During the RFC, it was discussed that figuring out whether a range is empty was subtle, and thus there should be a clear and obvious way to do it. It can't just be ExactSizeIterator::is_empty (also unstable) because not all ranges are ExactSize -- not even Range<i32> or RangeInclusive<usize>.
Add ..= to the parser
Add ..= to libproc_macro
Add ..= to ICH
Highlight ..= in rustdoc
Update impl Debug for RangeInclusive to ..=
Replace `...` to `..=` in range docs
Make the dotdoteq warning point to the ...
Add warning for ... in expressions
Updated more tests to the ..= syntax
Updated even more tests to the ..= syntax
Updated the inclusive_range entry in unstable book
* fixed link typos and copy-paster errors
* rewrote Fn* explanations
* `RHS = Self` -> `RHS` is `Self` (added that to all applicable places as
well)
* fixed up some links
* s/MutDeref/DerefMut
* removed remaining superfluous `fn main()`s
* fixed some minor phrasings and factual errors and inaccuracies
std::ops docs: Fix phrasing and factual errors/inaccuracies
Part of #29365.
* Strenghtened summary/explanation split, making phrasings more parallel
* Added links throughout
* Fixed some example formatting & removed extraneous `fn main()`s (or hid
then when needed because of `#![features]`.
* Emphasized note on `RangeFrom`'s `Iterator` implementation
* Added summary sentences to (unstable) `contains` methods
Replaced by adding extra imports, adding hidden code (`# ...`), modifying
examples to be runnable (sorry Homura), specifying non-Rust code, and
converting to should_panic, no_run, or compile_fail.
Remaining "```ignore"s received an explanation why they are being ignored.
