Consider comments and bare delimiters the same as an "empty line" for purposes of hiding rendered code output of long multispans. This results in more aggressive shortening of rendered output without losing too much context, specially in `*.stderr` tests that have "hidden" comments.
Arbitrary self types v2: main compiler changes
This is the main PR in a series of PRs related to Arbitrary Self Types v2, tracked in #44874. Specifically this is step 7 of the plan [described here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44874#issuecomment-2122179688), for [RFC 3519](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3519).
Overall this PR:
* Switches from the `Deref` trait to the new `Receiver` trait when the unstable `arbitrary_self_types` feature is enabled (the simple bit)
* Introduces new algorithms to spot "shadowing"; that is, the case where a newly-added method in an outer smart pointer might end up overriding a pre-existing method in the pointee (the complex bit). Most of this bit was explored in [this earlier perf-testing PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127812#issuecomment-2236911900).
* Lots of tests
This should not break compatibility for:
* Stable users, where it should have no effect
* Users of the existing `arbitrary_self_types` feature (because we implement `Receiver` for `T: Deref`) _unless_ those folks have added methods which may shadow methods in inner types, which we no longer want to allow
Subsequent PRs will add better diagnostics.
It's probably easiest to review this commit-by-commit.
r? `@wesleywiser`
Lexing precedes parsing, as you'd expect: `Lexer` creates a
`TokenStream` and `Parser` then parses that `TokenStream`.
But, in a horrendous violation of layering abstractions and common
sense, `Lexer` depends on `Parser`! The `Lexer::unclosed_delim_err`
method does some error recovery that relies on creating a `Parser` to do
some post-processing of the `TokenStream` that the `Lexer` just created.
This commit just removes `unclosed_delim_err`. This change removes
`Lexer`'s dependency on `Parser`, and also means that `lex_token_tree`'s
return value can have a more typical form.
The cost is slightly worse error messages in two obscure cases, as shown
in these tests:
- tests/ui/parser/brace-in-let-chain.rs: there is slightly less
explanation in this case involving an extra `{`.
- tests/ui/parser/diff-markers/unclosed-delims{,-in-macro}.rs: the diff
marker detection is no longer supported (because that detection is
implemented in the parser).
In my opinion this cost is outweighed by the magnitude of the code
cleanup.
rustdoc: fix self cmp
Looks like condition in `filter` currently always `true`, but intended to compare with `fqp` from `if let Some(&(ref fqp, item_type))`?
Revert "bootstrap: print{ln}! -> eprint{ln}! (take 2) #134040"
Unfortunately, #134040 is proving to have caused more output interleaving problems that are tricky to diagnose and fix, and I think we probably should leave these untouched as bootstrap and compiletest has a bunch of interconnecting parts, and the commands and tools that they exercise do not consistently use stderr/stdout either. This causes hard-to-diagnose output interleaving bugs, which unfortunately degrades contributor experience.
This PR reverts two PRs in order to cleanly revert #134040:
1. Revert #134123 which is a fix-forward after #134040.
2. Revert #134040 itself.
I don't regret the initial effort `@clubby789,` and thank you for making the attempts, but I think we need to refrain from touching too many of these at once because some of the interleaving are very non-obvious and we don't have test coverage for.
r? `@clubby789`
cc `@Zalathar`
Fix our `llvm::Bool` typedef to be signed, to match `LLVMBool`
In the LLVM-C API, boolean values are passed as `typedef int LLVMBool`, but our Rust-side typedef was using `c_uint` instead.
Signed and unsigned integers have the same ABI on most platforms, but that isn't universally true, so we should prefer to be consistent with LLVM.
1268e87/llvm/include/llvm-c/Types.h (L28)
ABI checks: add support for loongarch
LoongArch psABI[^1] specifies that LSX vector types are passed via general-purpose registers, while LASX vector types are passed indirectly through the stack.
This patch addresses the following warnings:
```
warning: this function call uses a SIMD vector type that is not currently supported with the chosen ABI
--> .../library/core/src/../../stdarch/crates/core_arch/src/loongarch64/lsx/generated.rs:3695:5
|
3695 | __lsx_vreplgr2vr_b(a)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ function called here
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #116558 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116558>
= note: `#[warn(abi_unsupported_vector_types)]` on by default
```
[^1]: https://github.com/loongson/la-abi-specs/blob/release/lapcs.adoc
r? `@workingjubilee`
Add unpolished, experimental support for AFIDT (async fn in dyn trait)
This allows us to begin messing around `async fn` in `dyn Trait`. Calling an async fn from a trait object always returns a `dyn* Future<Output = ...>`.
To make it work, Implementations are currently required to return something that can be coerced to a `dyn* Future` (see the example in `tests/ui/async-await/dyn/works.rs`). If it's not the right size, then it'll raise an error at the coercion site (see the example in `tests/ui/async-await/dyn/wrong-size.rs`). Currently the only practical way of doing this is wrapping the body in `Box::pin(async move { .. })`.
This PR does not implement a helper type like a "`Boxing`"[^boxing] adapter, and I'll probably follow-up with another PR to improve the error message for the `PointerLike` trait (something that explains in just normal prose what is happening here, rather than a trait error).
[^boxing]: https://rust-lang.github.io/async-fundamentals-initiative/explainer/user_guide_future.html#the-boxing-adapter
This PR also does not implement new trait solver support for AFIDT; I'll need to think how best to integrate it into candidate assembly, and that's a bit of a matter of taste, but I don't think it will be difficult to do.
This could also be generalized:
* To work on functions that are `-> impl Future` (soon).
* To work on functions that are `-> impl Iterator` and other "dyn rpitit safe" traits. We still need to nail down exactly what is needed for this to be okay (not soon).
Tracking:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133119
