The idea is to identify cases of symbols/identifiers that are not
expected to be used. There isn't a perfectly sharp line between "dummy"
and "not dummy", but I think it's useful nonetheless.
Add `#[define_opaques]` attribute and require it for all type-alias-impl-trait sites that register a hidden type
Instead of relying on the signature of items to decide whether they are constraining an opaque type, the opaque types that the item constrains must be explicitly listed.
A previous version of this PR used an actual attribute, but had to keep the resolved `DefId`s in a side table.
Now we just lower to fields in the AST that have no surface syntax, instead a builtin attribute macro fills in those fields where applicable.
Note that for convenience referencing opaque types in associated types from associated methods on the same impl will not require an attribute. If that causes problems `#[defines()]` can be used to overwrite the default of searching for opaques in the signature.
One wart of this design is that closures and static items do not have generics. So since I stored the opaques in the generics of functions, consts and methods, I would need to add a custom field to closures and statics to track this information. During a T-types discussion we decided to just not do this for now.
fixes#131298
Revert <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138084> to buy time to
consider options that avoids breaking downstream usages of cargo on
distributed `rustc-src` artifacts, where such cargo invocations fail due
to inability to inherit `lints` from workspace root manifest's
`workspace.lints` (this is only valid for the source rust-lang/rust
workspace, but not really the distributed `rustc-src` artifacts).
This breakage was reported in
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138304>.
This reverts commit 48caf81484, reversing
changes made to c6662879b2.
compiler: Use `size_of` from the prelude instead of imported
Use `std::mem::{size_of, size_of_val, align_of, align_of_val}` from the prelude instead of importing or qualifying them. Apply this change across the compiler.
These functions were added to all preludes in Rust 1.80.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
By naming them in `[workspace.lints.rust]` in the top-level
`Cargo.toml`, and then making all `compiler/` crates inherit them with
`[lints] workspace = true`. (I omitted `rustc_codegen_{cranelift,gcc}`,
because they're a bit different.)
The advantages of this over the current approach:
- It uses a standard Cargo feature, rather than special handling in
bootstrap. So, easier to understand, and less likely to get
accidentally broken in the future.
- It works for proc macro crates.
It's a shame it doesn't work for rustc-specific lints, as the comments
explain.
Use `std::mem::{size_of, size_of_val, align_of, align_of_val}` from the
prelude instead of importing or qualifying them.
These functions were added to all preludes in Rust 1.80.
Provide more context on resolve error caused from incorrect RTN
When encountering a resolve E0575 error for an associated method (when a type was expected), see if it could have been an intended return type notation bound.
```
error[E0575]: expected associated type, found associated function `Trait::method`
--> $DIR/bad-inputs-and-output.rs:31:36
|
LL | fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where <T as Trait>::method(i32): Send {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not a associated type
|
help: you might have meant to use the return type notation syntax
|
LL - fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where <T as Trait>::method(i32): Send {}
LL + fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where T::method(..): Send {}
|
```
Built on top of #137824, only second commit is relevant for review.
r? ````````@compiler-errors````````
Try to point of macro expansion from resolver and method errors if it involves macro var
In the case that a macro caller passes an identifier into a macro generating a path or method expression, point out that identifier in the context of the *macro* so it's a bit more clear how the macro is involved in causing the error.
r? ``````````@estebank`````````` or reassign
Allow struct field default values to reference struct's generics
Right now, the default field value feature (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132162) lowers anon consts whose types may reference ADT params that the const doesn't inherit.
This PR fixes this, so that these defaults can reference ADTs' generics, and sets the `generics_of` parenting up correctly.
There doesn't seem to be a good reason not to support this, since the anon const has a well-defined type from the field, and the anon const doesn't interact with the type system like generic parameter defaults do.
r? `````@boxyuwu````` or reassign
I could also make this into an error if this seems problematic (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...compiler-errors:rust:default-field-value-implicit-param?expand=1)...... but I'd rather make this work and register an open question on the tracking issue about validating that this is well-vetted.
Fixes#137896
Do not recover missing lifetime with random in-scope lifetime
Suppresses a ton of stray errors, since this recovery doesn't really make sense anymore now that we have a dedicated `ReError` kind.
r? oli-obk or reassign
When `#![feature(min_generic_const_args)]` is enabled, we now lower all
const paths in generic arg position to `hir::ConstArgKind::Path`. We
then lower assoc const paths to `ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated` since we
can no longer use the anon const expression lowering machinery. In the
process of implementing this, I factored out `hir_ty_lowering` code that
is now shared between lowering assoc types and assoc consts.
This PR also introduces a `#[type_const]` attribute for trait assoc
consts that are allowed as const args. However, we still need to
implement code to check that assoc const definitions satisfy
`#[type_const]` if present (basically is it a const path or a
monomorphic anon const).
When encountering a resolve E0575 error for an associated method (when a type was expected), see if it could have been an intended return type notation bound.
```
error[E0575]: expected associated type, found associated function `Trait::method`
--> $DIR/bad-inputs-and-output.rs:31:36
|
LL | fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where <T as Trait>::method(i32): Send {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not a associated type
|
help: you might have meant to use the return type notation syntax
|
LL - fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where <T as Trait>::method(i32): Send {}
LL + fn foo_qualified<T: Trait>() where T::method(..): Send {}
|
```
Implement `#[cfg]` in `where` clauses
This PR implements #115590, which supports `#[cfg]` attributes in `where` clauses.
The biggest change is, that it adds `AttrsVec` and `NodeId` to the `ast::WherePredicate` and `HirId` to the `hir::WherePredicate`.
Introduce `feature(generic_const_parameter_types)`
Allows to define const generic parameters whose type depends on other generic parameters, e.g. `Foo<const N: usize, const ARR: [u8; N]>;`
Wasn't going to implement for this for a while until we could implement it with `bad_inference.rs` resolved but apparently the project simd folks would like to be able to use this for some intrinsics and the inference issue isn't really a huge problem there aiui. (cc ``@workingjubilee`` )
Handle asm const similar to inline const
Previously, asm consts are handled similar to anon consts rather than inline consts. Anon consts are not good at dealing with lifetimes, because `type_of` has lifetimes erased already. Inline consts can deal with lifetimes because they live in an outer typeck context. And since `global_asm!` lacks an outer typeck context, we have implemented asm consts with anon consts while they're in fact more similar to inline consts.
This was changed in #137180, and this means that handling asm consts as inline consts are possible. While as `@compiler-errors` pointed out, `const` currently can't be used with any types with lifetime, this is about to change if #128464 is implemented. This PR is a preparatory PR for that feature.
As an unintentional side effect, fix#117877.
cc `@Amanieu`
r? `@compiler-errors`
Teach structured errors to display short `Ty<'_>`
Make it so that in every structured error annotated with `#[derive(Diagnostic)]` that has a field of type `Ty<'_>`, the printing of that value into a `String` will look at the thread-local storage `TyCtxt` in order to shorten to a length appropriate with the terminal width. When this happen, the resulting error will have a note with the file where the full type name was written to.
```
error[E0618]: expected function, found `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)``
--> long.rs:7:5
|
6 | fn foo(x: D) { //~ `x` has type `(...
| - `x` has type `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)`
7 | x(); //~ ERROR expected function, found `(...
| ^--
| |
| call expression requires function
|
= note: the full name for the type has been written to 'long.long-type-14182675702747116984.txt'
= note: consider using `--verbose` to print the full type name to the console
```
Follow up to and response to the comments on #136898.
r? ``@oli-obk``
Make it so that every structured error annotated with `#[derive(Diagnostic)]` that has a field of type `Ty<'_>`, the printing of that value into a `String` will look at the thread-local storage `TyCtxt` in order to shorten to a length appropriate with the terminal width. When this happen, the resulting error will have a note with the file where the full type name was written to.
```
error[E0618]: expected function, found `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)``
--> long.rs:7:5
|
6 | fn foo(x: D) { //~ `x` has type `(...
| - `x` has type `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)`
7 | x(); //~ ERROR expected function, found `(...
| ^--
| |
| call expression requires function
|
= note: the full name for the type has been written to 'long.long-type-14182675702747116984.txt'
= note: consider using `--verbose` to print the full type name to the console
```
Specify scope in `out_of_scope_macro_calls` lint
```
warning: cannot find macro `in_root` in the crate root
--> $DIR/key-value-expansion-scope.rs:1:10
|
LL | #![doc = in_root!()]
| ^^^^^^^ not found in the crate root
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #124535 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124535>
= help: import `macro_rules` with `use` to make it callable above its definition
= note: `#[warn(out_of_scope_macro_calls)]` on by default
```
r? ```@petrochenkov```
Suggest replacing `.` with `::` in more error diagnostics.
First commit makes the existing "help: use the path separator to refer to an item" also work when the base is a type alias, not just a trait/module/struct.
The existing unconditional `DefKind::Mod | DefKind::Trait` match arm is changed to a conditional `DefKind::Mod | DefKind::Trait | DefKind::TyAlias` arm that only matches if the `path_sep` suggestion-adding closure succeeds, so as not to stop the later `DefKind::TyAlias`-specific suggestions if the path-sep suggestion does not apply. This shouldn't change behavior for `Mod` or `Trait` (due to the default arm's `return false` etc).
This commit also updates `tests/ui/resolve/issue-22692.rs` to reflect this, and also renames it to something more meaningful.
This commit also makes the `bad_struct_syntax_suggestion` closure take `err` as a parameter instead of capturing it, since otherwise caused borrowing errors due to the change to using `path_sep` in a pattern guard.
<details> <summary> Type alias diagnostic example </summary>
```rust
type S = String;
fn main() {
let _ = S.new;
}
```
```diff
error[E0423]: expected value, found type alias `S`
--> diag7.rs:4:13
|
4 | let _ = S.new;
| ^
|
- = note: can't use a type alias as a constructor
+ help: use the path separator to refer to an item
+ |
+4 | let _ = S::new;
+ | ~~
```
</details>
Second commit adds some cases for `enum`s, where if there is a field/method expression where the field/method has the name of a unit/tuple variant, we assume the user intended to create that variant[^1] and suggest replacing the `.` from the field/method suggestion with a `::` path separator. If no such variant is found (or if the error is not a field/method expression), we give the existing suggestion that suggests adding `::TupleVariant(/* fields */)` after the enum.
<details> <summary> Enum diagnostic example </summary>
```rust
enum Foo {
A(u32),
B,
C { x: u32 },
}
fn main() {
let _ = Foo.A(42); // changed
let _ = Foo.B; // changed
let _ = Foo.D(42); // no change
let _ = Foo.D; // no change
let _ = Foo(42); // no change
}
```
```diff
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:8:13
|
8 | let _ = Foo.A(42); // changed
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
-help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
- |
-8 | let _ = Foo::B.A(42); // changed
- | ~~~~~~
-help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
+help: use the path separator to refer to a variant
|
-8 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).A(42); // changed
- | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+8 | let _ = Foo::A(42); // changed
+ | ~~
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:9:13
|
9 | let _ = Foo.B; // changed
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
-help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
- |
-9 | let _ = Foo::B.B; // changed
- | ~~~~~~
-help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
+help: use the path separator to refer to a variant
|
-9 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).B; // changed
- | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+9 | let _ = Foo::B; // changed
+ | ~~
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:10:13
|
10 | let _ = Foo.D(42); // no change
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
|
10 | let _ = Foo::B.D(42); // no change
| ~~~~~~
help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
|
10 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).D(42); // no change
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
error[E0423]: expected value, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:11:13
|
11 | let _ = Foo.D; // no change
| ^^^
|
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
help: you might have meant to use the following enum variant
|
11 | let _ = Foo::B.D; // no change
| ~~~~~~
help: alternatively, the following enum variant is available
|
11 | let _ = (Foo::A(/* fields */)).D; // no change
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
error[E0423]: expected function, tuple struct or tuple variant, found enum `Foo`
--> diag8.rs:12:13
|
12 | let _ = Foo(42); // no change
| ^^^ help: try to construct one of the enum's variants: `Foo::A`
|
= help: you might have meant to construct the enum's non-tuple variant
note: the enum is defined here
--> diag8.rs:1:1
|
1 | / enum Foo {
2 | | A(u32),
3 | | B,
4 | | C { x: u32 },
5 | | }
| |_^
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
```
</details>
[^1]: or if it's a field expression and a tuple variant, that they meant to refer the variant constructor.
