The `sig_dfl` variant of the attribute is the most likely variant to be
stabilized first, and thus to become the "most allowed" variant of the
attribute. Because of this, it is the most appropriate variant to use in
syntax tests, because even if the most allowed variant is used, the
compiler shall still emit errors if it e.g. is used in the wrong places.
Remove `Word` from the `unix_sigpipe` attribute template so that plain
`#[unix_sigpipe]` is not included in suggestions of valid forms of the
attribute. Also re-arrange diagnostics code slightly to avoid duplicate
diagnostics.
unix_sigpipe: Simple fixes and improvements in tests
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832 I included 5 preparatory commits.
It will take a while before discussions there and in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62569 is settled, so here is a PR that splits out 4 of the commits that are easy to review, to get them out of the way.
r? ``@davidtwco`` who already approved these commits in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120832 (but I have tweaked them a bit and rebased them since then).
For the convenience of my reviewer, here are the full commit messages of the commits:
<details>
<summary>Click to expand</summary>
```
commit 948b1d68ab (HEAD -> unix_sigpipe-tests-fixes, origin/unix_sigpipe-tests-fixes)
Author: Martin Nordholts <martin.nordholts@codetale.se>
Date: Fri Feb 9 07:57:27 2024 +0100
tests: Add unix_sigpipe-different-duplicates.rs test variant
To make sure that
#[unix_sigpipe = "x"]
#[unix_sigpipe = "y"]
behaves like
#[unix_sigpipe = "x"]
#[unix_sigpipe = "x"]
commit d14f15862d
Author: Martin Nordholts <martin.nordholts@codetale.se>
Date: Fri Feb 9 08:47:47 2024 +0100
tests: Combine unix_sigpipe-not-used.rs and unix_sigpipe-only-feature.rs
The only difference between the files is the presence/absence of
#![feature(unix_sigpipe)]
attribute. Avoid duplication by using revisions instead.
commit a1cb3dba84
Author: Martin Nordholts <martin.nordholts@codetale.se>
Date: Fri Feb 9 06:44:56 2024 +0100
tests: Rename unix_sigpipe.rs to unix_sigpipe-bare.rs for clarity
The test is for the "bare" variant of the attribute that looks like this:
#[unix_sigpipe]
which is not allowed, because it must look like this:
#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_ign"]
commit e060274e55
Author: Martin Nordholts <martin.nordholts@codetale.se>
Date: Fri Feb 9 05:48:24 2024 +0100
tests: Fix typo unix_sigpipe-error.rs -> unix_sigpipe-sig_ign.rs
There is no error expected. It's simply the "regular" test for sig_ign.
So rename it.
```
</details>
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97889
In `auxiliary/sigpipe-utils.rs`, all we want to know is the current
`SIGPIPE` disposition. We should not change it. So use `libc::sigaction`
instead of `libc::signal`. That way we can also remove the code that
restores it.
The test is for the "bare" variant of the attribute that looks like this:
#[unix_sigpipe]
which is not allowed, because it must look like this:
#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_ign"]
