Implement "claim" (issue #14), which is a version of "check" that
doesn't really do the check at runtime. It's an unsafe feature.
The new flag --check-claims turns claims into checks automatically --
but it's off by default, so by default, the assertion in a claim
doesn't execute at runtime.
Resources are now defined like...
resource fd(int n) { close(n); }
Calling fd with an int will then produce a non-copyable value
that, when dropped, will call close on the given int.
Non-copyability is not enforced yet, and something is still flaky with
dropping of the internal value, so don't actually use them yet. I'm
merging this in so that I don't have to keep merging against new
patches.
This reduces some redundancy in the AST data structures and cruft in
the code that works with them. To get a def_id from a node_id, apply
ast::local_def, which adds the local crate_num to the given node_id.
Most code only deals with crate-local node_ids, and won't have to
create def_ids at all.
Revert "rustc: Export only what's needed from middle::ty"
This reverts commit 4255d58aa5.
Revert "rustc: Make name resolution errors less fatal"
This reverts commit b8ab9ea89c.
Revert "rustc: Make import resolution errors less fatal"
This reverts commit 92a8ae94b9.
Revert "rustc: Export only what's used from middle::resolve"
This reverts commit 4539a2cf7a.
Revert "rustc: Re-introduce session.span_err, session.err"
This reverts commit 7fe9a88e31.
Revert "rustc: Rename session.span_err -> span_fatal, err -> fatal"
This reverts commit c394a7f49a.
With the changing of receive semantics the parser has been putting the rhs
expression in the first argument of expr_recv and the lhs in the second, and
all subsequent passes have been referring to them backwords (but still doing
the right thing because they were assuming that lhs was the port and rhs was
the receiver).
This makes all code agree on what lhs and rhs mean for receive expressions.
Most of the fields in an AST item were present in all variants. Things
could be simplified considerably by putting them in the rec rather
than in the variant tags.
Right now the only thing that it adds to meta_item is an indication of whether
the attribute was declared inside or outside the item, but I expect it will
become more useful.
Issue #487
