The OS version depends on the deployment target environment variables,
the access of which we want to move to later in the compilation pipeline
that has access to more information, for example `env_depinfo`.
Apple: Do not specify an SDK version in `rlib` object files
This was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114114, but is unnecessary, since it ends up being overwritten when linking anyhow, and it feels wrong to embed some arbitrary SDK version in here. The object files produced by LLVM also do not set this, and the tooling shows `n/a` when it's `0`, so it seems to genuinely be optional in object files.
I've also added a test for the different places the SDK version shows up, and documented a bit more in the code how SDK versions work.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129432 for the bigger picture.
Tested with (excludes the same few targets as in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130435):
```console
./x test tests/run-make/apple-sdk-version --target aarch64-apple-darwin,aarch64-apple-ios,aarch64-apple-ios-macabi,aarch64-apple-ios-sim,aarch64-apple-tvos,aarch64-apple-tvos-sim,aarch64-apple-visionos,aarch64-apple-visionos-sim,aarch64-apple-watchos,aarch64-apple-watchos-sim,arm64_32-apple-watchos,armv7k-apple-watchos,armv7s-apple-ios,x86_64-apple-darwin,x86_64-apple-ios,x86_64-apple-ios-macabi,x86_64-apple-tvos,x86_64-apple-watchos-sim,x86_64h-apple-darwin
IPHONEOS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.0 ./x test tests/run-make/apple-sdk-version --target=i386-apple-ios
```
CC `@BlackHoleFox,` you [originally commented on these values](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114114#discussion_r1300599445).
`@rustbot` label O-apple
Simplify some nested `if` statements
Applies some but not all instances of `clippy::collapsible_if`. Some ended up looking worse afterwards, though, so I left those out. Also applies instances of `clippy::collapsible_else_if`
Review with whitespace disabled please.
rustc: Simplify getting sysroot library directory
It was very non-obvious that `sess.target_tlib_path`, `make_target_lib_path(...)`, and `sess.target_filesearch(...).search_paths()` result in the same sysroot library directory paths.
They are however, indeed the same, because `sess.target_tlib_path` is initialized to `make_target_lib_path(...)` on `Session` creation, and they are used interchangeably.
There are still some redundant calls to `make_target_lib_path` and other inconsistent ways to obtain sysroot directories, but fixing that requires some behavior changes, while this PR is a pure refactoring.
Some places in the compiler even disagree on the number of sysroots - 1 (explicit `--sysroot` *or* default sysroot), 2 (explicit `--sysroot` *and* default sysroot), or an unclear number of `sysroot_candidates` every of which is considered.
The logic currently using `sess.target_tlib_path` or equivalents assumes one sysroot.
Make create_dll_import_lib easier to implement
This will make it easier to implement raw-dylib support in cg_clif and cg_gcc. This PR doesn't yet include an create_dll_import_lib implementation for cg_clif as I need to correctly implement dllimport in cg_clif first before raw-dylib can work at all with cg_clif.
Required for https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift/issues/1345
When an archive fails to build, print the path
Currently the output on failure is as follows:
Compiling block-buffer v0.10.4
Compiling crypto-common v0.1.6
Compiling digest v0.10.7
Compiling sha2 v0.10.8
Compiling xz2 v0.1.7
error: failed to build archive: No such file or directory
error: could not compile `bootstrap` (lib) due to 1 previous error
Change this to print which file is being constructed, to give some hint about what is going on.
error: failed to build archive at `path/to/output`: No such file or directory
Clean up a few minor refs in `format!` macro, as it has a performance cost. Apparently the compiler is unable to inline `format!("{}", &variable)`, and does a run-time double-reference instead (format macro already does one level referencing). Inlining format args prevents accidental `&` misuse.
Currently the output on failure is as follows:
Compiling block-buffer v0.10.4
Compiling crypto-common v0.1.6
Compiling digest v0.10.7
Compiling sha2 v0.10.8
Compiling xz2 v0.1.7
error: failed to build archive: No such file or directory
error: could not compile `bootstrap` (lib) due to 1 previous error
Print which file is being constructed to give some hint about what is
going on.
De-duplicate all consecutive native libs regardless of their options
Address https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126913#issuecomment-2188184011 by no longer de-duplicating based on the "options" but by only looking at the generated link args, as to avoid consecutive libs that originated from different native-lib with different options (like `raw-dylib` on Windows) but isn't relevant for `--print=native-static-libs`.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #125263 (rust-lld: fallback to rustc's sysroot if there's no path to the linker in the target sysroot)
- #125345 (rustc_codegen_llvm: add support for writing summary bitcode)
- #125362 (Actually use TAIT instead of emulating it)
- #125412 (Don't suggest adding the unexpected cfgs to the build-script it-self)
- #125445 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-with-short-out-dir-option` to `rmake.rs`)
- #125452 (Cleanup check-cfg handling in core and std)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-lld: fallback to rustc's sysroot if there's no path to the linker in the target sysroot
As seen in #125246, some sysroots don't expect to contain `rust-lld` and want to keep it that way, so we fallback to the default rustc sysroot if there is no path to the linker in any of the sysroot tools search paths. This is how we locate codegen-backends' dylibs already.
People also have requested an error if none of these search paths contain the self-contained linker directory, so there's also an error in that case.
r? `@petrochenkov` cc `@ehuss` `@RalfJung`
I'm not sure where we check for `rust-lld`'s existence on the targets where we use it by default, and if we just ignore it when missing or emit a warning (as I assume we don't emit an error), so I just checked for the existence of `gcc-ld`, where `cc` will look for the lld-wrapper binaries.
<sub>*Feel free to point out better ways to do this, it's the middle of the night here.*</sub>
Fixes#125246
Remove more `#[macro_use] extern crate tracing`
Because explicit importing of macros via use items is nicer (more standard and readable) than implicit importing via `#[macro_use]`. Continuing the work from #124511 and #124914.
r? `@jackh726`
Relax restrictions on multiple sanitizers
Most combinations of LLVM sanitizers are legal-enough to enable simultaneously. This change will allow simultaneously enabling ASAN and shadow call stacks on supported platforms.
I used this python script to generate the mutually-exclusive sanitizer combinations:
```python
#!/usr/bin/python3
import subprocess
flags = [
["-fsanitize=address"],
["-fsanitize=leak"],
["-fsanitize=memory"],
["-fsanitize=thread"],
["-fsanitize=hwaddress"],
["-fsanitize=cfi", "-flto", "-fvisibility=hidden"],
["-fsanitize=memtag", "--target=aarch64-linux-android", "-march=armv8a+memtag"],
["-fsanitize=shadow-call-stack"],
["-fsanitize=kcfi", "-flto", "-fvisibility=hidden"],
["-fsanitize=kernel-address"],
["-fsanitize=safe-stack"],
["-fsanitize=dataflow"],
]
for i in range(len(flags)):
for j in range(i):
command = ["clang++"] + flags[i] + flags[j] + ["-o", "main.o", "-c", "main.cpp"]
completed = subprocess.run(command, stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL)
if completed.returncode != 0:
first = flags[i][0][11:].replace('-', '').upper()
second = flags[j][0][11:].replace('-', '').upper()
print(f"(SanitizerSet::{first}, SanitizerSet::{second}),")
```
This argument isn't necessary for WebAssembly targets since `wasm-ld` is
the only linker for the targets. Passing it otherwise interferes with
Clang's linker selection on `wasm32-wasip2` so avoid it altogether.
