Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #126841 ([`macro_metavar_expr_concat`] Add support for literals)
- #126881 (Make `NEVER_TYPE_FALLBACK_FLOWING_INTO_UNSAFE` a deny-by-default lint in edition 2024)
- #126921 (Give VaList its own home)
- #127367 (Run alloc sync tests)
- #127431 (Use field ident spans directly instead of the full field span in diagnostics on local fields)
- #127437 (Uplift trait ref is knowable into `rustc_next_trait_solver`)
- #127439 (Uplift elaboration into `rustc_type_ir`)
- #127451 (Improve `run-make/output-type-permutations` code and improve `filename_not_in_denylist` API)
- #127452 (Fix intrinsic const parameter counting with `effects`)
- #127459 (rustdoc-json: add type/trait alias tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Uplift elaboration into `rustc_type_ir`
Allows us to deduplicate and consolidate elaboration (including these stupid elaboration duplicate fns i added for pretty printing like 3 years ago) so I'm pretty hyped about this change :3
r? lcnr
Support tail calls in mir via `TerminatorKind::TailCall`
This is one of the interesting bits in tail call implementation — MIR support.
This adds a new `TerminatorKind` which represents a tail call:
```rust
TailCall {
func: Operand<'tcx>,
args: Vec<Operand<'tcx>>,
fn_span: Span,
},
```
*Structurally* this is very similar to a normal `Call` but is missing a few fields:
- `destination` — tail calls don't write to destination, instead they pass caller's destination to the callee (such that eventual `return` will write to the caller of the function that used tail call)
- `target` — similarly to `destination` tail calls pass the caller's return address to the callee, so there is nothing to do
- `unwind` — I _think_ this is applicable too, although it's a bit confusing
- `call_source` — `become` forbids operators and is not created as a lowering of something else; tail calls always come from HIR (at least for now)
It might be helpful to read the interpreter implementation to understand what `TailCall` means exactly, although I've tried documenting it too.
-----
There are a few `FIXME`-questions still left, ideally we'd be able to answer them during review ':)
-----
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@scottmcm` `@DrMeepster` `@JakobDegen`
Cache hir_owner_nodes in ParentHirIterator.
Lint level computation may traverse deep HIR trees using that iterator. This calls `hir_owner_nodes` many times for the same HIR owner, which is wasterful.
This PR caches the value to allow a more efficient iteration scheme.
r? ghost for perf
coverage: Rename `mir::coverage::BranchInfo` to `CoverageInfoHi`
This opens the door to collecting and storing coverage information that is unrelated to branch coverage or MC/DC, during MIR building.
There is no change to the output of coverage instrumentation, but one deliberate change is that functions now *always* have an attached `CoverageInfoHi` (if coverage is enabled and they are eligible), even if they didn't collect any interesting branch information.
---
`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
DependencyList: removed outdated comment
Comment was outdated. Didn't updated description, as `Linkage` enum have descriptive names.
Also added fixme about moving this file to rustc_metadata.
Miri function identity hack: account for possible inlining
Having a non-lifetime generic is not the only reason a function can be duplicated. Another possibility is that the function may be eligible for cross-crate inlining. So also take into account the inlining attribute in this Miri hack for function pointer identity.
That said, `cross_crate_inlinable` will still sometimes return true even for `inline(never)` functions:
- when they are `DefKind::Ctor(..) | DefKind::Closure` -- I assume those cannot be `InlineAttr::Never` anyway?
- when `cross_crate_inline_threshold == InliningThreshold::Always`
so maybe this is still not quite the right criterion to use for function pointer identity.
cache type sizes in type-size limit visitor
This is basically https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125507#issuecomment-2206813779 as lcnr can't open the PR now.
Locally it reduces the `itertools` regression by quite a bit, to "only +50%" compared to nightly (that includes overhead from the local lack of artifact post-processing, and is just a data point to compare to the 10-20x timings without the cache).
```console
Benchmark 1: cargo +stage1 build --release
Time (mean ± σ): 2.721 s ± 0.009 s [User: 2.446 s, System: 0.325 s]
Range (min … max): 2.710 s … 2.738 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: cargo +nightly build --release
Time (mean ± σ): 1.784 s ± 0.005 s [User: 1.540 s, System: 0.279 s]
Range (min … max): 1.778 s … 1.792 s 10 runs
Summary
cargo +nightly build --release ran
1.52 ± 0.01 times faster than cargo +stage1 build --release
```
On master, it's from 34s to the 2.7s above.
r? compiler-errors
Add `as_lang_item` to `LanguageItems`, new trait solver
Add `as_lang_item` which turns `DefId` into a `TraitSolverLangItem` in the new trait solver, so we can turn the large chain of if statements in `assemble_builtin_impl_candidates` into a match instead.
r? lcnr
Re-implement a type-size based limit
r? lcnr
This PR reintroduces the type length limit added in #37789, which was accidentally made practically useless by the caching changes to `Ty::walk` in #72412, which caused the `walk` function to no longer walk over identical elements.
Hitting this length limit is not fatal unless we are in codegen -- so it shouldn't affect passes like the mir inliner which creates potentially very large types (which we observed, for example, when the new trait solver compiles `itertools` in `--release` mode).
This also increases the type length limit from `1048576 == 2 ** 20` to `2 ** 24`, which covers all of the code that can be reached with craterbot-check. Individual crates can increase the length limit further if desired.
Perf regression is mild and I think we should accept it -- reinstating this limit is important for the new trait solver and to make sure we don't accidentally hit more type-size related regressions in the future.
Fixes#125460
Rewrite handling of universe-leaking placeholder regions into outlives constraints
This commit prepares for Polonius by moving handling of leak check/universe errors out of the inference step by rewriting any universe error into an outlives-static constraint.
This variant is a work in progress but seems to pass most tests.
Note that a few debug assertions no longer hold; a few extra eyes on those changes are appreciated!
This version is a squash-rebased version of a series
of exiermental commits, since large parts of them
were broken out into PR #125069.
It explicitly handles universe violations in higher-kinded
outlives constraints by adding extra outlives static constraints.
Implement new effects desugaring
cc `@rust-lang/project-const-traits.` Will write down notes once I have finished.
* [x] See if we want `T: Tr` to desugar into `T: Tr, T::Effects: Compat<true>`
* [x] Fix ICEs on `type Assoc: ~const Tr` and `type Assoc<T: ~const Tr>`
* [ ] add types and traits to minicore test
* [ ] update rustc-dev-guide
Fixes#119717Fixes#123664Fixes#124857Fixes#126148
Rename `super_predicates_of` and similar queries to `explicit_*` to note that they're not elaborated
Rename:
* `super_predicates_of` -> `explicit_super_predicates_of`
* `implied_predicates_of` -> `explicit_implied_predicates_of`
* `supertraits_containing_assoc_item` -> `explicit_supertraits_containing_assoc_item`
This makes it clearer that, unlike (for example) [`TyCtxt::super_traits_of`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/ty/context/struct.TyCtxt.html#method.super_traits_of), we don't automatically elaborate this set of predicates.
r? ``@lcnr`` or ``@oli-obk`` or someone from t-types idc
patchable-function-entry: Add unstable compiler flag and attribute
Tracking issue: #123115
Add the -Z patchable-function-entry compiler flag and the #[patchable_function_entry(prefix_nops = m, entry_nops = n)] attribute.
Rebased and adjusted the canditate implementation to match changes in the RFC.
