
is a performance win because these vectors are hot and `SmallVec`
operations are a bit slower due to always needing an "inline or heap?"
check.
This type was a small performance win for `html5ever`, which uses a
macro with hundreds of very simple rules that don't contain any
metavariables. But this type is complicated (extra lifetimes) and
perf-neutral for macros that do have metavariables.
This commit removes `MatcherPosHandle`, simplifying things a lot. This
increases the allocation rate for `html5ever` and similar cases a bit,
but makes things easier for follow-up changes that will improve
performance more than what we lost here.
Give more details in `Display` for `hir::Target`
Made because I was making a code change and got a very confusing "should be applied to a method, not a method" error.
```
error[E0718]: `into_try_type` language item must be applied to a method
--> library\core\src\ops\try_trait.rs:352:32
|
352 | #[cfg_attr(not(bootstrap), lang = "into_try_type")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ attribute should be applied to a method, not a method
```
With this change the error is more actionable
```
error[E0718]: `into_try_type` language item must be applied to a required trait method
--> library\core\src\ops\try_trait.rs:352:32
|
352 | #[cfg_attr(not(bootstrap), lang = "into_try_type")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ attribute should be applied to a required trait method, not a provided trait method
```
Made because I was making a code change and got a very confusing "should be applied to a method, not a method" error.
```
error[E0718]: `into_try_type` language item must be applied to a method
--> library\core\src\ops\try_trait.rs:352:32
|
352 | #[cfg_attr(not(bootstrap), lang = "into_try_type")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ attribute should be applied to a method, not a method
```
Always evaluate all cfg predicate in all() and any()
This pull-request adjust the handling of the `all()` and `any()` to always evaluate every cfg predicate because not doing so result in accepting incorrect `cfg`:
```rust
#[cfg(any(unix, foo::bar))] // Should error on foo::bar, but does not on unix platform (but does on non unix platform)
fn foo1() {}
#[cfg(all(foo, foo::bar))] // Should error on foo::bar, but does not
fn foo2() {}
#[cfg(all(foo::bar, foo))] // Correctly error on foo::bar
fn foo3() {}
#[cfg(any(foo::bar, foo))] // Correctly error on foo::bar
fn foo4() {}
```
This pull-request take the side to directly turn it into a hard error instead of having a future incompatibility lint because the combination to get this incorrect behavior is unusual and highly probable that some code have this without noticing.
A [search](https://cs.github.com/?scopeName=All+repos&scope=&q=lang%3Arust+%2Fany%5C%28%5Ba-zA-Z%5D%2C+%5Ba-zA-Z%5D%2B%3A%3A%5Ba-zA-Z%5D%2B%2F) on Github reveal no such instance nevertheless a Crater run should probably be done before merging this.
This was discover in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94175 when trying to lint on the second predicate. Also note that this seems to have being introduce with Rust 1.27.0: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/KnfqKv15f.
r? `@petrochenkov`
It currently has no state, just the three methods `parse_tt`,
`parse_tt_inner`, and `bb_items_ambiguity_error`.
This commit is large but trivial, and mostly consists of changes to the
indentation of those methods. Subsequent commits will do more.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95013 (Update browser-ui-test version to 0.8.2)
- #95039 (Make negative coherence work when there's impl negative on super predicates)
- #95047 (Refactor: remove an unnecessary pattern for ignoring all parts)
- #95048 (update Miri)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
