Make our `DIFlags` match `LLVMDIFlags` in the LLVM-C API
In order to be able to use a mixture of LLVM-C and C++ bindings for debuginfo, our Rust-side `DIFlags` needs to have the same layout as LLVM-C's `LLVMDIFlags`, and we also need to be able to convert it to the `DIFlags` accepted by LLVM's C++ API.
Internally, LLVM converts between the two types with a simple cast. We can't necessarily rely on that always being true, and LLVM doesn't expose a conversion function, so we have two potential options:
- Convert each bit/subvalue individually
- Statically assert that doing a cast is actually fine
As long as both types do remain the same under the hood (which seems likely), the static-assert-and-cast approach is easier and faster. If the static assertions ever start failing against some future version of LLVM, we'll have to switch over to the convert-each-subvalue approach, which is a bit more error-prone.
---
Extracted from #134009, though this PR ended up choosing the static-assert-and-cast approach over the convert-each-subvalue approach.
remove support for the (unstable) #[start] attribute
As explained by `@Noratrieb:`
`#[start]` should be deleted. It's nothing but an accidentally leaked implementation detail that's a not very useful mix between "portable" entrypoint logic and bad abstraction.
I think the way the stable user-facing entrypoint should work (and works today on stable) is pretty simple:
- `std`-using cross-platform programs should use `fn main()`. the compiler, together with `std`, will then ensure that code ends up at `main` (by having a platform-specific entrypoint that gets directed through `lang_start` in `std` to `main` - but that's just an implementation detail)
- `no_std` platform-specific programs should use `#![no_main]` and define their own platform-specific entrypoint symbol with `#[no_mangle]`, like `main`, `_start`, `WinMain` or `my_embedded_platform_wants_to_start_here`. most of them only support a single platform anyways, and need cfg for the different platform's ways of passing arguments or other things *anyways*
`#[start]` is in a super weird position of being neither of those two. It tries to pretend that it's cross-platform, but its signature is a total lie. Those arguments are just stubbed out to zero on ~~Windows~~ wasm, for example. It also only handles the platform-specific entrypoints for a few platforms that are supported by `std`, like Windows or Unix-likes. `my_embedded_platform_wants_to_start_here` can't use it, and neither could a libc-less Linux program.
So we have an attribute that only works in some cases anyways, that has a signature that's a total lie (and a signature that, as I might want to add, has changed recently, and that I definitely would not be comfortable giving *any* stability guarantees on), and where there's a pretty easy way to get things working without it in the first place.
Note that this feature has **not** been RFCed in the first place.
*This comment was posted [in May](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29633#issuecomment-2088596042) and so far nobody spoke up in that issue with a usecase that would require keeping the attribute.*
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29633
try-job: x86_64-gnu-nopt
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: x86_64-msvc-2
try-job: test-various
When LLVM's location discriminator value limit is exceeded, emit locations with dummy spans instead of dropping them entirely
Dropping them fails `-Zverify-llvm-ir`.
Fixes#135332.
r? `@jieyouxu`
Revert most of #133194 (except the test and the comment fixes). Then refix
not emitting locations at all when the correct location discriminator value
exceeds LLVM's capacity.
Add gpu-kernel calling convention
The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit f6b21e90d1 (#120495 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/16463) due to inactivity in the amdgpu target.
Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to `ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust compiles for.
Tracking issue: #135467
amdgpu target tracking issue: #135024
The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit
f6b21e90d1 due to inactivity in the amdgpu
target.
Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to
`ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust
compiles for.
Rename `BitSet` to `DenseBitSet`
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum` as you requested this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134438#discussion_r1890659739 after such a confusion.
This PR renames `BitSet` to `DenseBitSet` to make it less obvious as the go-to solution for bitmap needs, as well as make its representation (and positives/negatives) clearer. It also expands the comments there to hopefully make it clearer when it's not a good fit, with some alternative bitsets types.
(This migrates the subtrees cg_gcc and clippy to use the new name in separate commits, for easier review by their respective owners, but they can obvs be squashed)
add `-Zmin-function-alignment`
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232
This PR adds the `-Zmin-function-alignment=<align>` flag, that specifies a minimum alignment for all* functions.
### Motivation
This feature is requested by RfL [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128830):
> i.e. the equivalents of `-fmin-function-alignment` ([GCC](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-fmin-function-alignment_003dn), Clang does not support it) / `-falign-functions` ([GCC](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-falign-functions), [Clang](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.html#cmdoption-clang1-falign-functions)).
>
> For the Linux kernel, the behavior wanted is that of GCC's `-fmin-function-alignment` and Clang's `-falign-functions`, i.e. align all functions, including cold functions.
>
> There is [`feature(fn_align)`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232), but we need to do it globally.
### Behavior
The `fn_align` feature does not have an RFC. It was decided at the time that it would not be necessary, but maybe we feel differently about that now? In any case, here are the semantics of this flag:
- `-Zmin-function-alignment=<align>` specifies the minimum alignment of all* functions
- the `#[repr(align(<align>))]` attribute can be used to override the function alignment on a per-function basis: when `-Zmin-function-alignment` is specified, the attribute's value is only used when it is higher than the value passed to `-Zmin-function-alignment`.
- the target may decide to use a higher value (e.g. on x86_64 the minimum that LLVM generates is 16)
- The highest supported alignment in rust is `2^29`: I checked a bunch of targets, and they all emit the `.p2align 29` directive for targets that align functions at all (some GPU stuff does not have function alignment).
*: Only with `build-std` would the minimum alignment also be applied to `std` functions.
---
cc `@ojeda`
r? `@workingjubilee` you were active on the tracking issue
Adds `#[rustc_force_inline]` which is similar to always inlining but
reports an error if the inlining was not possible, and which always
attempts to inline annotated items, regardless of optimisation levels.
It can only be applied to free functions to guarantee that the MIR
inliner will be able to resolve calls.
llvm: Ignore error value that is always false
See llvm/llvm-project#121851
For LLVM 20+, this function (`renameModuleForThinLTO`) has no return value. For prior versions of LLVM, this never failed, but had a signature which allowed an error value people were handling.
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
r? `@nikic`
Wait a moment before approving while the llvm-main infrastructure picks it up.
Add support for wasm exception handling to Emscripten target
This is a draft because we need some additional setting for the Emscripten target to select between the old exception handling and the new exception handling. I don't know how to add a setting like that, would appreciate advice from Rust folks. We could maybe choose to use the new exception handling if `Ctarget-feature=+exception-handling` is passed? I tried this but I get errors from llvm so I'm not doing it right.
See llvm/llvm-project#121851
For LLVM 20+, this function (`renameModuleForThinLTO`) has no return
value. For prior versions of LLVM, this never failed, but had a
signature which allowed an error value people were handling.
Add a notion of "some ABIs require certain target features"
I think I finally found the right shape for the data and checks that I recently added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133099, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133417, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134337: we have a notion of "this ABI requires the following list of target features, and it is incompatible with the following list of target features". Both `-Ctarget-feature` and `#[target_feature]` are updated to ensure we follow the rules of the ABI. This removes all the "toggleability" stuff introduced before, though we do keep the notion of a fully "forbidden" target feature -- this is needed to deal with target features that are actual ABI switches, and hence are needed to even compute the list of required target features.
We always explicitly (un)set all required and in-conflict features, just to avoid potential trouble caused by the default features of whatever the base CPU is. We do this *before* applying `-Ctarget-feature` to maintain backward compatibility; this poses a slight risk of missing some implicit feature dependencies in LLVM but has the advantage of not breaking users that deliberately toggle ABI-relevant target features. They get a warning but the feature does get toggled the way they requested.
For now, our logic supports x86, ARM, and RISC-V (just like the previous logic did). Unsurprisingly, RISC-V is the nicest. ;)
As a side-effect this also (unstably) allows *enabling* `x87` when that is harmless. I used the opportunity to mark SSE2 as required on x86-64, to better match the actual logic in LLVM and because all x86-64 chips do have SSE2. This infrastructure also prepares us for requiring SSE on x86-32 when we want to use that for our ABI (and for float semantics sanity), see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133611, but no such change is happening in this PR.
r? `@workingjubilee`
[Debuginfo] Force enum `DISCR_*` to `static const u64` to allow for inspection via LLDB
see [here](486614878) for more info.
This change mainly helps `*-msvc` debugged with LLDB. Currently, LLDB cannot inspect `static` struct fields, so the intended visualization for enums is only borderline functional, and niche enums with ranges of discriminant cannot be determined at all .
LLDB *can* inspect `static const` values (though for whatever reason, non-enum/non-u64 consts don't work).
This change adds the `LLVMRustDIBuilderCreateQualifiedType` to the rust FFI layer to wrap the discr type with a `const` modifier, as well as forcing all generated integer enum `DISCR_*` values to be u64's. Those values will only ever be used by debugger visualizers anyway, so it shouldn't be a huge deal, but I left a fixme comment for it just in case.. The `tag` also still properly reflects the discriminant type, so no information is lost.
Range metadata was disabled for amdgpu due to a backend bug. I did not
encounter any problems when removing the workaround to enable range
metadata (tried compiling `core` and `alloc`), so I assume this has
been fixed in LLVM in the last years.
Remove the workaround to re-enable range metadata.
coverage: Store coverage source regions as `Span` until codegen (take 2)
This is an attempt to re-land #133418:
> Historically, coverage spans were converted into line/column coordinates during the MIR instrumentation pass.
> This PR moves that conversion step into codegen, so that coverage spans spend most of their time stored as Span instead.
> In addition to being conceptually nicer, this also reduces the size of coverage mappings in MIR, because Span is smaller than 4x u32.
That PR was reverted by #133608, because in some circumstances not covered by our test suite we were emitting coverage metadata that was causing `llvm-cov` to exit with an error (#133606).
---
The implementation here is *mostly* the same, but adapted for subsequent changes in the relevant code (e.g. #134163).
I believe that the changes in #134163 should be sufficient to prevent the problem that required the original PR to be reverted. But I haven't been able to reproduce the original breakage in a regression test, and the `llvm-cov` error message is extremely unhelpful, so I can't completely rule out the possibility of this breaking again.
r? jieyouxu (reviewer of the original PR)
In codegen, a used function with `FunctionCoverageInfo` but no mappings has
historically indicated a bug. However, that will no longer be the case after
moving some fallible span-processing steps into codegen.
