Support enum variants in offset_of!
This MR implements support for navigating through enum variants in `offset_of!`, placing the enum variant name in the second argument to `offset_of!`. The RFC placed it in the first argument, but I think it interacts better with nested field access in the second, as you can then write things like
```rust
offset_of!(Type, field.Variant.field)
```
Alternatively, a syntactic distinction could be made between variants and fields (e.g. `field::Variant.field`) but I'm not convinced this would be helpful.
[RFC 3308 # Enum Support](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3308-offset_of.html#enum-support-offset_ofsomeenumstructvariant-field_on_variant)
Tracking Issue #106655.
- Sort dependencies and features sections.
- Add `tidy` markers to the sorted sections so they stay sorted.
- Remove empty `[lib`] sections.
- Remove "See more keys..." comments.
Excluded files:
- rustc_codegen_{cranelift,gcc}, because they're external.
- rustc_lexer, because it has external use.
- stable_mir, because it has external use.
Implement `gen` blocks in the 2024 edition
Coroutines tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43122
`gen` block tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117078
This PR implements `gen` blocks that implement `Iterator`. Most of the logic with `async` blocks is shared, and thus I renamed various types that were referring to `async` specifically.
An example usage of `gen` blocks is
```rust
fn foo() -> impl Iterator<Item = i32> {
gen {
yield 42;
for i in 5..18 {
if i.is_even() { continue }
yield i * 2;
}
}
}
```
The limitations (to be resolved) of the implementation are listed in the tracking issue
Create a new ConstantKind variant (ZeroSized) for StableMIR
ZeroSized constants can be represented as `mir::Const::Val` even if their layout is not yet known. In those cases, CrateItem::body() was crashing when trying to convert a `ConstValue::ZeroSized` into its stable counterpart `ConstantKind::Allocated`.
Instead, we now map `ConstValue::ZeroSized` into a new variant: `ConstantKind::ZeroSized`.
**Note:** I didn't add any new test here since we already have covering tests in our project repository which I manually confirmed that will fix the issue.
ZeroSized constants can be represented as `mir::Const::Val` even if
their layout is not yet known. In those cases, CrateItem::body() was
crashing when trying to convert a `ConstValue::ZeroSized` into its
stable counterpart `ConstantKind::Allocated`.
Instead, we now map `ConstValue::ZeroSized` into a new variant:
`ConstantKind::ZeroSized`.
Add way to differentiate argument locals from other locals in Stable MIR
This PR resolvesrust-lang/project-stable-mir#47 which request a way to differentiate argument locals in a SMIR `Body` from other locals.
Specifically, this PR exposes the `arg_count` field from the MIR `Body`. However, I'm opening this as a draft PR because I think there are a few outstanding questions on how this information should be exposed and described. Namely:
- Is exposing `arg_count` the best way to surface this information to SMIR users? Would it be better to leave `arg_count` as a private field and add public methods (e.g. `fn arguments(&self) -> Iter<'_, LocalDecls>`) that may use the underlying `arg_count` info from the MIR body, but expose this information to users in a more convenient form? Or is it best to stick close to the current MIR convention?
- If the answer to the above point is to stick with the current MIR convention (`arg_count`), is it reasonable to also commit to sticking to the current MIR convention that the first local is always the return local, while the next `arg_count` locals are always the (in-order) argument locals?
- Should `Body` in SMIR only represent function bodies (as implied by the comment I added)? That seems to be the current case in MIR, but should this restriction always be the case for SMIR?
r? `@celinval`
r? `@oli-obk`
Rename AsyncCoroutineKind to CoroutineSource
pulled out of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116447
Also refactors the printing infra of `CoroutineSource` to be ready for easily extending it with a `Gen` variant for `gen` blocks
This commit hides the arg_count field in Body and instead exposes more
stable and user-friendly methods to get the return and argument locals.
As a result, Body instances must now be constructed using the `new`
function.
This field allows SMIR consumers to identify which locals correspond to
argument locals. It simply exposes the arg_count field from the MIR
representation.
Remove fold code and add `Const::internal()` to StableMIR
We are not planning to support user generated constant in the foreseeable future, so we are cleaning up the fold logic and user created type for now. Users should use `Instance::resolve` in order to trigger monomorphization.
The Instance::resolve was however incomplete, since we weren't handling internalizing constants yet. Thus, I added that.
I decided to keep the `Const` fields private in case we decide to translate them lazily.
Uplift `ClauseKind` and `PredicateKind` into `rustc_type_ir`
Uplift `ClauseKind` and `PredicateKind` into `rustc_type_ir`.
Blocked on #116951
r? `@ghost`
We are not planning to support user generated constant in the
foreseeable future, so we are removing the Fold logic for now in
favor of the Instance::resolve logic.
The Instance::resolve was however incomplete, since we weren't handling
internalizing constants yet. Thus, I added that.
I decided to keep the Const fields private in case we decide to
translate them lazily.
Note: We do not expect to provide internalizing methods for all
StableMIR constructs. They exist only to help migrating efforts to allow
users to mix StableMIR and internal constructs.
Add stable Instance::body() and RustcInternal trait
The `Instance::body()` returns a monomorphized body.
For that, we had to implement visitor that monomorphize types and constants. We are also introducing the RustcInternal trait that will allow us to convert back from Stable to Internal.
Note that this trait is not yet visible for our users as it depends on Tables. We should probably add a new trait that can be exposed.
The tests here are very simple, and I'm planning on creating more exhaustive tests in the project-mir repo. But I was hoping to get some feedback here first.
r? ```@oli-obk```
The `Instance::body()` returns a monomorphized body.
For that, we had to implement visitor that monomorphize types and
constants. We are also introducing the RustcInternal trait that will
allow us to convert back from Stable to Internal.
Note that this trait is not yet visible for our users as it depends on
Tables. We should probably add a new trait that can be exposed.
Also add a few methods to instantiate instances and get an instance
definition.
We're still missing support to actually monomorphize the instance body.
rustdoc: show crate name beside smaller logo
*Blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/12800*
## Summary
In this PR, the crate name and version are always shown in the sidebar, even in subpages, and the lateral navigation is always shown in the sidebar, even in modules.
Clicking the crate name does the same thing clicking the logo always did: take you to the crate root (the crate's home page, at least within Rustdoc).
The Rust logo is also no longer shown by default for non-Rust docs.
### Screenshots
<details><summary>Before</summary>
| | Macro | Module |
|--|-------|--------|
| In crate |  |
| In module[^1] |  | 
[^1]: This PR also includes a bug fix for derive macros not showing up in the lateral navigation part of the sidebar
</details>
#### Whole sidebar screenshots
| | Macro | Module |
|--|-------|--------|
| In crate |  | 
| In module |  | 
#### Different logo configurations
| | Short crate name | Long crate name |
|---------|------------------|-----------------|
| Root | ![short-root] | ![long-root]
| Subpage | ![short-subpage] | ![long-subpage]
[short-root]: 9e2b4fa8-f581-4106-b562-1e0372c13f79
[short-subpage]: 8331cdb8-fa13-4671-a1e2-dcc1cdca7451
[long-root]: 7d377fec-0f1d-4343-9f82-0e35a8f58056
[long-subpage]: 3b3094a4-63c9-477c-8c15-b6075837df30
##### Without a logo
### Preview pages
https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-5/sidebar-layout-rocket/rocket/index.htmlhttps://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-5/sidebar-layout-rocket/rocket_sync_db_pools/index.htmlhttps://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-5/sidebar-layout-rust-compiler/index.htmlhttps://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-5/sidebar-layout-rust/std/index.htmlhttps://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-5/sidebar-layout-rocket/tokio/index.html
## Motivation
This improves visual information density (the construct with the logo and crate name is *shorter* than the logo on its own, because it's not square) and navigation clarity (we can now see what clicking the Rust logo does, specifically).
Compare this with the layout at [Phoenix's Hexdocs] (which is what this proposal is closely based on), the old proposal on [Internals Discourse] (which always says "Rust standard library" in the sidebar, but doesn't do the side-by-side layout).
[Phoenix's Hexdocs]: https://hexdocs.pm/phoenix/1.7.7/overview.html
[Internals Discourse]: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/poc-of-a-new-design-for-the-generated-rustdoc/11018
## Guide-level explanation
This PR cleans up some of the sidebar navigation.
It makes the logo in the desktop sidebar a bit smaller, and puts the crate name and version next to it (either beside it, or below it, depending on if there's space), making it clearer what clicking on it does: click the crate name to open the crate's home page. It also removes the Rust logo from non-official-Rust crates, again to make the navigation and supply chain clearer (since the crate name has been added, the logo is no longer necessary for navigation).
It adds a bit more clarifying information for lateral navigation. On items that don't add their own sidebar items, it just shows its siblings directly below the crate name and logo, but for other items, it shows "In crate alloc" instead of just "In alloc". It also shows the lateral navigation tools on module pages, making modules consistent with every other item.
## Drawbacks
While this actually takes up less screen real estate than the old layout on desktop, it takes up more HTML. It's also a bit more visually complex.
## Rationale and alternatives
I could do what the Internals POC did and keep the vertically stacked layout all the time, instead of doing a horizontal stack where possible. It would take up more screen real estate, though.
## Prior art
This design is lifted almost verbatim from Hexdocs. It seems to work for them. [`opentelemetry_process_propagator`], for example, has a long application name.
[`opentelemetry_process_propagator`]: https://hexdocs.pm/opentelemetry_process_propagator/OpentelemetryProcessPropagator.html
## Unresolved questions
Maybe we should encourage crate authors to include their own logo more often? It certainly helps give people a better sense of "place." This seems to be blocked on coming up with an API to do it without requiring them to host the file somewhere.
## Future possibilities
Beyond this, plenty of other changes could be made to improve the layout, like
* Fix things so that clicking an item in the sidebar doesn't cause it to scroll back to the top.
* The [Internals demo](https://utherii.github.io/new.html) does this right: clicking an item in the sidebar changes the content area, but the sidebar itself does not change. This is nice, because clicking is cheap and I can skim the opening few paragraphs while browsing.
* The layout of the docs sidebar causes trouble to implement this, because it's different on different pages, but at least fix this on the file browser.
* Come up with a less cluttered way to do disclosure. There's a lot of `[-]` on the page.
* We don't lack ideas to fix this one. We have *too many*.
* Do a better job of separating local navigation (vec::Vec links to vec::IntoIter) and the table of contents (vec::Vec links to vec::Vec::new).
* A possibility: add a Back arrow next to the "In [module]" header?
* Give readers more control of how much rustdoc shows them, and giving doc authors more control of how much it generates. Basically, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115660 is great, let's do it too.
But those are mostly orthogonal, not future possibilities unlocked by this change.
In smir use `FxIndexMap` to store indexed ids
Previously we used `vec` for storing indexed types, which is fine for small cases but will lead to huge performance issues when we use `smir` for real world cases.
Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/issues/35
r? ``@oli-obk``
