don't succeed `evaluate_obligation` query if new opaque types were registered
fixes#98608fixes#98604
The root cause of all this is that in type flag computation we entirely ignore nongeneric things like struct fields and the signature of function items. So if a flag had to be set for a struct if it is set for a field, that will only happen if the field is generic, as only the generic parameters are checked.
I now believe we cannot use type flags to handle opaque types. They seem like the wrong tool for this.
Instead, this PR replaces the previous logic by adding a new variant of `EvaluatedToOk`: `EvaluatedToOkModuloOpaqueTypes`, which says that there were some opaque types that got hidden types bound, but that binding may not have been legal (because we don't know if the opaque type was in its defining scope or not).
The current code is a basis for `is_const_fn_raw`, and `impl_constness`
is no longer a valid name, which is previously used for determining the
constness of impls, and not items in general.
And likewise for the `Const::val` method.
Because its type is called `ConstKind`. Also `val` is a confusing name
because `ConstKind` is an enum with seven variants, one of which is
called `Value`. Also, this gives consistency with `TyS` and `PredicateS`
which have `kind` fields.
The commit also renames a few `Const` variables from `val` to `c`, to
avoid confusion with the `ConstKind::Value` variant.
`match_impl` has two call sites. For one of them (within `rematch_impl`)
the fast reject test isn't necessary, because any rejection would
represent a compiler bug.
This commit moves the fast reject test to the other `match_impl` call
site, in `assemble_candidates_from_impls`. This lets us move the fast
reject test outside the `probe` call in that function. This avoids the
taking of useless snapshots when the fast reject test succeeds, which
gives a performance win when compiling the `bitmaps` and `nalgebra`
crates.
Co-authored-by: name <n.nethercote@gmail.com>
`simplify_type` improvements and cursed docs
the existing `TreatParams` enum pretty much mixes everything up. Not sure why this looked right to me in #94057
This also includes two changes which impact perf:
- `ty::Projection` with inference vars shouldn't be treated as a rigid type, even if fully normalized
- `ty::Placeholder` only unifies with itself, so actually return `Some` for them
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Add EarlyBinder
Chalk has no concept of `Param` (e0ade19d13/chalk-ir/src/lib.rs (L579)) or `ReEarlyBound` (e0ade19d13/chalk-ir/src/lib.rs (L1308)). Everything is just "bound" - the equivalent of rustc's late-bound. It's not completely clear yet whether to move everything to the same time of binder in rustc or add `Param` and `ReEarlyBound` in Chalk.
Either way, tracking when we have or haven't already substituted out these in rustc can be helpful.
As a first step, I'm just adding a `EarlyBinder` newtype that is required to call `subst`. I also add a couple "transparent" `bound_*` wrappers around a couple query that are often immediately substituted.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Begin fixing all the broken doctests in `compiler/`
Begins to fix#95994.
All of them pass now but 24 of them I've marked with `ignore HELP (<explanation>)` (asking for help) as I'm unsure how to get them to work / if we should leave them as they are.
There are also a few that I marked `ignore` that could maybe be made to work but seem less important.
Each `ignore` has a rough "reason" for ignoring after it parentheses, with
- `(pseudo-rust)` meaning "mostly rust-like but contains foreign syntax"
- `(illustrative)` a somewhat catchall for either a fragment of rust that doesn't stand on its own (like a lone type), or abbreviated rust with ellipses and undeclared types that would get too cluttered if made compile-worthy.
- `(not-rust)` stuff that isn't rust but benefits from the syntax highlighting, like MIR.
- `(internal)` uses `rustc_*` code which would be difficult to make work with the testing setup.
Those reason notes are a bit inconsistently applied and messy though. If that's important I can go through them again and try a more principled approach. When I run `rg '```ignore \(' .` on the repo, there look to be lots of different conventions other people have used for this sort of thing. I could try unifying them all if that would be helpful.
I'm not sure if there was a better existing way to do this but I wrote my own script to help me run all the doctests and wade through the output. If that would be useful to anyone else, I put it here: https://github.com/Elliot-Roberts/rust_doctest_fixing_tool
Fixes#96319
The logic around handling co-inductive cycles in the evaluation cache
is confusing and error prone. Fortunately, a perf run showed that it
doesn't actually appear to improve performance, so we can simplify
this code (and eliminate a source of ICEs) by just skipping caching
the evaluation results for co-inductive cycle participants.
This commit makes no changes to any of the other logic around
co-inductive cycle handling. Thus, while this commit could
potentially expose latent bugs that were being hidden by
caching, it should not introduce any new bugs.
Do not use `ParamEnv::and` when building a cache key from a param-env and trait eval candidate
Do not use `ParamEnv::and` to cache a param-env with a selection/evaluation candidate.
This is because if the param-env is `RevealAll` mode, and the candidate looks global (i.e. it has erased regions, which can show up when we normalize a projection type under a binder<sup>1</sup>), then when we use `ParamEnv::and` to pair the candidate and the param-env for use as a cache key, we will throw away the param-env's caller bounds, and we'll end up caching a candidate that we inferred from the param-env with a empty param-env, which may cause cache-hit later when we have an empty param-env, and possibly mess with normalization like we see in the referenced issue during codegen.
Not sure how to trigger this with a more structured test, but changing `check-pass` to `build-pass` triggers the case that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94903 detected.
<sup>1.</sup> That is, we will replace the late-bound region with a placeholder, which gets canonicalized and turned into an infererence variable, which gets erased during region freshening right before we cache the result. Sorry, it's quite a few steps.
Fixes#94903
r? `@Aaron1011` (or reassign as you see fit)
Spellchecking compiler comments
This PR cleans up the rest of the spelling mistakes in the compiler comments. This PR does not change any literal or code spelling issues.
Add the generic_associated_types_extended feature
Right now, this only ignore obligations that reference new placeholders in `poly_project_and_unify_type`. In the future, this might do other things, like allowing object-safe GATs.
**This feature is *incomplete* and quite likely unsound. This is mostly just for testing out potential future APIs using a "relaxed" set of rules until we figure out *proper* rules.**
Also drive by cleanup of adding a `ProjectAndUnifyResult` enum instead of using a `Result<Result<Option>>`.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Properly track `ImplObligations`
Instead of probing for all possible `impl`s that could have caused an
`ImplObligation`, keep track of its `DefId` and obligation spans for
accurate error reporting.
Follow to #89580. Addresses #89418.
