When constant evaluation fails because its MIR is tainted by errors,
suppress note indicating that erroneous constant was used, since those
errors have to be fixed regardless of the constant being used or not.
...and remove it from `PointeeInfo`, which isn't meant for this.
There are still various places (marked with FIXMEs) that assume all pointers
have the same size and alignment. Fixing this requires parsing non-default
address spaces in the data layout string, which will be done in a followup.
Ensure param-env is const before calling `eval_to_valtree`
Other queries call `ParamEnv::with_const` *inside* of the query itself (e.g. `const_eval_global_id_for_typeck`), so this could alternatively be moved into the provider of `eval_to_valtree` instead. I don't have a particularly strong opinion, though *theoretically* caching is better if we make the query keys more constrained.
I'm not exactly sure how this is an effect of the `-Zmir-opt-level=3` flag. Maybe something about the inliner causes us to inline an unevaluated const into a body where it can be evaluated, but where it has not yet been normalized.
This seems likely, since we're inlining `from_fn_1::<{ N / 2 }, _>` in `from_fn_2`, which means that we will need to evaluate that constant during the const prop pass after inlining.
Fixes#104396
Initial pass at expr/abstract const/s
Address comments
Switch to using a list instead of &[ty::Const], rm `AbstractConst`
Remove try_unify_abstract_consts
Update comments
Add edits
Recurse more
More edits
Prevent equating associated consts
Move failing test to ui
Changes this test from incremental to ui, and mark it as failing and a known bug.
Does not cause the compiler to ICE, so should be ok.
interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information
Next step in the reaction to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99923. Also teaches Miri to implicitly strip provenance in more situations when transmuting pointers to integers, which fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2456.
Pointer-to-int transmutation during CTFE now produces a message like this:
```
= help: this code performed an operation that depends on the underlying bytes representing a pointer
= help: the absolute address of a pointer is not known at compile-time, so such operations are not supported
```
r? ``@oli-obk``
